this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10481 readers
476 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Want to know how to get Canada Post back on its feet, financially? Ban private delivery services.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Compete , optimize operation cost, and don't listen to trump asking to spend 5% on NATO

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Competition divides revenue, which leads to lower wages and benefits. The only people that benefit from competition, are the ones who own the company. And Canada Post is a government service. Its success should not be tied to profits.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Canada Post need to compete on quality of services, not in profits. Being not about profits should gives post canada an advantage if the government is serious at preserving quality public services

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I disagree they need to compete at all. They provide essential services that aren't replaceable by private services.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The government is trying to make the service worse for people by seeking profitability of the service over it's quality

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only people that benefit from competition, are the ones who own the company.

Ask people in BC how much they benefit from ICBC having a monopoly on car insurance...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean they're doing better then Albertans.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ask anyone in BC what their private health insurance looks like these days. Lots of companies out there, and none of them are offering plans anywhere close to what they used to. The difference is, ICBC has the largest cash reserve for payouts...while private insurance companies only have a fraction. That's why premiums go up and services go down. None of them alone, are able to make enough money to sustain the level of service we expect. Put them all together, and they should. But only if you also remove the profit margins from the equation.

You want to fix ICBC...then we need to regulate it better. The more it behaves like a private insurance company, the worse the service gets. Treat it like a non-profit public service, and watch it come back to where it should be.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean Alberta has only private insurance and the highest rates on the country. So private isn't the answer.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Perfect example.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Make Canada post a military division? Heh

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are you an idiot? Canada has no unlimited money . Canada will keep increasing the military defense while reducing the quality of all the services

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 hours ago

Apparently I am, because I can’t parse that comment.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We should meet the 2% at the very least.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...you can't compete with Amazon using 'independent contractors' that drive their own cars, work until 10pm, 7 days a week, with no benefits.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Will banning amazon improve post canada services?

Making Amazon pay its workers would greatly level the playing field so Canada Post can compete again.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to spend more money on defense sorry. The world is changing and we are severally underfunded for defence.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not by sacrificing other things

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

They don't need to turn a profit but the costs need to be financially sustainable. I don't think banning competition is a good move, that's unnecessary. The question should be posed to Canadians at large: what is CP's services worth to us, as a nation? Lemmy's views will certainly be skewed but we need an honest holistic view. Based on @GodofLies@lemmy.ca calculation in this thread I'm cool with the $50 a year 'fee', but that will certainly grow with their losses and they do need capital investment to improve/modernize aspects of the service.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Canada post's costs are less than 1% of the government budget.

If we're looking to save money there's better places to look.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I am aware that they don't really need to turn a profit. Net zero / cost recovery is more than good enough. And I am in no way implying using government legislation to regulate that market. We need Canada Post to change their business model where they can still retain their currently hired employees. Are they seriously not able to make significant changes to their existing model to be more competitive? It reeks of a non-innovative c-suite and board (and government officials) unwilling to take the hard road of actually working with the employees to make complex organizational changes. They are taking the easy way out via 'standard accounting/business practices' by slashing services and worker layoffs. That's the easy way out.

What does the hard way look like? How about sitting down with union employees down to the lowest worker level and actually find ways for cost savings and new business opportunities to patch the shortfall? I don't to believe that CP management truly has tried other than finger-pointing at external private businesses stealing their lunch from underneath them or government legislation that's unwilling to change (because the fed gov is really the one in control here - so again, I'm saying they're just taking the easy way out. You think an elected federal government employee is going to sit down and do the hard work to go around talking to a large number of union employees to find a way through all this? My bet is no - they'll take the easy way out.)

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do they need their current level of employees. Maybe they need to downsize of service is being cut.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, I think we can agree they have lots of employees. What do each of them do? Now, why can't we have other kinds of jobs for workers instead of straight up layoffs? I'm saying going straight to downsize is the easy solution because no one in upper management etc wants to develop new businesses that CP can do and service and still make money!! Are some jobs obsolete and outdated? Very likely. Is there a lot of redundancy? I'm sure every government run entity has it. Now who made the shots of hiring more and more? Management. Why aren't they the first to go? Why is the onus on lower level employees?

We can let people go, eliminate jobs all we want about a shrinking business model because they (management) didn't pivot or come up with new models to effectively retain cost-neutral/profitability. What isn't the government and CP saying instead of going straight to cuts? Show us what they tried to get out of this deficit. Well turns out from all the reporting, they did very little and the private sector took their lunch. What a disaster.

Postage services can be so much more, they just aren't willing to try. Why can't they do basic banking? Financialization. They had the opportunity to but chose not to because they're dinosaurs with outdated business models. Be a storage depot / warehouse for small businesses. I'm just throwing ideas out there.

...or at the very minimum crack down on the 'independent contractor' nonsense. Make Amazon pay for UI, vacation, healthcare, car insurance, for all its delivery drivers. Our politicians allow too many scams, and it hurts everyone.