this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10481 readers
419 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (24 children)

Good. Eliminating all door to door deliveries is not the answer and whoever came up with that rationale needs to removed immediately.

And again, for the people in the back: Canada post is a service. It doesn’t make money. It costs money. Same way public healthcare does.

Why are they trying to spin it as a business that needs to generate profit or undertake cost cutting measures to exist and continue providing services that are still being widely used?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don’t have to spin it as a business to say that evolving it to reflect reality makes sense. It is not exactly radical to say everybody should get the same level of service that the majority of us get today.

Fewer than 25% of Canadians have door to door delivery. Almost everybody gets delivery to a private mailbox very close to their house. Door to door delivery is down to under 4 million addresses. This is a 10 year plan to finish that transition. Not exactly aggressive.

You can still get delivery to your door if you are disabled.

Regardless of if it is a a business or an essential service, we should be honest about it. We used to send 5 times as much mail when we were fewer people. Why do we have to ignore that?

If 75% of us (like me) are totally fine with super mailboxes, I think the rest can handle it. I know that I could get away with delivery 3 times a week as well. In 2030, how time sensitive is something coming through regular mail. Let’s be real. I could wait one more day.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I agree with your notion of “evolving it” to fit the needs and requirements of today however I don’t agree with your other points.

Their plan is to remove door to door entirely, not just limit it to 3 days (which, I wouldn't have any major qualms about at this time if that was the endgame, which it isn’t)

However I shouldn’t need to be disabled to receive this basic level of service, nor do I want to hobble over to the mailbox or postal office that’s “very close to my house” because the current one is a 15 minute walk on a good day, and a 35 minute trudge through half snow covered roads on a bad one. And if we’re going with this, hypothetically, how would I even know I have any mail? Do I get a call? Do I get a notice at my door? Do I just have to show up every so often and check?

If it’s option 1, I can assure you that my phone’s functions are set by default to filter and drop any unknown calls. So that’s far from an optimal approach.

If it’s option 3, I will not be randomly dropping by the postal office or box because currently nowhere near (or on) any common route that I take, and I have no reason to do a random cold check especially if I work primarily from home

And if it’s option 2, you’re already here to deliver my notice, might as well bring my mail instead.

Besides the above outlined items, I’m not going to touch the time sensitive items argument because Canada post handles more than just mail, they also handle biological deliveries, medicine, restricted substances, stuff like live bees, all your legal documents, subpoenas, medical, etc. plus a bunch of other services that I’m probably forgetting.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Nice one community mailboxes are close to the house. And most people already use them. So why should a select few get special treatment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Because lots of rich people froth at the mount trying to get in on the privatization of a public service.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Want to know how to get Canada Post back on its feet, financially? Ban private delivery services.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Compete , optimize operation cost, and don't listen to trump asking to spend 5% on NATO

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Competition divides revenue, which leads to lower wages and benefits. The only people that benefit from competition, are the ones who own the company. And Canada Post is a government service. Its success should not be tied to profits.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canada Post need to compete on quality of services, not in profits. Being not about profits should gives post canada an advantage if the government is serious at preserving quality public services

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree they need to compete at all. They provide essential services that aren't replaceable by private services.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The government is trying to make the service worse for people by seeking profitability of the service over it's quality

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The only people that benefit from competition, are the ones who own the company.

Ask people in BC how much they benefit from ICBC having a monopoly on car insurance...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Make Canada post a military division? Heh

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They don't need to turn a profit but the costs need to be financially sustainable. I don't think banning competition is a good move, that's unnecessary. The question should be posed to Canadians at large: what is CP's services worth to us, as a nation? Lemmy's views will certainly be skewed but we need an honest holistic view. Based on @GodofLies@lemmy.ca calculation in this thread I'm cool with the $50 a year 'fee', but that will certainly grow with their losses and they do need capital investment to improve/modernize aspects of the service.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Canada post's costs are less than 1% of the government budget.

If we're looking to save money there's better places to look.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh I am aware that they don't really need to turn a profit. Net zero / cost recovery is more than good enough. And I am in no way implying using government legislation to regulate that market. We need Canada Post to change their business model where they can still retain their currently hired employees. Are they seriously not able to make significant changes to their existing model to be more competitive? It reeks of a non-innovative c-suite and board (and government officials) unwilling to take the hard road of actually working with the employees to make complex organizational changes. They are taking the easy way out via 'standard accounting/business practices' by slashing services and worker layoffs. That's the easy way out.

What does the hard way look like? How about sitting down with union employees down to the lowest worker level and actually find ways for cost savings and new business opportunities to patch the shortfall? I don't to believe that CP management truly has tried other than finger-pointing at external private businesses stealing their lunch from underneath them or government legislation that's unwilling to change (because the fed gov is really the one in control here - so again, I'm saying they're just taking the easy way out. You think an elected federal government employee is going to sit down and do the hard work to go around talking to a large number of union employees to find a way through all this? My bet is no - they'll take the easy way out.)

load more comments (2 replies)

...or at the very minimum crack down on the 'independent contractor' nonsense. Make Amazon pay for UI, vacation, healthcare, car insurance, for all its delivery drivers. Our politicians allow too many scams, and it hurts everyone.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"The bottom line is this: Canada Post is effectively insolvent," Lightbound said earlier Thursday.

