this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
481 points (99.6% liked)

World News

49951 readers
4780 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link is to a live feed

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elucubra@piefed.social 78 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Russia invades Ukraine. Sanction the fuck out of Russia.

Israel invades Palestine...

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 34 points 1 day ago

Israel always get a free past. The western leaders are so racist and pathetic.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While selling arms to israel to destroy palestine

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Basically this.

"We recogni~~z~~se Israel's right to invade and destroy the state of Palestine."

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

What does this mean? Are there any meaningful implications or are we just stating the obvious? In a world where Palestine has been occupied for over 50 years, and for some reason it isn't legally called annexation, do these designations mean anything?

Will they have formula diplomatic relations? Will Palestinians finally be able to get valid passports?

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Here is an Australian Broadcasting Company (Aussie ABC, not to be confused with the US/Disney one), explaining what this all means: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-21/australia-recognises-state-of-palestine-two-state-solution/105799276

I don’t want to miss-state what is in the article, but it is a move in part to distance ourselves from the US position, and to help embolden other nations to also do so. With sufficient international backing (Australia is too small to be able to swing things by itself), recognition of a legitimate Palestinian government would include things such as embassies, passports, trade deals etc.

Unfortunately, although our brains have become desensitised over the past decade by over-the-top political bullshit - this is how things used to be handled in a more civilised time.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

I think it's one of those things which technically enables some stuff (embassies or some shit? The reframing of Israel as literally invading another country, rather than committing sins against ppl whose homeland exists but doesn't exist?) but probably won't have much on an impact and is more designed to say 'hehm. Ackshually it is not totally super cool what you guys are doing'. But then we probably continue to sell them components and widgets that ultimately get used in war machines because dude have you seen the way predominantly-English-speaking nations act towards those that aren't? But like I think it as at least something, and will likely have implications of technical legality that make some enablement of Israel more difficult or even impossible as the new setting takes hold. Maybe.

Of course by that time...

But let's hold onto some tiny modicum of hope, because what else is there. Even a teaspoon of water in the desert is better than mouth of sand.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

it's just meant as a signal to american establishment politicians that they should maybe stop betting on a losing horse

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Very little.

Notice that they haven't actually stated for what is the territory of Palestine, even indirectly by saying it is what was defined in past accords.

Now Israel is possibly an invader on the territory of the sovereign nation of Palestine - only possibly because it depends on what is considered the territory of the nation of Palestine, which this doesn't at all define directly of indirectly - this has created with a massive hole to allow claiming that Israel isn't in fact invading Palestine or at least that it's not clear, because Israel can just say that were they are is not the territory of Palestine whilst Palestinians say it is, and legally it hasn't been clarified who is right.

Now, ask yourself: are these people so incredibly incompetent in the field of diplomacy and international law that they didn't spot this, or is it a case that they designed this "recognition" to be exactly as it is - of the existence of a state without defining its territory, thus with massive holes - on purpose?

Even if Israel was deemed to be "invading Palestine", as far as I know in International Law, "invading a sovereign nation" isn't actual as bad an act as "committing Genocide" and Israel has already been deemed as commiting a Genocide by a number of entities, including the UN and is currently breaking the ICCs order to stop certain activities (though I believe the court hasn't yet rulled on their actions amounting to a Genocide or not, but they had issue orders for Israel to stop certain activities).

Now, if Israel isn't being made by the nations that have now "recognized the state of Palestine" to suffer consequences (for example, sanctions) for the greater crime of "commiting Genocide", how likely it is that these very same nations that refuse to punish Israel for that will now punish Israel for the lesser crime of "invasion of a foreign nation"

Again: remember, this is if they actually recognize Israel's actions as an invasion, and without an accepted definition of what exactly is the territory of the nation of Palestine, they can claim that there is no invasion or (more likely, IMHO) that "it's not clear".

To me this just looks like performative smoke & mirrors from politicians who support Israel whilst the public opinion on their nations is heavilly against Israel and their actions, hence why it makes sense that a nation like Britain which is currently doing surveillance flights over Gaza and giving the data to Israel, as well as arresting old ladies as Terrorism Supporters for demonstrating against the Genocide, woud be part of this - it's de facto an action which doesn't hurt Israel whilst being spinned to the British Public Opinion - that demands that "something must be done about Israel" (there was already a demonstration with 500,000 people about it) - as "something is being done".

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

they won't do anything meaninful like put sanctions on israel so it's mainly performative bullshit.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The answer is no for all your questions

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

"what does this all mean?"

"No"

Ok. 🤣

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They still claims that it's Hamas who don't want peace and returning the hostages while it's israel who don't want to. Netenyahu refuse any palestinian state even one without hamas and without the right to an army for self defense because he claim it's their land.

They claim to be horrified about what is happening in gaza while not sanctionning israel, lying about stop selling weapons and not acknowledging the genocide

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hamas is a violent terrorist organization, it just happens to also be the only one even remotely attempting to fight back against Israel's attacks. There are no "good guys" in this war (barring the victims just trying to live their lives), just bad and worse. Israel has been attacking Palestine both physically and via illegally seizing their land for decades, while Hamas has been staging terrorist attacks against Israel for just as long. It's hard not to fault the Palestinian people for supporting Hamas when they're the only ones that are doing literally anything to fight back against Israel, but that also doesn't make Hamas good. At best they're a necessary evil.

