Unless publishing gatekeepers adopt drastically more equitable practices and become partners in disseminating knowledge, they will continue to lose ground to open access alternatives, legal or otherwise.

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If $1 of public money was involved in a study, its results should be public domain.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Okay but then how will the corporate goblins exploit us by land lording it?

[–] anzo@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Let's have the scientists' and governments' patents sold to them for pennies!! /s

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

No, no, the scientists owe the companies. For, uh.

The scientists owe the companies!

[–] Sparkles@fedia.io 16 points 4 days ago

Psyhub got me through my fieldwork.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

Piracy! For SCIENCE!

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Funny how that plays out, considering the data collection of LLMs have to dance around the copyright issue.

Not that I agree with many of people that say looking at a picture and adjusting weights is considered "stealing an image".