this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
226 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10426 readers
710 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. We all know the difference between the items in 1 and 2.

Yeah, that's not how laws work. You can't write a broadly applicable law, and then say "You know what it really means."

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unsure if Shakespeare is now porn.

Will jerk to twelfth night and report back tomorrow if paper cuts aren't too severe.


Actual questions: is a mental image caused by a book an image? How will they define image? What is pornograph-y/ic? Is sex ed / biology exempt?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Shakespeare was always porn.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

The bible should be taken out of Alberta because of this law. All the incest, rape, sex, murder, genocide, etc. in that book is amazing.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Typical Danielle Smith bullshit.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Cheeto Pedo worshipper Smith? Of course.

But the strings get pulled by an org much the same as the Heritage Foundation called Take Back Alberta. She's their lapdog.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So I'm allowed to jerk off in the theater?

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Banning 1984 is insane to me. You have to be either so stupid that you decided it should be banned but completely missed the point of the book, or you have to be straight up cartoon levels of evil.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This was more a case of malicious compliance. Province said "give us a list of books you have that meet these stupid criteria" and the school boards took their amateurishly worded MO and produced a list that met that criteria.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Malicious compliance can mean finding ways to make a good law cause problems out of some other grievance, or it can be exposing how bad a law is by following it to its logical conclusion in a public and dramatic way. This is the latter, like those groups trying to get the bible removed in southern states with these kind of laws. It’s not about the bible, it’s about showing how bad book bans are.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Literally 1984.

It doesn't even make sense if they want to ban "inappropriate" books on sex ed. The only reason to ban 1984 is because deep down they know they're building Ingsoc

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

1984 was dropped from Ontario curriculum in 1984. My English teacher told us this and then quit at the end of the year. After that, there was only a stupid focus on Shakespeare.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Can't think of a better advertisement for 1984 though, kids might actually read it these days thinking its an "illegal" book.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

"He banned Fahrenheit 451 which is a book about banning books."

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh shit, we didn't want to bad old books, we just wanted to ban queer books! Hang on a minute while our lawyers figure out a better way to encode "we hate gays" in legal jargon.

– the government of Alberta

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Don't be like US