this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
166 points (97.2% liked)

Pulse of Truth

856 readers
70 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon has disabled two key privacy features in its Alexa smart speakers, in a push to introduce artificial intelligence-powered "agentic capabilities" and turn a profit from the popular devices.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Did anyone else assume this from start ?

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean that’s what I thought was happening. I still don’t trust my Siri.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I trust Siri the most out of any of the voice.. things.

That said, I have never enabled it and do not trust it at all.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah but it still listens and it’s frustrating as shit.

[–] ghostlychonk@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I thought it was always listening and tailoring ads and stuff. I don't understand why people are so trusting of these voice assistants. I'm probably paranoid, but I even keep the mic turned off on my phone at all times.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about things you say near an Alexa smart speaker?

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 10 points 4 days ago

It's the same picture.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They doing it starting now? And not since the Alexa?

They are removing the "process recordings locally" option, which 0.03% of users had enabled. Not much of a change.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

For 99.97% of Alexa users nothing will change.

This is the point people are missing, because of headlines like this that have been implying or saying outright that "everything Alwxa hears you say" will be sent to Amazon from now on. Completely false true. As explained in the article (please read it) what you tell Alexa to do *after saying "Alexa" *will be sent to the cloud for processing, as already happens 99.97% of the time. The only exceptions until now have been for 0.03% of users who set an option to process all voice commands locally (which limits the quality of the response, since the Echo dot has limited processing power). Starting today this option won't work anymore - so if you are one of those 0.03% of users, you'll be affected. If you're one of the 99.97% of users, nothing will change. Amazon will receive the same information it always has.

The amount of misinformation that's been circulating about this is really mind-boggling, and some people will probably douchevote me for trying to clear it up. Note: I am NOT defending any Amazon business policies, working conditions, strikebreaking, actions or words of Jeff Bezos, or anything else. But I'm absolutely sure some people will see it that way, cuz we're not supposed to object to "good" misinformation.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But if it's listening for "Alexa" and that listening happens in Amazon's cloud server, they could record everything that is happening at all times with very little extra work.

[–] recall519@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's always been the case, and it still a potential security issue. Remember when the NSA was tapping webcams without even turning the light on. Anything plugged in with a speaker or camera like your TV, your remote, your computer, etc. is potentially vulnerable.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yes I absolutely agree. Just pointing out that the comment I replied to is false, it gives me the impression that the author thinks that they aren't being spied on by Amazon when they certainly are.

[–] theterrasque@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

Trigger word analysis happens locally. It's when that's triggered that audio gets sent to cloud

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Of course, and for all we know they're already recording everything Alexa hears, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to fuss over this announcement.

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just regularly tell it to go fuck itself and tell it to tell Jeff Bezos to fuck himself.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what would happen if you recorded a few dozen phrases like that, and then had them play randomly for eternity into a few Alexa devices. Would Amazon ban you?

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I was kind of thinking along those same lines, but what if millions of people did it.... Would it matter? Could a protest like that work or make Amazon see the error of their ways? I doubt it, but it would be fun nonetheless.

[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Alexa, fuck you bezos, you and your AI can eat a full bag of dicks.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Alternatively, don’t have one cos he doesn’t give a shit since you already paid him

[–] lzs_jinxin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So should I stop telling my Alexa all the hypothetical ways I would kill Jeff Bezos then?

[–] f34r@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

What makes you think this wasn’t the case the whole time? Try speaking with it off-line. There is no off-line. Don’t be naive.

…Good thing though, is that nobody cares about your data except you. It’s being sent over purely because of the compute resources required.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

They are gonna hear a ton of cussing when I tell her to turn on my lamp and she starts an audio book about lamps instead.