this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
164 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24793 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 60 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A few people I work with are huge Trump fans and with the news of taking over Greenland they are fully onboard with it and have been trying to find racial slurs for Greenland people. These people are mentally unstable and need to be removed from society.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What a fucked up world trump is making.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

His entire regime is truly evil and rotten to its core.

But hey, at least we don’t have a brown lady who laughs as our president.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 months ago

What is that minimizing title? He's talking about an invasion of conquest. Call it that.

[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Any American forces attacking Greenland are committing war crimes. If they listen to trump and go ahead with an attack the American military leaders of any rank will be guilty of war crimes. Let's see how many generals and admirals are willing to quit sucking trump's asshole and abide by the law.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

checks history notes

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (6 children)

guilty of war crimes

And just who would try them for it?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

The Revolutionary Committee

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So he’s choosing WW3. If the US attacks Greenland, that is attacking Denmark which is attacking the EU, he’d start a war between allies in NATO. Denmark would cite article 5, it would be war between NATO countries and the US.

[–] oz1sej@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hold your horses - NATO general secretary Mark Rütte has already said that he "wouldn't want to drag NATO into all this"... 🙄

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

The position of NATO general secretary is irrelevant, the actual treaty is irrelevant, in the end military action is always a political choice of member states.

The worrisome part of course is that Mark Rütte was leader of an EU country for 14 years. There are certain to be people loyal to the USA in EU politics and military after all those year of US alignment. Heck Russia has managed to buy a few EU politicians in a couple of decades.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Trump is rushing straight to Justice League without doing the world-building first. Not one single person in this country outside of Trump's inner circle hates the Danes or Greenlanders (guess maybe they are still Danes?).

You can't just will a country to war. At least some people have to believe in the mission. And I'm betting Trump's rural base could give an absolute fuck about Greenland. It's not even like it's a "DEI country," the way Africa and the Middle East are.

What in the fuck is he playing at?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

he wants the country to be 'at war' so all those wartime laws that give him more power come into affect. he can lockdown the entire country and claim that when a democrat sneezes its a national security issue, and oh look at that, this ancient law says he can lock citizens up.

that and he is a literal russian asset destabilizing the united states on behalf of putin.

thats my guess.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thats not a guess, thats a valid prediction based on the facts that we already know.

I agree with your prediction 100%, and add to it: When HitlerPig starts his war, whether in Greenland, Canada, Mexico, Panama, etc., he will call for a draft. In the past, there were deferments for those in college, or with good political connections, and those will still be in effect, but with restrictions. If you have student loans, you will be eligible for the draft. Only college students who have the money to pay cash for their college education will be deferred. That way the rich kids get out of it, but the poor and middle class still go. Only Republican connections will count for deferments, and even then only those who make substantial campaign contributions.

Anyone caught protesting will be drafted. Dissidents and critics will be drafted. Criminals will be drafted. Prisoners will be drafted. Age will not be a consideration, and you can be drafted even if you are retired. Basically, anyone they don't like will be drafted.

Of course, declaring a draft for a highly unpopular war will cause even more protests, where even more people can be detained and drafted.

I will declare this right now: There is absolutely no way I will allow my son to be drafted to fight in a MAGA war, for any reason.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What you describe is the least effective army that can be assembled. Not saying they wouldn't try, mind you... But that's not a group you give guns and put into a battlefield.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Obviously, MAGA isn't concerned with competence, just look at the people that they replaced competent leaders with.

They wouldn't care anyway. They are the types to just throw as many people at a front line as they can get. Kapo Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller has said that he wants to reduce our population from 335 million, to 100 million rich white people. A war that kills millions of middle class/poor people plays right into that plan.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seems like he could do that way more easily on our Southern border.

Send a helicopter to shoot at cartels near the border, wait until they finally shoot back. Send a mission deep into Mexico to attack the cartels and wait for the inevitable blow back.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree with a lot of that, but Trump is such an idiot, I can't imagine Putin would trust him enough to coordinate that closely. Maybe if it's just sheer manipulation. This is the weirdest fucking timeline.

I can't fucking believe it. Trump is taking over DC police, preparing for the inevitable civil backlash. Are all of those assholes really going to fight for him?

I legitimately have to worry that on my anniversary trip TSA is going to go through my phone and perhaps decide I'm a traitor for anti-Trump sentiment. I guess if I disappear in April and no one hears from me again you'll know what happened.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Travel with a new burner phone without your social media apps or emails on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Greenland(and the Faroe Islands) are autonomous territories of Denmark. They function very similarly to US States. They have their own local governing bodies that deal with local matters but when it comes to foreign affairs, monetary policy and security they defer to the Danish Government in which they also have their own dedicated representatives.

The people are full Danish citizens so they use a Danish passport but pretty much all of them will identify as Greenlander (or Faroese) first and as a Dane second.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

HitlerPig wants to quit NATO, amd form an alliance with Russia, China, and others. Both Russia and China have shown an interest in occupying Greenland. That allows them to have a base of power looming over Europe, and much closer to America.

In 2019, Tom Cotton got a letter from a Danish foreign minister, claiming to represent a Greenland separatist movement, and asking for money to fund a referendum on Greenland independence. Cotton took the letter to HitlerPig, who skipped right over the fundraising part, and decided that we could buy Greenland, and he hasnt shut up about it since.

In 2022, Danish intelligence determined the letter was a Russian forgery. The Russians sent the letter to Cotton because they knew he was stupid enough to not question its veracity, and woukd take it straight to HitlerPig. The Russians totally played both of those idiots.

Still, knowing the letter was a forgery, they have decided that its still a good idea to take Greenland. Theyve already invented a lot of propaganda claiming that Greenlanders actually welcome America's slavery, and these MAGA Morons always believe their own propaganda, so they are still in the hunt to buy, steal, or conquer Greenland.

Russia and China would love to share Greenland with America, so they can threaten western Europe more effectively.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Can't wait for them to try to false flag a terrorist attack from Greenland.

[–] LMDNW@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Trump will encounter a home-grown resistance in the US if he wages war on NATO. It will start a civil war. MMW

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd love to believe that but I find no evidence to support it

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

The problem is that invoking the term "civil war" for the US calls on a historical image of two clear sides, or perhaps the very vague handwaving history of the recent movie of the same name. There might finally be some sort of civil unrest against the government in some ways, but it won't be a Blue vs. Grey organized movement. More a fall into chaos where some places will go on as usual, while others might be a war zone type scenario caused by official lashing out at public actions. It's unprecedented, like most of recent events, and unusual because of the size and makeup of the US itself. It won't be like any other civil war.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Americans couldn't vote for Kamala because she wouldn't condemn Israel's genocide

Instead they ellected a war lord who will go to war with anyone for no reason

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 9 points 3 months ago

Why doesn't Greenland/Denmark disallow them from even having a base there anymore?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aka WW3 with America vs The World is not off the table.

If that happens, only American citizens will be able to stop it.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If that happens, only American citizens will be able to stop it.

So we are all fucked then... Americans couldn't be bother voting to prevent this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

I'm GLAD we Elect the Peaceful President!