this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
361 points (99.7% liked)

News

32540 readers
2997 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 93 points 23 hours ago

All privately owned and controlled social media are all already right wing propaganda machines

This takeover of tiktok is just another cog in the giant right wing propaganda machine that's already been running for decades

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Tik tok will die and become a cesspit of far right people. Honestly just a way to burn billions of dollars in a year.

[–] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean, I hope so, just like I hoped so for Twitter.

Evidently a lot of people can't give up whatever is the biggest social platform of its type

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

I wonder if the demographics will change things. TikTok (I don't use it but from what I assume) is full of liberal people of different ages, genders (LGBTQ+) whereas Twitter was for mostly middle aged white people.

[–] TheseusNow@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You would think people could come together and find something else and just let it be an overpriced thing oracle buys. Need a fediverse clone.

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

That's Loops iirc

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fediverse is great but if its not going to pay "content creators" a large number of people won't move to it. Those with the highest engagement generally expect to get paid now and for some of them its their livelihood.

[–] TheseusNow@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

There is things like Patreon, and others like that. Perhaps some kind of addition to the app that makes it easy for advertisers to find you, and you get the added option on blocking advertisers who you don't agree with or something? That could actually mean cutting out the middle man and making better profits, or if using a middleman there could be several advert companies you can patch into your vids.

Just thinking out loud. There should be a model to make it work and far better than it does now.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Turning it into another X would be the dumbest strategy. Their best strategy is to shadowban both liberal and fascist rhetoric, and amplify the "apolitical" noise that everyone already uses it for. Make them feel like it's a platform connecting them, but don't let any real conversation happen. They have the power, now all they need is bread and circuses, and they will pay for them using oppression they keep hidden.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

TikTok already doesn't that kind of low-key suppression of content. I remember there was a big hubbub a few years back when it came out that TikTok had been actively suppressing content from disabled creators (as well as other groups). They apologised, and I think they said they would no longer do it, but I frequently hear people who continue to say that whenever they make posts that involve their disabilities, it feels like TikTok is still actively suppressing those posts.

In some cases, it appears to me that there isn't much evidence to support their suspicion — aside from the fact that we know for a fact that TikTok used to do this, and we have little reason to trust what TikTok claim when they are incredibly opaque at the best of times. It unnerves me that I don't know what to believe. Pretty much all big social media are terrible for transparency though, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, that's basically what I was getting at. Tiktok can just be the same slop farm it already is, be as useful as the right need it to be, and remain just as successful. The decision to drive Twitter into the ground was made by an individual whose intelligence is an extreme outlier. We shouldn't assume they'll make the same blunder with Tiktok.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Wrong, TikTok will become a right wing propaganda algo aimed at people Fox and OAN wouldn't ever reach.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure how the members of Congress of both parties who voted for the (imo unconstitutional, despite what the court says) TikTok ban expected government control of which media companies are allowed to operate in the US to end in any other way. Did they have fantasies of an apolitical forced takeover? Forced takeovers aren't generally apolitical things.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 18 points 23 hours ago

They didn’t. This is the Peter Theil future. The filthy masses controlled by social media manipulation.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Neoliberals and Republicans/maga all just assumed that they'd be personally handed the keys and get to enforce their own biases.

It's the same way they both controlled what their respective billionaire owned media said in private, then publicly complained about the other side doing it in public.

If you want a politician to do the ethical thing. You need to start looking at progression Dems.

Neo liberals have always just been conservatives who want to be popular. They think alike, that's why for decades there's been such a disconnect between Dem politicians and Dem voters.

Neoliberals don't represent Dem voters.

[–] laalaa500@kbin.earth 17 points 20 hours ago

I never had a tiktok. Left other social medias a long time ago. If you have accounts, I'd delete them. Be wary of how other websites might change or censor certain things.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

TikTok to transition? Ironic.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 9 points 16 hours ago

Anonymous, if you're listening...

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean. Thats sorta hilarious.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

because just how technology is and its relevance. Its not like you fill it with propoganda and everyone just eats it up. It turns into a bot circle jerk like X and real people go elsewhere. I mean you might grab so clueless low hanging grandma type fruit which they likely already had just with faux news (and I noticed news nation trying to act like old fox news. oh totally balanced over here. its like they are presenting it as the other side to faux news while being the same but with a lighter tone)

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong......but Loops is the only tiktok clone in existence, right?

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 13 points 22 hours ago

Basically the every social media site has a TikTok clone built in.