Hamas doesn't want peace, they want victory, but Israel doesn't want peace either, they want to finish the genocide they started decades ago. The only ones that actually want peace are the civilians that are stuck between Hamas and the IDF. Unlike Hamas though the international community supports the IDF even though the IDF is just as guilty of staging terror attacks as Hamas is.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hamas sabotaged the Oslo Accords, which were the last viable route to a two state solution. They chose to square off against Bibi and his ilk, certain that their god would hand them victory. They´re not a necessary evil, they condemned the entire region to this madness

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Likud and the settlers bare just as much responsibility for Oslo falling apart as hamas. Probably even more so since they funded hamas in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hamas is an anti colonial resistance movement. The only countries that deem Hamas to be terrorists are the colonial Western powers or their vassals. The rest of the world don't consider them to be terrorists.

Its like calling the Free French army or the Viet Minh terrorists

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They're terrorists because they indiscriminately bomb civilians. If they were an official army they'd be war criminals the same way the IDF are war criminals for also indiscriminately bombing civilians. Anyone who bombs civilians (on purpose) is either a terrorist or a war criminal. People seem to be struggling with this concept that everyone in a conflict can be wrong, even if they have some legitimate grievances with each other.

Israel is absolutely stealing Palestinian land and has been for decades. They need to be evicted and that land returned to the Palestinian people. Palestine needs to be an independent country, Israel has demonstrated that they're incapable of leaving Palestine alone and a hard border between them is the only approach likely to fix that.

Hamas on the other hand has spent decades killing Israeli civilians and even if there was a two state solution would continue to stage attacks on Israel as a significant portion of their members are Islamic extremists (further complicated by support from neighboring Islamic countries that hate the idea of a Jewish state for religious reasons). The problem Palestine faces is that Hamas is the only force they have access to that can do anything against Israel even if that thing is to launch terrorist attacks.

There are strong parallels between Hamas and the IRA, another terrorist organization, but also stark differences. Both organizations have or had legitimate grievances they were responding to, but both also engaged in indiscriminate violence that did little to advance their stated goals. If by some miracle this current war is resolved without the genocide of the Palestinian people (a genocide the current Israeli leadership seems dedicated to) hopefully Hamas disbands the same way the IRA did, but I'm very doubtful of such an outcome, there is far too much religious and ethnic animosity in that region.

In a perfect world Palestine would be its own country, have its own army, and Israel and Palestine would work together to stamp out Hamas. If Israel tried to push into Palestinian territory the Palestinian army would push them back and if it came down to it the Palestinian military and IDF would fight each other. What the Palestinian army wouldn't be doing is murdering random Israeli civilians the way Hamas is (and if they did Palestine would face sanctions for those war crimes the same way Israel should be currently).

All of this is of course made significantly more complicated by the US primarily but also other countries supporting Israel because they have a terrible relationship with the Islamic countries in the region (for both good and bad reasons) and want a friendly country to use as a military outpost. The US has been far too involved with Israel for decades now and they've become far too invested in propping up the current administration (also the US has its own significant issues with its current administration).

Other countries need to stop supporting Israel and sanction them for both their war crimes and their decades of stealing Palestinian land. Hamas needs to be wiped out the same way ISIS does, but not by the IDF who have shown they're incapable of doing so without engaging in even worse atrocities than Hamas commits.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago

Would've been nice if they did this 80 years ago when they started this whole mess

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kind of thought that they all would have assumed we all just forgot about this pledge they'd made last month. Good on the Commonwealth for showing some integrity!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

And let's get to the next step.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I understand this has symbolic significance, but in the end, does it really accomplish anything?

Are any of these countries going to sanction Israel, or... anything?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It's a smoke screen to act like they are not complicit in the genocide

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I'm hoping that all the "stateless" Palestinian refugees in these countries are finally able to obtain some sort of recognition and have an easier time regarding residency.

We'll see, though. The British started this whole fucking show after WWII, this is the least they can do.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 1 day ago

Americans, shut the fuck up. You're not helping as is, don't criticise while your own house is burning down.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-recognize-taiwan

I don't raise this as a tu quoque kind of argument, just saying that Taiwan is a country that has its shit together far better than palestine (functioning government, democracy, no major terrorist organizations, no wars, trading around the world) and only 12 countries in the world have formally recognized it.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago

That's because there was money to be made from doing business with China, and the price was selling out Taiwan for that sweet cheap labor.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They probably don't have oil to steal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Good to set the precedent.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who is following the situation: just some abstract recognition or with some concrete borders?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this rate palestine will no longer exists

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm from Ukraine. We know here perfectly well how passive and slow the world is.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They didn't wait 77 years though to help ukraine against russian invasion. This is not to minimize your suffering or russian crimes

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 7 points 1 day ago

Yes, only 10 years. But Ukraine is in Europe and Palestine is somewhere there. So that hastiness is easily explained.

Good, now blockade Israel and sink the blockade runners.

load more comments
view more: next ›