this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
245 points (98.0% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So ahead of the loyalty pledge ceremony to Trump, support aircraft are heading to the Middle East. Either a war with Iran or the end of Gaza is nigh.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 74 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Dane here: This does not make me feel warm and cozy.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 43 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

My sibling in the airforce is deploying in like 7 days. I have the same feelings that this will not be great

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Best of luck to your sibling and all of us, that this won't go totally sideways.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

that this won’t go totally sideways

So you haven't heard about the current US government....

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 11 points 20 hours ago

It's practically impossible not to.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They might just shoot up some luckless civilians, declare victory and go home. There's precedent for that.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, even the Iran thing was a bit bungled. Gaza makes sense, a more right sized target.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh, well that’s fine then.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 6 points 21 hours ago
[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Imagine enrolling in the military in the last checks notes 80 years

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

Don't complain. There's literally people who live in America now.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Im sure they want you to think its to fuel up all the fighter planes shooting down russian drones, not the big stategic bombers.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

sad hygge noises

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 44 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow the amount of terrifying options here are through the roof. Not sure why but I find Gaza or Iran the least terrifying outcomes...

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I mean the guy who almost caused a recession for not understanding what tariffs are wouldn’t just cause a war, would he? …would he?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well he might still cause a recession too, so…

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think we’re gonna get a capital “D” depression, and since orangeboi likes superlatives it’ll be “great”, and it’s gotta have a bigger number so there’s gonna be a 2 somewhere in there

[–] gac11@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Fast and Furious numbering style?

2 Great 2 Depression

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

You know what they say, a president during war time will always get reelected...

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 40 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

At first, I couldn't imagine that Trump cares enough to get us I into a war. But another thread got me thinking about this. If the US was embroiled in a war, the government would have context to start declaring anyone who doesn't support it to be actual traitors and execute them.

I hope that's not what this is, but that would be a typical Trump play. Jump into a whole-ass war that he gives not one fuck about, killing soldiers and foreign civilians, just because in times of conflict a President is given even greater authority and power because of the need for strong, decisive leadership.

Hopefully I'm just being cynical.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 32 points 18 hours ago

Trump was very interested in the fact that Ukraine wasn't holding elections because of the war, and because of that Zelensky was still president.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

It’s not just an excuse to impose martial Law in the us, but

  • that’s what bullies do: attack the weak because you think it makes you appear strong.
  • It’s a basic part of the MAGA playlist: find a distraction, stoke outrage, appeal to nationalism
  • TACO time. If he can’t impose martial law in Portland, find somewhere else so no one notices chickening out. Maybe Portugal or something: no one will notice the difference
  • time for another distraction from releasing the Trump-Epstein files
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 13 hours ago

It's yet another step in the fascist playbook

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They prepare to annihilate Gaza the very second they have the last hostage out.

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're being a little optimistic about the hostages, because Trump and Netanyahu know that Hamas won't accept the "Peace deal" that they have been left out of negotiating, and thus they'll say that Hamas is responsible for the deaths of the hostages when American forces join the IDF in flattening Gaza and then turning it over to Tony Blair.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Tony Blair?? Why is that asshat’s name back in the zeitgeist?

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

What a nice thought

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He wants that nobel peace prize and if he has to bomb his way to it!

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

He doesn't care how many people he has to get killed to get it.

[–] Trill88@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Hold on to your butts 🚬

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the generals and admirals need gas to get home

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

They should have plenty once they switch to their new Government-mandated diet plan.