this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
946 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74565 readers
3952 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 99 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Its about time an open standard happened for mobile OSes.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 79 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

That's what Android was and they keep trying to undo that any way they can

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 40 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

We need a new one that isn't made by a for-profit company that only was good at the beginning to get total market saturation before flipping the enshittification switch to maximize those profits.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

why do we need a new one? can't android be salvaged? lots of things have been solved already in a way that makes a relatively good foundation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

All the non-Google entities that build stuff on Android need to start banding together instead of siloing themselves. If AOSP is being closed, they need to create a non-profit replacement for it.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 7 points 6 hours ago

The fucked up part is nowadays third parties like banks or sometimes even governments make apps rely on Google services, so you can't use an ungoogled phone for stuff you actually need for life...

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

right! I never understood why isn't there more cooperation between different foss roms, at least sharing patches and coordinating some work.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I guess if Google closes down AOSP it would get forked, and the fork would probably be a separate thing from the current Android distributions. So that the landscape would continue to look a bit like today, except that AOSP would be an independent thing.

Then I guess it's possible that Google would seek to make android apps incompatible, gradually making the whole thing kinda pointless. I can't say I'm using Android for the great UX - I'm using it because it supports a few apps I continue to be forced to use. If I can't use them on Android any more I'm switching to Ubuntu Touch or PostmarketOS in a heartbeat.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Makes me curious if they think their monopoly or whatever they were called cases making them split their browser are going to go though. If you are going to have to sell parts of the company, now would be the time to hammer home any last minute bad things that would make the companies more profitable. Shows higher income for the sale, and gets it out of the way so the new purchaser doesn't look like the ones who did it, but rather the ones who will make announcements on how they will review things to make them better for the user base.

Doesn't mean they'll follow through on them, but it takes the evil and sticks it with the old owners.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I disagree. Google has always been a thinly veiled Microsoft. A wolf in sheeps clothing. They embrace, extend, extinguish. It's the same thing.

[–] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

We need open bootloader and drivers for phones to make any real progress on this. This is what's holding back all initiatives.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 15 hours ago

and many phone manfacterers, issuers(non google, samsung, or IOs) IS CONSIDERING locking down thier phones.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if the generic tablets with made up Asian sounding names that you see on the big marketplaces could work? They could have slightly larger or smaller screens if they're cheaper than current phone screens, and could have Linux with something like Signal on them for calling.

They'd probably be lower quality to begin with, but could potentially get better if people start to buy them. They seem to have generic hardware, so might be able to offer the drivers and unlockable bootloaders too :)

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

I'd be worried about vulnerabilities.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 19 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

the best outcome for the short term would be to forcibly take away android from google and give it to an independent foundation. as I heard antitrust proceedings in the usa were heading that way a few months ago

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

And he's very easily bribed which corporations have caught onto.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Such things are solvable with a bribe in the USA.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

So basically remove Google integration from AOSP?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

FuriOS? Linux-based and runs Android apps.

https://furilabs.com/

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not bad, it looks like I have to buy their phone though. Which is not cheap, or performant guessing by the specs despite what the advertising says.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I saw someone else recommending it. I only hope they take this opportunity to release the OS for everyone, but since they're for-profit, I doubt they will.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Interesting. I've not heard of FuriOS, but if it is a Linux phone that actually can be used with US carriers, makes calls and supports SMS/MMS, and can do VoLTE that's a actually a pretty big deal.

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Whenever you see a linux phone advertise both security and android app support, you should be wary, since it's likely waydroid or a waydroid fork, and their design goal of running android in a container instead of a VM has lead to some interesting security decisions.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I would be very happy if anyone could explain to me in a simple and coherent way why I, as a normal user who am aware of what I am doing on my device and am not targeted by any group that's out to get me, would need a "hardened malloc", "secure app spawning", "vanadium browser and webview", or a "hardened PDF viewer". The last of these four is the only thing that means anything to me, and it sounds dumb. Yeah, I know PDFs can be dangerous if you open random shit, but come on.

If I run Waydroid it's only to get my banking app (trusted source) and Whatsapp (not a trusted source but not directly malware either) working. I hardly need their hardened PDF reader.

[–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not just your two android apps, any program on your system that is aware of your waydroid installation could potentially use it as a path to escalate themselves to root, which is generally regarded as a bad outcome. If you don't care about that kind of thing, or don't think that could ever happen to you, that's certainly within your rights to hold such a viewpoint.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Interesting. Thanks for sharing!

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Still using Android 11? Holy hell.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago

You realize how many things have gotten shittier since android 11? Accubattery isn't even allowed to monitor everything using up juice any more. You can't customize your own charging curves, you're locked out of accessing portions of your storage on your own phone, and a lot of great power user apks had to completely hit themselves or just stop working all together.

What do you need from after 11 that an apk wouldn't have allowed you to do already?