this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
919 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

8265 readers
2940 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
919
Ariana Grande (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 242 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

We've reached the point of idiocracy where everything needs to be read aloud.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And then have Grok summarize and "flavour" it.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

…in an order that would surprise you

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago

No, we haven't. Quit comparing everything to idiocracy; it was overly optimistic compared to reality.

Our problem is not well-meaning stupid people. Our problem is malevolent smart people leading hateful stupid people.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 17 hours ago

They still wouldn't understand.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 8 points 16 hours ago

With gameplay footage of some mobile game in the bottom half

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 19 points 16 hours ago

~~read~~ empathize

That's truly what they're unable to do: consider others. They don't know how it feels to be not-them, and they don't care.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 118 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's a rational question. Unfortunately it won't get the desired result, because the target audience is not going to behave rationally:

  • The media that they consume is following the fascist playbook. They're telling the audience that if things are not better yet, then it's because there are others still left to blame, and the worse things get the harder those others are going to be blamed for it.
  • Even if someone moves past that propaganda, it's been ingrained into them that to accept being incorrect is to admit failure. They've been primed to dig in and double down, lest their peers see them as a failure, or even worse as others.
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 21 points 13 hours ago

So many "My business is failing because of tariffs. Those dirty foreigners!" and then follow up with "Sure, I'd vote for him again! I support what he does."

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 77 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

Yes. They are happier.

They aren’t interested in making life better for anyone. They want it shittier for everyone else rather than actually improve themselves so they don’t have exert any effort or make sacrifices. The suffering they do get from trump’s policies is unexpected or “worth it” to fuck over everyone else.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago

Exactly, it doesn't matter if Trump's administration makes life worse for MAGA supporters. He could make their lives a living hell for all they care, arguably they're already there. His supporters just want to see people they don't like get hurt. That's it, they want to witness cruelty. Any conservative who didn't jump off MAGA band wagon a long time ago has fully drank the cool-aid.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 59 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like Ariana's music, but I respect her as a person and she's very talented at what she does. Despite people constantly making fun of her.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

I'll admit, I used to be in the anti-Ariana crowd after the whole donut thing surfaced. (Despite being a dumb teen when it happened who, despite not doing things similar, could understand the social pressure of doing it.) But every interview snippet I've seen with her has shown that she's got a good head on her shoulders and most importantly isn't afraid to tell people they're being a jackass on live television.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

I'll believe her and all these other wealthy philanthropists when they talk about tax reform. Everything else stems from that...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 51 points 17 hours ago

They just want someone to suffer more than them

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 9 hours ago
[–] Veedems@piefed.social 38 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (10 children)

Respect to her for being brave enough, as a public figure, and risking an endless torrent of backlash.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

This is not how some Trump voters I know think at all; it's not how they think of Trump. Bring up any of these points and they'd think you're totally paranoid.

I witnessed a group of old guys watching the movie 'One Battle After Another' scratch their heads and have literally, honestly no idea what it was about.

It's because they're in the habit of watching Fox News or other 'old' media. Trump's just some Republican like they've always voted for with a bunch of hysterical finger pointers, and any Democrat is basically Jimmy Carter or Hillary Clinton.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

That's only a portion of Trump voters though. There are a lot of younger voters with less ingrained brain washing that came recently from new media.

I honestly don't know what you do about the people you are speaking of. I have some in my extended family and there is no convincing them of things after 3 decades of programming. Even foundational knowledge isn't the same.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You tell them that Donald Trump is a felon. He committed 34 felonies. He was found guilty by a jury. But the judge decided not to punish him. It's a crime that normally gets prison time and Donald Trump belongs in prison, but the judge was scared. They'll try to deflect and make excuses and every time they do, you just repeat "Donald Trump is a felon"

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well not to mention the rape, and pedophilia.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah at some point folks get too old to change. You can try to get them off Fox News at least, but it just depends. Sometimes you can't. Sometimes they really can't even learn a new kind of remote/cable or whatever.

Younger folks are deep down the influencer rabbit hole, and I don't know what to do about that (other than pushing Fediverse) since Big Tech has such an iron grip on everything. I mean, the future is definitely cyberpunk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 27 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

She licked that donut that one time and I haven't been able to let that go.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

You lick one donut, you get ridiculed for life.

You rape a bunch of women and children while committing financial crimes, you become President of the United States

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 13 points 17 hours ago

I think it was some donut place in California.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 11 points 16 hours ago

What's funny is that if you just search "licks donut" all of the results are of Ariana Grande, poor woman 😂

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 19 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I want a six pack of Ariana Grande licked donuts and after each one I’d be like thank u, next.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I keep asking the conservatives in my life this. Thanos snap, all migrants are gone, how has your life improved? The only straight answer I've gotten was a creative use of math to show how much the US would save on benefits. Their proof relied on an omission from their source about who is going to lose benefits. The cost of enforcement, detention and removal was outside the bounds of the original question.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

The only straight answer I've gotten was a creative use of math to show how much the US would save on benefits.

And let me guess: that doesn't consider the increase in expenses going towards funding ICE...

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Thats not even including the tax revenue that's lost since many pay income tax (with no representation or access to benefits) essentially propping the system up, in part, for everyone else. I assume they think they can make up the difference on tariffs (nevermind much of that cost is passed on to ordinary Americans)

When the Ottomans took over Constantinople and the Eastern Roman Empire fell, they began charging steep taxes on goods travelling from East to West. The Portugese, not content with paying the tax, launched maritime expeditions to reach India and managed to find a direct route from Europe to India going around Africa's Cape of Good Hope. This was the start of the Age of Discovery. Spain commissioned Columbus with the same goal and.. well we all know where he ended up.

The point being when you charge an egregious tax or tariff people find a way around you rather than going through you. America is likely assuming its in such advantaged position globally that it can get away with it, but history shows that no nation / kingdom can survive alone and when you try to fleece people, they will find a way to exclude you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maxmm77@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ariana didn’t write this. That Instagram person Matt did, and Ariana reposted it.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Matt Bernstein, he's also got a podcast called A Bit Fruity, which (imo) has some very good takes.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 14 points 16 hours ago

Of course the answer is yes. They want the suffering. Everything else was just an excuse. They voted for the suffering of others, got the suffering of others, and are happy. Even if the price of groceries, gas, and everything else is higher, they don't mind because they got what they really wanted.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I'm going to pull this since it's not an archived link to Ariana Grande directly. Send me the link and I'll put it back up.

Edit: She shared a makeup artist's post, here is an article about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›