this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
1205 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

9431 readers
2862 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Too many people pearl clutching today over worries of retributive violence, as if the fascists aren't already going to be committing that violence on us in the near future regardless. It's not too early to say that this scumbag deserved much worse and I'm glad he got rocked so publicly. Mods I'll understand if you delete this and I'm truly sorry for the trouble if you do, I just need a personal break today from the media cacophony of liberals collectively reconciling with the realization that we live in an abnormally and horrifically violent society.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 168 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Imagine leading a life where millions are giddy over your death.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I literally cannot recognize Charlie Kirk without his tiny face shrunken slightly further down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Some bring joy wherever they go… others, whenever they go

[–] jokersteve@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Like when Henry Kissinger died and every second city in South America had celebratory parties?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mgnome@piefed.social 119 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I feel like THIS is retributive violence. Democratic politicians were earlier shot dead in their homes, so I'd say that republicans (who are themselves endorsing political violence) shouldn't be able to feel safe either.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 75 points 2 days ago (13 children)

The Republicans are only going to talk about violence against them. They have a victim mentality and Charlie boy is now a martyr.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Kirk promoted gun violence to justify the 2nd amendment. It would be poetic justice if the killer was someone whose loved one died from gun violence and chose to give him a taste of his own opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

Bruh... We are in for an explosion of political violence... Only difference between now and the past is white wealthy men are the targets. Watching them freak out when they are gunned down on a random Wednesday is laughable. Welcome to your average black Americans reality. Police killings are political violence but no one with actual power ever gave a shit.

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i switched over from reddit recently and this post makes me here to stay. Got a loud laugh out of me after reading all the undeserved sympathy this guy was getting.

I've been wondering for awhile now - at what point do ppl just start killing these fucking ppl. I guess that's today. Hopefully this a lesson/reminder in why you don't treat your fellow man like fucking dogshit, cause they just might tear your fucking throat out!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (21 children)

I feel for all the people who will have to live with the fear and trauma of witnessing this. I’m glad nobody else was hurt. This type of violence is a consequence of our gun-obsessed and highly politically polarized culture, which Kirk had a massive hand in making worse. I hope we can focus on the damage his rhetoric has caused and those who were taken in by him can use this as a learning moment.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (4 children)

dude had a big face or small face depending on how you define face, i see why the shooter didn't want to overcomplicate and went for the neck

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 61 points 2 days ago

If he got shot in the head - no vital organs would've been hit tho.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 26 points 2 days ago

If they were shooting at the face, they would have misjudged the distance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cm0002@piefed.world 56 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 98 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It was while he was being asked about gun violence that he was shot, the student says.

Unbelievable.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 105 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Specifically, he was in the middle of spinning a question about mass shootings into a dog whistle about "gang violence".

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

mass shootings committed by trans people, specifically

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 96 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

The order of events as I've been seeing online:

Videos circulating on social media showed an attender at the student event on Wednesday asking Charlie Kirk: “Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?”

In response, Kirk said: “Too many,” as the crowd clapped.

In a follow-up question, the attender asked: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?”

Kirk replied: “Counting or not counting gang violence?”

His last act on earth was cracking a joke about how only queers and poors are involved in gun violence, at which point he was shot.

[–] icylobster@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for extra context. These people really don't seem to care about others suffering. Also I don't normally hear gang violence and mass shooters together. Gang violence is generally targeted and not focused on the most amount of bodies.

Regardless I'm getting tired of this all, and it's likely only beginning.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a regularly used debate tactic of the right. He was going to imply that whatever number the student came up with for mass shootings was inflated because the criteria was too vague and erroneously counts gang violence. He would then have used this to simultaneously downplay the seriousness of mass shootings and suggest that trans people represent a larger proportion of mass shooters than they actually do. It was his way of discrediting the argument that the student was making; that trans people are actually underrepresented in the population of mass shooters. The reason for the student making this argument - if you don't know - is that Charlie Kirk has blamed trans people for mass shootings in the past, jumping on the conservative bandwagon that always transvestigates mass shooters because they believe they are a trans conspiracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 17 points 2 days ago

I think it was the asker who also said "great." sarcastically when gang violence was mentioned (just before the shot), adding to the timing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

Some of you will die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to hhh-uh-kkuggg...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have to admit, the Republicans were right about the second amendment. We need to be (legally) buying guns and (legally) protesting with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

Fountain of blood is an understatement. It looked like special effects. The guy went out like a DOOM villain. He died gargling on his own blood.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

They’re already committing violence. It’s just directed against brown people, we shouldn’t forget that. The level they expand and escalate it to is what’s up for debate.

[–] Baked86@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The onion had a good headline, 'Charlie Kirk loses gun control debate by a longshot'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Lol.

So long asshole.

Ran your mouth one day too long.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't know a lot about him, I'm not US American.

I condemn violence in general but a person like him who helps polarize society, pours oil in the fire etc. may just reap what he sowed.

That's what you get, with culture war nonsense and playing sides of the political spectrum against each other. Strange to assume this would just stay rhetoric.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dude, I watched a youtube video of local news stations reporting over the shooting. The youtube comments are completely deranged and 100% written by AI. Somehow charlie kirk is being equated to MLK Jr.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

collapsed inline media

I give up. Are they gonna post the answer later? How does this work?

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Oh no, anyway

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s ironic to mention retributive violence while advocating against people’s rights to be armed to defend themselves.

Nobody is advocating for murder or murderers. While I dislike reddit, /r/DGU is typically very illustrative as to why it’s so important.

I hope - sincerely - to never need to defend myself or my family.

That doesn’t mean you get to disarm me so that some murderers can ignore the law and kill people anyway.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm a pro-2A gun owner, I suspect you may not be reading the meme the way I intended / expected.

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›