this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
518 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

76609 readers
2461 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'll take an 8k computer monitor though. In fact, send two. Kthnx.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

And yet people want 4k screens on phones and 13in tablets...

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My viewing position is about 330cm/11ft from the wall where my tv is mounted. That works out to roughly 80” television for 4K viewing pleasure. https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship

8k would be ridiculous, and the compression would be a significant factor.

Remember when ISP companies went after people who used over 500GB in a month? I remember.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want a new fucking 3D TV. I'm so mad every single manufacturer gave up on that.

Yes, a lot of 3D content was awful, headache-inducing, and bad... But tons of it was done very well and looks amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hear anything at or above 8k resolution negates the need for anti aliasing entirely... But I feel that my pc would would be running at or around 10-15 fps for most games I would care about anti aliasing on.

Nice in theory, definitely can't handle that many pixels in reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cynar@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Uncompressed 1080 is already approaching the eyes resolution limit, when viewing it in a living room environment. 4K is close to the monitor usage limit.

The reason that 4K seems better is often down to bandwidth and colour depth.

There's zero benefit to an 8K TV. An 8K monitor might be useful, but is still well into the diminishing returns curve.

There's still some ground to be made up with colours and frame rates, but resolution is effectively maxed out already.

[–] winni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I found quite some 4k movies being more noisy than their 2k pendant. So whats the point?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Gotta get people to replace their tvs somehow so dangle an "upgrade".

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago

Makes sense:
No Media support.
And also on Monitors and Tvs i don't care if it's a. 1080p or 1440p of 4k give me 1080p

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›