Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Why did they make a statement to saying they released him if they knew he had kiddie porn?
Did they really release him after the fact then arrest him again?!
This guy also had a weird connection to Ronald Reagan's administration and the 1988 RNC. This is all so fucking weird.
I feel like it just cannot be a coincidence that all these men are pedophiles. Did they try to cover for him and get caught?
I think this is all to save face after Patel made a (bigger) fool of himself on TV claiming they had the shooter when they didnt. This man is the local whackadoo and has restraining orders against him barring him from contacting certain government officials and the LDS church. He was also arrested just after the Boston Marathon bombing for making a post asking the Salt Lake Marathon officials if he could help them place their bombs at the finish line of the race.
It's hard to say though.
I could see that, but also isn't that hard to believe he was there to intentionally help distract after the shooting.
Or hard to believe he's got some connections within the Republican party that would have allowed him to just walk away initially even though he had child porn on his phone.
I seriously doubt he had any connection to the shooter and was just seizing the opportunity to create confusion and disruption as that is his M.O. at public meetings and other events from what is being reported about him.
If you were going to assassinate someone and wanted to get away clean, collaborating with an associate whose job it is to take the blame and get arrested on the spot is just about the dumbest possible option since they could easily give you up while in police custody.
As far as the CP, police may have cloned the contents of his phone and not discovered it until later or perhaps they waited for the prosecutor to decide since the article mentions they were in their underwear in the images, which might not be so cut and dry.
Either way I still think all the publicity around this is just an attempt to save face after they looked like fools. They're coming down hard on whomever they can to make themselves look less inept.
I feel like it just cannot be a coincidence
That's because it isn't a coincidence.
Authorities said an investigation into Zinn led to the discovery of explicit material on his phone, including more than 20 images of children between the ages of 5 and 12. Court records also cite graphic messages in which Zinn admitted to being aroused by the material.
First off, I am in no way, shape or form defending the use of child pornography here ...
but I have to wonder if the authorities are telling the whole truth. I mean how many paedophiles would only have a few pics on their phone?
Never mind the 'authorities' (aka cops) saying he admitted to being aroused by the pics.
It all sounds more than a little sus to me. Time will tell if the charges stand or are dismissed.
I might normally agree, but we are also talking about a guy who just decided to fake a confession to murder on the scene. That was his first impulse. Whatever supposed justification he had for that (which also seems doubtful), it does not fill me with confidence that he is of sound mind and applying reason to his actions. And if he is lucid, it really seems like he's trying to go to jail. Could be trying to get medical care or something along those lines? If that were the case, that might explain both his fake confession and his small collection of CP in his phone.
This sounds like someone sent him CP and he replied to them saying he liked them.
The relatively low number of images compared to most offenders you hear about doesn’t point to a pattern of sustained offending.
It sounds like this guy is seriously weird.
When a bunch of files got leaked from UK intelligence agencies some years back, one of the programs mentioned was one that could essentially frame targets with CP material.
I'm not sure this administration is competent enough to do that, but I'd bet money they got embarrassed and are using some bathtime pic one if his kids sent him of his grandkids.
Then came the forced confession.
Add the fact that the source is Newsweek, and I'm definitely not taking this at face value.
It would be easy for them to do. And everyone would take their word for it.
Character assasination would be pretty effective to preventing more luigis. Would people still think he's hot if he got framed for that??
That's a high-risk "if the president does it, it's not illegal" gambit. Glad it didn't work out for him.
If he runs for president it could still work!
Just when you thought this timeline couldn't get any stupider.