I'd like to see how sharing someone's own public words is disparaging their memory. Isn't that how he'd want to be remembered? Did he recant those words? Because if it is wrong to quote him, that implies those words shame his memory. But then why is it shameful to quote him, but not to speak the words in the first place?
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
747 points (99.5% liked)
News
32233 readers
3816 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To quote Death Cab for Cutie, "he was a bastard in life, thus a bastard in death."
I'm sure this is rhetorical, but in case anyone doesn't know the game plan: they want to exploit the sudden uptick in people looking into Kirk to draw more people into his ideology, which works best if the newcomer thinks he was well liked and respected.
If someone sees his true beliefs from the beginning, they'll be more likely to see it for the putrid vomit that it is, but if they first believe he was an intellectual free-thinker brutally murdered for speaking the truth, they may give his bigotry more weight when they stumble upon it later.
Years ago I was banned from the politics subreddit for quoting the constitution articles on treason. This was during Trump's first term.
Sounds like a slam dunk wrongful termination suit, though now that rag gets even more raggedy
I don't have faith that the courts will rule wrongful termination for telling the truth, the defence will simply cite all the ways that move damages their reputation and call that cause.
I don't know if it is, it absolutely should be. But I don't know if it is. Republicans and Democrats have so weakened labor power. And I'm sure the owners will try to point out something in the contract that justifies them doing this no matter how bullshit it is.
It’s really funny watching American corporate power fight federal regulation for decades only to immediately line up behind an authoritarian government to obey in advance the whims of a babbling narcissist who is purposely crashing the economy to satisfy his need for egotistical revenge. If all of our speech is tied up in media companies bought and paid for by corporate interests, or social media tech giants that deliver surveillance data to the government at will with our own tax dollars, how can it possibly even approach being “free”? It cannot, and that is pretty much the goal.
Retaliation just for quoting Kirk, a man who built a media and legal influencing juggernaut on his protected speech, is especially ironic given the great efforts made to develop and spread his ideas.
crashing the economy
The stock market is doing great. The ownership class is lining up behind Trump because he's making them billions and they just need to stroke his ego a little bit.
The same Washington Post that reported with 100% confidence that the shooter was definitely, absolutely trans? And still hasn’t redacted their lies?
Watching the media try to whitewash this piece of shit is a real mask-off moment for them.
All media is currently Fascist, trust nothing from any news organization. It’s all carefully crafted to shift the national conversation ever more to the right.
load more comments
(6 replies)
The Washington Post is really trying to become the New York Post
It’s owned by Bezos. Nuff said!
I honestly don't know why anyone who isn't a right wing ball licker even looks sideways at either of those shit rags. They aren't news outlets, they're propaganda distribution hubs for the neo-nazi right.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Anyone wanna bet she will be replaced by a white conservative dude?
No thanks, I'd rather keep my money
load more comments
(1 replies)
Washington post is owned by Jeff Bezos, no?
Affirmative, and it went downhill quick
democracy dies in darkness
They need to make the slogan true
They still haven't fixed that typo! It's supposed to be "died" now.
load more comments
(2 replies)
apparently this piece of shit is gonna get a funeral service at football stadium. What a fucking joke
Condolences to Karen for the BS firing. On the topic of "shit charlie says", here's his wikiquote entry. (https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk) I love going on wikiquote because it acts as a summary of texts & thinkers that I don't have the time to read. I say this because normally wikiquote is full of very aspirational quotes, but Charlie's is very abysmal AND it's recent too! These aren't old quotes. These are from as early as this year. His anti-feminist quote ("Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You're not in charge.") was uttered in 2025. His anti-black and anti-civil rights comments were made last year in 2024. ("I'm sorry, if I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified." January 2024.)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Isnt wapo bezos' bragger
Welp. I had cancelled after the last debacle, but resubbed on an extremely cheap offer.
I guess I'll have to cancel again.
She should do the Bari Weiss thing and say she's being silenced because they're scared of her speaking truth.
view more: next ›