Just a reminder that no one steals food in America. If you thought you saw someone shoplifting food, no you didn't! That never happened, you imagined it, turn around and walk away, nothing to report here.
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
530 points (99.3% liked)
politics
26226 readers
6593 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
it's AI
Everyone on a jury should argue this. "I can't trust the bodycam footage. Could be Sora. I have reasonable doubt."
load more comments
(1 replies)
But it's OK: Kristi Noem gets two $170,000,000 private jets, Trump gets a golden ballroom, a luxury airliner and billions of dollars in bribes, Argentina gets $40,000,000,000, and ICE get all the weaponry they desire plus big fat bonuses for hitting their kidnapping targets. So as you sit hungry through the holiday season, know that your tax dollars are at least giving someone a good time.
Let's instead phrase it that ICE gets more budget for militarization than the entire Israeli military.
Just let that sink in for a bit. ICE and resources allocated than the Israeli military.
It's the 16th most funded militarized force in the world.
Essentially equal to Canada's military budget.
Shits fucked
Republicans don't give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don't give a fuck if people starve.
At some point the Democrats have got to realize this and start acting accordingly, but Democrats are still bending the knee: 13 Senate Democrats just voted to install a conservative judge in Alabama.
Republicans don’t give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don’t give a fuck if people starve.
Maybe that's why they love Israel so much?
Did somebody say Bell riots? I thought I heard Bell riots.
Star Trek future here we come, huzzah!
Don't forget we have to do the Eugenics Wars first as well...
As well as World War III killing a double digit percentage of the world population.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I’m sure Mark Twain will rescue me from those
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
Thing is, it's gonna hit the rural MAGA folks the hardest.
There's a part of me that wants to go "I told you so.." which is expected..
But the more cunning part of me wants to leverage their hunger, dismay and rage and work to aim it squarely against Trump and the entire MAGA movement.
MAGA will blame the Ds and "libtards", because that's what they've been told to do.
Most of them will, but we don’t need most of them to tip the scales.
Who isn’t? It’s the “Schumer shutdown” and what did they say on Fox News? Something like “open the government and then discuss”. They eat that shit up.
Who do you imagine is going to blame the republicans? Trump is untouchable because they’ll just invent some story to justify their blind faith.
Hell, I had a family member tell me “you got to read between the lines. Don’t take anything he says literally”
Yup. Chomsky talked about the Angry White Man syndrome and how they were right to be angry, but they were angry at the wrong people.
Faux and other wingnut welfare outfits didn't run in the red for years on end (maybe some indefinitely) for no reason. All that infrastructure - Faux, Washington Times, hate radio, Regnery publishing, etc....is all there to properly indoctrinate a certain percentage of the population into believing all their problems are a result of anything else BUT Republican and conservative ideology.
use that to build class solidarity.
mocking them will achieve nothing except make you feel better
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'd like to have empathy, and publicly I won't call out these hypocrites, but I honestly can't care less if these fuckers starve. I feel bad for the children and helpless that are affected, but the others that voted for this are reaping what they sow.
Yeah, but "he's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting".
I try to have compassion for people that have made bad choices in their lives, but fucking hell, it is really hard to sustain that for people that voted to hurt other people. Actively wanting that to happen. Not to really improve their own lot in life, but to hurt others.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(11 replies)
Fact: absolutely none of this would have happened if Kamala had won.
But she was going to kill Palestinians with her bare hands!
Shame she decided to support wildly unpopular policy and messaging instead of winning.
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
This administration needs to be concerned about what happens when you have millions of people with nothing to lose anymore.
They want that
yhea they want escalation.
but that doesn't mean the best strategy is to do nothing.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Can any Americans explain to me, a Canadian, how it makes sense for essential services like food benefits to be suspended just because your government can't get their shit together?
Like, genuine question here; how is this is a good system? How does your country benefit from things being designed this way? I'm not saying we don't ever have political deadlock in Canada, we most certainly do, but even as someone who gets half my household income from the military, I've never had to worry about a missed paycheck just because politicians are being stupid. We have failsafes for that. Why don't you?
So, many many years ago, there was a system where when a bill was passed, that meant it got funded. Simple and sweet. Actually it wasn't that sweet, because Nixon was refusing to spend money that the law required the U.S. government to spend, similar to what Trump is doing today.
The current system is generally based on the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. There have been many small and large changes since, but the structure basically goes back to that.
load more comments
(1 replies)
In a sensible country, the government would continue to spend at the levels of the previous budget in the event of a delay in negotiating the renewed budget. It makes no sense. There are no benefits. Please do what you did in 1814 again we need it.
We don’t even need to go burn the white house down again, he tore it down himself.
load more comments
(2 replies)
So fun fact, the shutdowns came from a legal opinion of the AG in the 80s, and they didn't even adhere to that decision until a decade later, except for the first time. Reagan wanted the government shutdown to force Congress hands to cut more then they wanted to.
Then for the rest of the 80s and some 90s everybody ignored that AG decision until 1995 when Newt Gingrich (man that fuck was bad for the country) got into a fight with Clinton over spending and then all of the sudden the AG opinion mattered again.
load more comments
(15 replies)
Good we should stop paying our taxes.
if there isn't a government, why pay taxes to it?
actually, stupid question. but what percentage of people could do a tax strike, resulting in the government having no funds or means to go after all of them. and collapsing?
load more comments
(7 replies)
I wonder how many people on SNAP voted for the pedo-in-chief.
Like half of my friends are overt leftists who rely partially or fully on SNAP benefits, and they all voted against Trump. And I'm really worried about them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
And with only one week for people to prepare. Smooth.
Good, it is completely unnecessary. It's a bad solution to an old problem that already has much better solutions out there that are much more accessible too. They only made it so people will rely on them for everything and stop trusting others, but thankfully it failed. Canonical should be ashamed of themselves for ever trying this snap thing.
load more comments
(4 replies)
It's mostly going to be the elderly who suffer. People just forget about old people. They can't get out and go stand in line at food pantries.
Sometimes they don't have anyone checking on them very often.
Most don't know how to get online and find services and such.
If you have an elderly neighbor or family member. Try to check with them and see if they need help.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Both sides.
BOOoOoTh SiIiiiiIIiiiiiiDESssssssssSsS!!
Biden is old, you see, and there was also a woman who wasn't exactly adamant about Israel, so you have to starve now. But don't worry, if you starve enough, something will surely happen. And if not, at least there will be a civil war, isn't that great? You get to die in a random shootout, isn't that wonderful? So glad we didn't vote so this lady didn't win.
load more comments
(5 replies)
What the fuck. I know Republicans despise poor people and think they can just magically pick themselves up by their own bootstraps, but... People still need to eat! We obviously have to! Hoping no one I know is hurt in the upcoming riots and crime.
In the meantime, please consider donating to food banks and nonprofit organizations, since apparently none of our tax dollars will go to helping those less fortunate...
I'm a Free Thinker Who Does Her Own Research Republican using SNAP and if the DEMONRATS let this happen I'll be FURIOUS and VIOLENT towards THEM and THEM only (because Fox News TOLD me to!)!
load more comments
(1 replies)
A revolution welcomed by an administration to enact the final coup d’etat.
load more comments
(5 replies)
So about those government contracts for immigration, you would think some of those states that raked in a lot of money, could perhaps use that ill-gotten money to at least benefit the residents of their states.
Funny that Florida got more than half a billion dollars from the government the day before the shutdown, but they just can't find it within their hearts or their budget to use any of that money to feed families relying on food stamps in their state. Wonder where it's going instead?
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›