this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
167 points (99.4% liked)

News

32098 readers
2936 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Clarence Thomas salivating at another motorcoach "gratuity."

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes. Uncle Thomas wants a new cabin.

[–] teft@piefed.social 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This the type of shit that makes me believe in simulation theory. The one uncle tom acting motherfucker on the bench is actually named tom.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Nominative Determinism is sus at best.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

No time to explain, Morty! Just run real fast and do math in your head.

Honestly, if we had known that all you need to do to bribe an SC justice was to give them a fucking RV and consistently refer to it as a “gratuity”, we could have gotten in front of a whole fucking lot of the problems we’re facing now

[–] Prezhotnuts@lemmy.ca 60 points 6 days ago (3 children)

What is interesting, if unsuccessful Trump has to pay back all those tariffs. These were paid for by companies and passed on to consumers. Guess who is getting the refunds?

What an amazing way to transfer more wealth to companies.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure every company refunded will cut every citizen checks to compensate, I mean, they just want what's fair 🙄

(Also, the bingo square "tariffs are overturned but companies don't lower their prices" is a freebie in the center.)

[–] fiftyfour@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago

And they’ll also certainly lower the prices to pre-tariff levels!

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

FWIW, it hit small lifestyle businesses like mine too, and we didn’t raise our prices to compensate. But I know we’re probably the outlier there.

[–] Prezhotnuts@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine most business owners were like you, community over profits.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 6 days ago

The rent still has to be paid, etc

[–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago

What’s going to be really fun is the giant hole the lack of tariff income blows in his already shitty budget. He was counting on that cash to offset his tax cuts for the rich. Get ready for some turbo inflation.

[–] cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Of course he is. It feels like the economy is already fucked either way.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It definitely is. A lot of countries try to reduce their dependence on the US. Even if the current administration is no longer in office, the damage will be done and a lot of it will be permanent.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Much of our value was our stability and reliability. Every previous administration was aware of this.

The current administration just wants to get personally rich. It's such a short-sighted and stupid goal for a country's leadership.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The current administration just wants to get personally rich.

They don't just want to get personally rich. They also want to gut every policy, office, and department that could keep the country safe and solvent. They also want to ruin our relationships with all our allies in the world. They want to get personally rich and ruin the country so Putin can pull a Red Dawn and we'll be too weak to fight back.

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Whatever decision the scotus makes, the damage already done is incalculable. Which was the point. Of course they want all their outlandish executive orders to just become the law, but even if challenged and struck down, the damage done by each EO is severe, and taken collectively may be permanent

Edit- which is like the back up plan for the Trump admin; yeah let’s try to have all this crazy bullshit become law, but even if it doesn’t, we kind of get what we want- which is total loss of faith in the US government, and chaos

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

None of this matters anymore. He has caused so much chaos and damage, it's going to take months or years to recover from this.

His tariffs have always been illegal and honestly, no company should have paid them. My company is losing thousands every shipment because of these random and stupid tariffs, i can only imagine the hundreds of thousands other companies are paying in tariff's alone.

The supreme court is owned by the GOP, so they will side with him and the country will continue to freefall into a massive depression.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it’s going to take months or years to recover from this.

Try a couple generations. If we're lucky.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The dollar might never recover, if you really wanna see what Trump has caused check how the dollar value against other major currencies has declined in the past 4 months.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

It will never recover. As countries stop using the dollar to trade it all comes back and creates hyperinflation. And there's no reason to believe that they would go back to the dollar for any reason. This shit is permanent.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Just switch to the Canadian dollar, you won't even hav to change the name of your currency.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

SCOTUS responds by putting on knee pads and sucking Trump's micro pedo penis.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Pageantry. This is just another method of stalling them for another round of pump and dumps.

Since the appeals are letting the terrifs in place,..we will know how they will rule on how fast they take it

Slow walk: "they're going rule in his favor."

Instant emergency pickup: "they may potentially strike them down."

Think about it, there's no downside for letting this sit here since the tariffs are continuing

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Watch as the ruling is going to come down to saying Trump is allowed unless Congress votes to block either the declaration of emergency or the actual EO.

The end goal here is to centralise power - that is the GOP SCOTUS goal. There is no way Roberts doesn't justify this action by Trump.

They are enablers - Roe v Wade was just a test of what the US people would accept and to gauge their reaction