this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)

News

32391 readers
3971 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States is considering imposing sanctions as soon as this week against the entire International Criminal Court, putting the court's day-to-day operations in jeopardy in retaliation for investigations of suspected Israeli war crimes.

Washington has already imposed targeted sanctions on several prosecutors and judges at the court, but naming the court itself in the sanctions list would be a major escalation.

Six sources with knowledge of the matter, all speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive diplomatic issue that has not been publicly announced, said a decision on such "entity sanctions" was expected soon.
A source said court officials had already held emergency internal meetings to discuss the impact of potential blanket sanctions. Two other sources said meetings had also been held of court member state diplomats.

One U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, confirmed that entity-wide sanctions were being weighed but did not elaborate on the timing of the possible move.

A State Department spokesperson accused the court of asserting what it said was its "purported jurisdiction" over U.S. and Israeli personnel and said that Washington was going to take further steps although the spokesperson did not say exactly what.

"It (the ICC) has the opportunity to change course by making critical and appropriate structural changes. The U.S. will take additional steps to protect our brave service members and others as long as the ICC continues to present a threat to our national interests," the spokesperson said.

SALARIES PAID IN ADVANCE

Sanctions applied to the court as an entity could affect its basic day-to-day operations, from its ability to pay its staff, to its access to bank accounts and routine office software on its computers.

To mitigate the potential damage, ICC staff received salaries this month in advance for the rest of 2025, three sources said, though this is not the first time the court has paid wages in advance as a precaution in case of sanctions.

The court is also seeking alternative suppliers for banking services and software, three sources said.
The ICC, based in The Hague, has indicted Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as figures from the Hamas militant group, for alleged crimes committed during the Gaza war.
Washington has previously targeted court officials with sanctions for their roles in those cases and in a separate investigation into suspected crimes in Afghanistan, which initially had looked at actions by U.S. troops.

ICC STATES PUSH BACK AT UN

Three diplomatic sources said some of the ICC's 125 member countries would try to push back against additional U.S. sanctions during a U.N. General Assembly in New York this week.

But all indications are that Washington will scale up its attack on the ICC, four diplomatic sources in The Hague and New York said.

"The road of individual sanctions has been exhausted. It is now more about when, rather than if, they will take the next step," a senior diplomat said.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called the court "a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare" against the United States and its ally Israel.

The court was founded in 2002 under a treaty giving it jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes that were either committed by a citizen of a member state or had taken place on a member's territory.
Israel and the United States are not members. The court recognizes the state of Palestine as a member and has ruled that this gives it jurisdiction over actions on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States reject this.

In February, the White House imposed sanctions on the court's lead prosecutor, Karim Khan, who had requested the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. Khan is on leave amid an ongoing investigation into sexual misconduct allegations which he denies.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, when you elect a felon as president you should expect him to attack courts.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US is not even part of the ICC though. The rest of us didn't elect him.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would that matter? It's a court, he doesn't like it, and he's attacking it.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, your comment just has a bit of a "what goes around comes around" vibe, when this is the US attacking an institution it has nothing to do with. You could reasonably expect him to attack the rule of law in America first, not starting with fucking it up for the rest of us.

But for sure, nothing surprising about Trump attacking the rule of law and supporting genocide.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, "nothing surprising" is the intent of the comment.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Tell us more about how Israel doesn't control the US Congress.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this the equivalent of a bratty kid saying he's done playing because he suddenly starts to lose?

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

The US was not really playing in the first place. Basically the other kids invited the US to play a game of international justice years ago, the US said "fuck that" and refused to join in, and now they are trying to put fire to the club house.

Thankfully the fact that the US are not parts of the ICC means they have way less leverage. Basically it is a problem to the ICC because they depend on American companies like Microsoft, and companies that want to do business with american companies and are afraid of sanctions.

Going down this route will do incredible harm to US companies as it'll be obvious to everyone that they cannot be trusted.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harris didn’t like trans people tho

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She did backstab trans people after she lost.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

link?

EDIT: I found a link that says she expressed "concerns" about trans athletes after the election, is that the said backstabbing?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don’t care about “fairness” they want to kick out trans people from sports.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I kinda think it's worse. They don't care about trans people at all and are only doing this reversal for political gain.

The scumbag political consultants that constantly hand them losses are now selling them the idea that people don't want to hear about trans issues and that Republicans win on rejecting them so we should join in on it too...

Real genius stuff... Become more Republican so Democrats will vote for you?