this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
999 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74565 readers
3939 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 266 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The infuriating part of the Google enshittification process is that there is absolutely nothing the user can do about it.

Literally the only thing that motivates Google is profit. Controlling side-loaded apps will almost certainly boost their profits by a infinitesimal fraction of a percent, therefore it will be done. Even if consumer uproar causes Google to back down in the short term, they'll simply implement this a few months later. Late-stage Capitalism sucks.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 132 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (39 children)

You can stop using all Google products. Now I understand their market share on the web means they’re going to continue to shape the web.

But make no mistake. There is something, however small, that you can do. De-Google.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (40 children)

I will help hand hold anyone who wants to build servers or services (to the best of my ability) to replace Google services with their own.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

You can stop using all Google products.

My public school -- that my children are basically required by law to attend, remember -- is badgering me to sign a consent form so they can have Chromebooks.

This fight is a lot fucking larger than mere individual boycotts!

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And my kids school requires every parent to have a Google account to track progress and share information.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 44 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

De-Google

The complaint is side loading is being restricted and the only long term alternative Apple. Google already began the process of shutting down Graphene by cutting drivers out of AOSP.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-not-killing-aosp-3566882/

[–] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Hang on, as somebody who knows enough to be looking into switching to graphene, but not entirely enough to know what AOSP is, what exactly is happening?

Am I going to fuck myself over? If I do end up switching to a custom rom? Should I just wait on the Linux community to build something better?

All I want is a working device that isn't selling all my shit to Mark Zuckerberg

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

G is restricting the factory images/source (I believe) that graphene uses to build their system, so they are having to work backwards, take more time, etc. It's a shitty thing to do but afaik it's not a blocker. I'm typing this on a gos pixel 8 pro right now.

Linux phones are still in their infancy, and are pretty shit if you need anything more than the ability to call and text (sms) on specific carriers (limitations applies to the USA, AUS, and a couple more I believe). I have a pinephone 1st gen and it's... Cool for messing with, absolutely, but jesus christ it's painful to actually attempt to use. I bought that 3y ago and not much has changed, from videos I've seen (my pinephone screen is lifting and failing so...). From a developer - like, bringing Linux to the phone platform - sure, grab one. As a user, unless you understand that you very likely will not daily this device (or any similar device) because shit just doesn't work/isn't ready and are OK with that... No, don't. A few more years, maybe.

[–] eodur@piefed.social 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

GrapheneOS is still moving ahead albeit slower, as you said. They are also working on a deal with a phone manufacturer to bring a more secure phone to market. I dunno whether it will just meet the same security levels of the Pixels and ship with stock Android, or if it will be a full GrapheneOS Phone. I'm hoping for the latter, but it will more likely be the former. Fingers crossed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

You can stop using all Google products.

That may be true for you, but other people face different realities. When Google implements the sideloading block it will eventually be pushed to everyone who doesn't use a custom ROM.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Its about time an open standard happened for mobile OSes.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's what Android was and they keep trying to undo that any way they can

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 40 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

We need a new one that isn't made by a for-profit company that only was good at the beginning to get total market saturation before flipping the enshittification switch to maximize those profits.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

We need open bootloader and drivers for phones to make any real progress on this. This is what's holding back all initiatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 19 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

the best outcome for the short term would be to forcibly take away android from google and give it to an independent foundation. as I heard antitrust proceedings in the usa were heading that way a few months ago

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I don't know about anyone else, but I got into computers at a young age because it gave me a sense of control over something. I didn't understand everything, but I could do a lot of trial and error, read things and experiment, build cool things, and I shared a sense of community with some random internet strangers based on that knowledge.

In a world where we are so powerless in so many other ways, why did we insist on bringing that power dynamic into the new bright tech sphere? Why did we have to do that? (N.B. this is rhetorical questioning).

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the new Alien Earth TV show, 5 corporations basically run everything.. unfortunately I suspect thats where we are headed as a species.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are at least two generations of us who are disappointed at the contrast between tech's possibilities as envisioned decades ago and the corporate surveillance crap we have to put up with today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 23 hours ago

We, as in the average every day people, didn't do shit. The corporations that make the shit we use are the ones who got us here. The only thing the people using the devices and software are guilty of is not making a fuss about losing control over the stuff becsuse the average person does not care that deeply about the tools and likely doesn't even know about a good 75% of what was lost.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mika@sopuli.xyz 66 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

When reading cyberpunk lore, quickhacks didn't make any sense to me. Some programs that break cyberware because of backdoors, but why would people install cyberware with backdoors?

Now I look at the sad state of mobile market and, yeah ok, that makes sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 52 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Easily the most disgusting company in the planet and it’s funny that their old motto/slogan was ”Don’t be evil”.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 51 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Are you kidding me? How am I supposed to live in this damn Orwellian society that is coming?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 41 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

The EU's been breathing down Apple's neck for them trying to do similar shit, so i find the timing kinda weird.
Plus they'd need to force-update their spyware first, i wonder how many versions of android they're willing to go back.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 15 points 11 hours ago

I think the update is already installed, just waiting for the kill switch.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] flemtone@lemmy.world 37 points 14 hours ago (37 children)

Already using GrapheneOs on my phone, so fuck Google.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Wait until Google locks the bootloader.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] markko@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Sucks that it only works on devices made by Google though..

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] generator@lemmy.zip 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

they just want to confirm a malicious actor didn’t develop it

So Newpipe, SmartTube, Nintendo emulators...

Clones of opensource apps bundled with ads that violates license is OK, but restricting everyone to build and test apps from source so it can test new features and report any issues is too risky for the user

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suodrazah@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bluecat_OwO@lemmy.world 33 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

now it's just a race for the giant conglomerates to make the worst decisions for consumers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

What's my better option at this point?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And they can suckle upon my peener.

I'll go to Graphine or something else before I let the company for whom "don't be evil" was too bold a statement dictate my fuckin' choices.

I already ditched Windows. Can't be that hard to cut Google out too.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Graphene has locked itself to google hardware, and google can cripple them at any point by stopping bootloader unlocks. We need to go deeper, or aim higher as it were

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

As shitty as M$ is, it would have been nice to see Windows phone become moderately successful and be a third primary mobile os.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 18 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Year of the Linux phone, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 14 points 18 hours ago

chrome is at thier limits, since people can just use a different browser/

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 13 hours ago

google is pissed people were deleting that spying app on android phones, plus thier constant attack on adblocking on youtube wasnt working to well. since samsung and iphones pretty much walled in thier os, why not google.

load more comments
view more: next ›