I'll believe it when I see it.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Even then, still question.
We all know Trump will just not sign it... right?
I'm trying to imagine the absolutely disaster that would be for him. Trump refusing to sign puts ownership of the Epstein coverup directly on him alone in a way that it really hasn't been thus far. That might be a better outcome for Trump than the world finding out the extent of his involvement in sex trafficking with Epstein, but it is still a terrible scenario for him. Particularly if it happens before the election because it then gives Democrats something to directly rally his own base against Republicans while campaigning: Give us enough seats in Congress and we will override this veto and deliver the Epstein files.
You're over thinking it.
"This is a witch hunt bill passed by Nancy Pelosi, Obama, Hilary Clinton (what about her emails) and radical left lunatics to insult your favorite precedent."
Trump will sign anything that is put on that desk. And when I say anything, I mean anything
It's a petition for Congress not a bill, so if I understand correctly the Senate nor the Executive branch would have a say in blocking it.
Maybe someone will correct me if I'm wrong
Couldn't any Democrat with access to the unredacted documents just dump the whole pile into the record of a random committee meeting and poof it is now in the Library of Congress?
I assume no one in Congress has access or they would have just started reading them on the floor. The FBI likely only has them, which of course has had 7 years or so to make things disappear.
From my understanding, the democrats don't have access to all of the files. Any that they've had access to, were released.
It's not a matter of if the actual truth comes out, but when. At least that's what I reckon.
There are just way too many people caught up in the web -- and orders of magnitude more who have a non-zero investment in the outcome, emotionally or otherwise -- for it to quietly fade away like they're wanting it to.
This is like, the last reliably bipartisan thing we have left if you don't count eating, sleeping and shitting. I would say it's even beyond that - pretty much everyone who's not a pedo (which I would hope is, like, at the very minimum 99%) wants the same thing -- for the truth to come out, and for comprehensive justice to be served.
I'm not going to make it part of my personality and larp as an activist, filling the Internet with low-effort spam, or claiming that everything else that ever happens is "a distraction" from this, no.
The dam will break, the ticking thingy eventually explodes, and I can be very patient. I just hope we still have a functioning justice system when it does.
It’s never coming out in its entirety. Ever.
Another Democrat: pulls a Fetterman and votes no
All this means is another GOP in Democrat clothing will have to reveal themselves to keep the shit sealed. We have no idea how many shills are wearing a fake cap right now.
We all know he's in there. He literally bragged about molesting children before he was elected. What is this going to change?
He'll lose some of his followers and that's about it.
It's good for many reasons that the Republican candidate lost, but unless I am mistaken, the Republican candidate also said that he would sign the petition to release the Epstein files if he won.
You trusted him to actually do it?
I don't trust any politicians. There are even politicians who switch parties at some time after they're elected.
You're not supposed to trust a politician. You're supposed to bullwhip them if they don't follow their campaign promises.
Where's the whip?
In the minority party.
Both candidates in this election pledged to release the files though so it’s less that the democrats winning that made this possible and more that this vote can now be cast.