this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
323 points (93.3% liked)

politics

22566 readers
3963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 84 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't care who controls whom. You're both fucking trash.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Putin. Putin controls them both.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 8 points 4 days ago

So true. Not enough people realize how much power and experience weilding that power that Putin has over oligarchs. Putin is the man behind these "men."

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Putin controls a lot of things but he doesn't own ole Musky. That's a uniquely special brand of evil and crazy.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I distinctively remember Musk going from bragging about offering Starlink to Ukrainian troops for free to limiting Starlink's reach for Ukrainians and demanding for someone to pay for Ukraine's usage of the network just days after having a private phone conversation with Putin. He went far more publically crazy and anti- Ukraine on X after that too.

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 1 points 4 days ago

I mean, do they both want to play the evil game along a stray dog raised in the Kgb?

Whats fun with narcissist people is they've no clue about opponents skills, since they can't see over they're own ones.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I care insofar as I want the two of them to divorce sooner rather than later

[–] radiohead37@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The article’s title does not match the content. I read it and it does not talk about how Musk controls Trump. It talks about retaliation for those organizing protests against Tesla.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, you really have to read the literal and between the lines understand where the author is coming from.

“Those are the real villains here, and we’re going to go after them,” the DOGE chief warned. “The president has made it clear, we’re going to go after them.”

Author is tying his tweets, this desperate interviews to the administration's actions to get actual people charged with hate crimes for properly damage not to mention getting his shitty AG to prosecute property damage as domestic terrorism.

Right or wrong, I do see what the author was trying to get at.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Well he isn't wrong.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hey you White House, hahaaa, charade you are!

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He’s the opposite of Mary Whitehouse though.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago

Seems like a relevant context.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In a matter of months, Tesla’s brand identity has radically shifted from a liberal-leaning, environmentally conscious car label to a symbol of Donald Trump’s movement, thanks to Musk’s “dark MAGA” rebranding.

you mean nazi ?
...

YOU MEAN NAZI ?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That fucking thumbnail. I can't even post the thoughts that enter my mind when I see it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

"Mike Myers acted a better cringey villain."

Close?

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Because he hacked the election machines and used Twitter to push spam.

He owns Trump and atrump knows it; otherwise he'd be staring down the barrel of a few dozen felonies.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Is this like Mutually Assured Destruction but for felonies?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 4 days ago

Please throw him out of a window. Pleeeeeease

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Someone needs to convince dear leader that that the enemies are in his own house!

“What’s happening, it seems to me, is they’re being fed propaganda by the far left, and they believe it. It’s really unfortunate,” Musk continued, claiming that the “real problem” isn’t the “crazy guy” who attacks his vehicles but rather the people that push the “propaganda” that encourages him to do it.

Four top officers at the company have unloaded more than $100 million in stock since last month, reported ABC News. They include James Murdoch, the estranged son of right-wing media magnate Rupert Murdoch, and Elon Musk’s brother Kimbal Musk, who shed $27 million, according to a Security and Exchange Control filing.

Go after them Elon! They must be the problem - they're the only ones with the money!

“Those are the real villains here, and we’re going to go after them,” the DOGE chief warned. “The president has made it clear, we’re going to go after them.”

“The ones providing the money, the ones pushing the lies and propaganda? We’re going after them,” Musk said, casually pointing his fingers in the shape of a gun.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

IDK it feels mostly pathetic pleading to shareholders that he will be able to get the situation under control, and the line will go back up. It's pathetic is what it is.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago

I'm sure Trump says the same thing 

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

From the article ...

“What’s happening, it seems to me, is they’re being fed propaganda by the far left, and they believe it. It’s really unfortunate,” Musk continued, claiming that the “real problem” isn’t the “crazy guy” who attacks his vehicles but rather the people that push the “propaganda” that encourages him to do it.

“Those are the real villains here, and we’re going to go after them,” the DOGE chief warned. “The president has made it clear, we’re going to go after them.”

“The ones providing the money, the ones pushing the lies and propaganda? We’re going after them,” Musk said, casually pointing his fingers in the shape of a gun.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Also:

On Monday, Washington’s Metropolitan Police revealed that two people accused of vandalizing a Tesla windshield will be charged for “political hate speech.”

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

“political hate speech.”

I worry that we will see the rise of that phrase in future months as it's used against citizens who are pro-democracy.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Can’t wait for Trump to deport him.