this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
377 points (98.2% liked)

News

32220 readers
2395 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, conservatives on the court have claimed to be “colorblind.” Yet when it comes to criminalizing our communities, suddenly race matters. This is the contradiction at the heart of the Roberts Court: no race in college admissions, but race is admissible in immigration stops.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gee I wonder if there will be any ICE presence near voting/polling locations in swing states? I just wonder.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the most likely 2026 election rigging method. Mass arrests at polling places and then watch the nonwhite turnout plummet

[–] Bonifratz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago

And it's so easy to sell to the MAGA base, too. "The Democrat Marxists want to let billions and billions of illegals vote, so we just HAVE to put officers in front of polling stations and arrest a bunch of brown people to sAvE oUr DeMoCrAcY!"

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm light-skinned, but my wife and kids are brown. I don't want them living in a country where I can vote without fear, but they can't.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 45 minutes ago

Don't worry, in the following election you won't be able to vote without fear either!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not just swing states. Texas and Florida elections are going to be extremely unpleasant this coming cycle.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not even just Mexicans, but Mexican-looking people (aka Latino).

But it's not just license to hunt Latino looking people either. The stay was not on that population specifically. The stay was on arresting people on the suspicion based off of any of these henious criminal factors:

  • Existing while non-white (this can include Black/African/Caribbean, East Asian, South Asian, Middle Eastern, and Native Americans)
  • Waiting for a bus
  • Looking for work
  • Working at a car wash, a recycling centre or on a farm
  • Speaking English with a foreign-sounding accent
  • Speaking Spanish (which could be any langauge to a cop that can't tell foreign languages apart)

No visible minority is safe from this.

[–] tim@infosec.pub 44 points 1 day ago

No one* is safe from this. They'll twist this and other rulings to make it so they can easily discard the rights of anyone against the MAGAt regime.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just latino. Anyone with slightly darker skin, including indigenous people.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Anyone brown, feminist, LGBTQIA ANYONE they don’t like. They’re also calling for war and violence against anyone who is left Of the crazy maga cult

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This was a little too prescient.

collapsed inline media
Image description: a still from the movie Civil War from Alex Garland. Jesse Plemons intimidating militant character stand with a gun, asking “Okay, what kind of American are you?”

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I’ve been thinking about that movie a lot lately. It does seem possible that it turns out to be prophetic

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The real problem in this Sept. 8 decision is that the Supreme Court justices are now saying the quiet part aloud: Brown skin is a problem to be policed. And that leaves us with a dangerous question—can a country built on such contradictions hold together when its highest court openly sanctions racism against millions of its own people?

I don't think it can or maybe it is that I don't want to think about a preservation of so much suffering in an unnatural state of cruelty because it is too cynical.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This country has never been the place we were taught to believe it was. I think we started to come close to reshaping it into that image, though; this offended the parasitic ultra wealthy sociopaths, so they put Trump in power to remind us of "our proper place".

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They couldn't have put Trump in power without the help of the American electorate.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

American citizens are inundated with propaganda. In fact, we always have been. The voters are given plenty of involuntary help to make sure they make the right decision.

Don't get me wrong, the willful ignorance is infuriating. But focusing on that won't do ~~anything~~ much to address the root issues, I'm afraid.

collapsed inline media

Edit: changed a word

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of us wanted and still want that country to exist

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely! And that's why I won't give up hope.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Well that gives me a little hope

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America is a slaver state and shouldn't hold together. This is out permission slip to remake society from the ground up

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

ooo, in the new society can I be the Comptroller overseeing distribution of Gummi Bears on the west side? I really like gummi bears

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

The decisions of the Supreme Court really have less and less to do with the constitution—now apparently only in the sense that they contradict it in a grotesque manner.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

My inability to tan is no longer a laughing joke.

I'm privileged to be a wasp, but more specifically, I literally cannot tan. I'm not albino. I'm just pale. now have a privilege that not even everyone in my family has.

My dad is a wasp, but tans really easy. In Missouri and Indiana, he's been profiled already like this. Over a decade ago too. Black hair, tan skin. That's it. That's all that does it.

There's a very disturbing plan here. It makes the Nazi racial policies seem tame.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 9 points 15 hours ago

Discrimination Exclusion Inequality

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 19 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yet again: The ICE is slowly become the SS

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Slowly?! it has not even been a year!

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago

yeah… that's actually correct

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Feels like 10.

It is already.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Wtf California, Oregon and Washington time to step up!

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

What I don’t understand is how 46 % of Latino voters voted for trump

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They're stupid. Source: I have stupid extended family in the US voting for him

[–] daizelkrns@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Can confirm. I'm from Mexico and also have stupid family in the US voting republican, specially idolizing the orange idiot

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

My bil called a friend of mine communist scum on Facebook because they posted an opinion on Charlie Kirk. It wasn't even celebration. It was just a solid detailed opinion. He called her communist scum.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

A big part of it is selection bias. 46% of Latino voters != 46% of Latino residents, by a long shot.

The Latinos that have the right to vote tend to be wealthier, more educated and professionalized, and more inclined towards the "Law & Order" and "Anti-Communist" political rhetoric of the Republican Party than their undocumented or unregistered peers. Add to that, during the 1980s and 90s, you had a lot of post-USSR collapse Latin American refugees fleeing countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua that no longer had Soviet support. Those that could legally move to the US typically worked for big American businesses (oil companies, most notably) with their own Reagan/Bush era conservative socio-economic attitudes. Pile in that a lot of these migrant communities have a vested interest in the Republican Party as a tool of patronage - Cubans in Florida have accrued all sorts of special legal privileges precisely because the GOP sees them as a staunch, loyal voting block. And then right-wing press in these communities fuels the anti-communist (and anti-LGBTQ, anti-Black/East Asia, anti-Liberal) politics.

So you're really whittling down the pool of Latinos who get to become legal citizens, the Latinos who get to register to vote, the Latinos who are invited to join the upper class and eventually participate in local/state/national politics, the Latinos who get to participate in national network journalism, and the Latinos who are rich enough to serve as patrons for the next political class.

Eventually, everyone looks like some combination of Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Jeff Bezos.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

Most people never see a single thing any politician ever says that isn't a sound byte on their favorite news source. I bet if you asked a large group of people if they have ever watched an political speech in its entirety that 98% would say no.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

People are idiots... in every shape, color, and size.

[–] Waldelfe@feddit.org 1 points 32 minutes ago

I don't know Latino Trump voters, but I know immigrant AfD voters here in Germany and I assume their reasoning is similar:

  1. They don't mean us, they mean only the criminal immigrants. I work here and speak German.
  2. Well they could never go after all of us, that would be stupid! Entire industries depend on immigration and would collaps. So you see how their rhetoric is exaggerated.
  3. All politicians lie, that's what politicians do. They never do what they say, so the AfD will never act against immigrants.
  4. They are against gay people! I don't care about the rest. I habe a good job and speak fluent German, so I'll be fine. As long as they go after gay people, I don't care for any other policy.

And so on. The point is, every single non-native or non-native-looking voter of fascist parties thinks they are the exception.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago

Any doubts that Trump is "America's Hitler" should now be put to bed.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 56 minutes ago

This is the contradiction at the heart of the Roberts Court: no race in college admissions, but race is admissible in immigration stops.

Not a contradiction at all when you know the motive. If something hurts non-white people, it's what they choose.