"It provides an essential service to Canadians, and in particular to rural, remote and Indigenous communities, and Canadians are rightfully attached to it and want it saved. However, repeated bailouts from the federal government are not the solution."

FFS it's a service not a business; profit is not the goal. Paying bills for services isn't 'bailing out' your service provider, it's paying for what you've used.

Mail transit is essential for a modern civilization, and it's not something that should be privately controlled. Having private options is fine, but there should ALWAYS be a federal mail service.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

Seeing how we also do this with public transit, hospitals, libraries and other public services, this point of view is disappointing and unfortunately very prevalent. The only thing where we can dump billions without ever asking if it's profitable, is roads. We can expropriate and build a 4 lane highway extension in the middle of a corn field for a little half a billion, multiple times, but funding hospitals, schools, public transit, clean water, the mail... ugh, such money pits!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Stand with the posties and send a message to this government that siding with corporations instead of labour won't end well.

[–] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

I'm curious to see just how quickly Hajdu will reach for that trusty section 107.

Whenever it happens, we're all in for some pure cinema as the feds realize they've already spent the last magic bullet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the angle people aren't looking at more is the financial side of things and actually calculating it out. [https://www.canadapost-postescanada.ca/cpc/en/our-company/financial-and-sustainability-reports/2024-annual-report/our-financial-picture.page](Canada Post's Financials - See the first chart yourselves)

So it seems like 2018 they invested a little and the loss reduced. COVID happened so the big loss there isn't surprising. However, in between the reduced service, someone ate their lunch or their upper management / c-suite / board no longer has the qualifications to lead it's own team. Change the management already.

The monetary part of how much this subscription to Canada Post is going to be..: 841 million/41 million (current Canadian population) ~= $20.51 cents (rough math of ~$52.56 dollars per household based on 16 million addresses in Canada Post's system) Canadian to have delivery/mailbox/post offices/parcel pickups. Now go compare the rates that Canada Post offers versus FedDex, DHL etc. Ask yourself, would you still use Canada Post?

So yeah, let's all be outraged about $52.56 dollars for this service.

[–] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Federal government is spending 13 billion on a VW battery plant in St Thomas, Ontario

That's 13 billion dollars / 41.million Canadians = $317 per Canadian

This is projected to employ 3000 people. Canada Post employs 62,300 people.

Canada post employs 21 X as many people as the VW plant hopes too.

CP could lose 1 billion a year for 273 years before it would cost the Canadian tax payer as much per job as the VW plant workers do. And that is if the VW plant stays on target and doesn't end up like North Volt

I don't know what the path forward for Canada Post is but the government narrative is whack. If the government is trying to save money why are they spending so much for 3000 jobs and celebrating that as a huge win?

It seems like they don't value workers or Canadians just corporate profits at the Canadian tax payers expense.

We should expect more from our government.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The $13B was production based tax credits. No one explains how government funding works, or the milestones.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly, we should all be outraged at the other expenditures that the federal government is pushing. What good does a VW battery plant do for us as Canadians as a whole when it's for a private foreign company???

I will also say, you can't compare a battery plant to a postage service. The model to fund CP used to work until it didn't.

We should be asking what went wrong? Why is that so? Why aren't their executives being fired and the board changed? Did they even ask their own union employees for real feedback on what can be changed other than the tidbits we hear in the news? Because it seems like these days a lot of upper to mid management seem to be trying real hard to justify their own existences - elected government officials included (which we should always keep them to the fire and expect a high level of competence for handling our taxpayer money and good governance for us all equally).

[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Support to these workers striking - Mark Carney promised he wouldn't do austerity like Pollievre and hes blatantly breaking that promise with funding cuts for Canada Post. If there's a crisis at Canada Post its because they need to be funded, not have working hours cut in the name of austerity.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Looking at the loss numbers cited since 2018 come down to $20-30 per Canadian per year tops. This whole hullabaloo, erosion of confidence, economic disruption and more are over that. Mail and parcel delivery is basic economic infrastructure today. Having a public, reliable delivery service that covers all of Canada, that's run below cost, is an economic enabler for Canadian businesses, like water, electricity and roads. I can't believe we're doing what we're doing right now, especially for a government that talks about boosting Canada's economy. Ridiculous.

E: I'm beginning to believe that this isn't about incompetence mismanagement but perhaps willful mismanagement on the part of CP's exec layer who perhaps see higher compensation on the horizon, should CP be privatized. Of course at the expense of everyone else, workers, businesses and individual Canadians.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It’s crazy how governments across the world are failing their citizens but seem to have unlimited money for corruption

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What changed for 2018 to turn gains to losses?

load more comments
view more: next ›