They said in the hearing today that there wasn't anything classified in there.
I say that he releases it completely unredacted and see what they say about it then.
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
294 points (99.7% liked)
politics
22497 readers
2599 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Exactly my thought when I heard that. I was like then there wont be an issue releasing them. I love how they all did not answer a thing during the hearing as well, at least Hilary had the guts to answer the questions during the Benghazi hearing.
The White House has denied war plans were texted to the group, and Hegseth on Monday denied the reporting as well, calling Goldberg “a deceitful and highly discredited, so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again.”
Fuck it, I say call their bluff and release it.
Will he be the first journalist to disappear?
Nah. He is just going to trip and fall out a window.
No, ICE already kidnapped political prisoners from Colombia journalism school
I thought it was quite clear in the Atlantic article that there were references to undercover or active agents and that leaking that information would put them in danger. Also on another note I was thinking about today, am I crazy or did Trump leak some text or messages in his first administration that led to the deaths of active intelligence agents? I can't seem to find anything about it.
Trumps first administration saw an unheard of amount of CIA Agent deaths, and has been alluded to the fact that Trump gave that info to Putin and other foreign enemies. And by unheard of, I mean that literally. The CIA rarely, if ever, announces assets have died, and the fact that they announced that dozens of assets around the world disappeared, is insane, because the only way this could have happened at this magnitude, would be if someone gave a list to an enemy of the US.
trump did leak on TV the classified keyhole satellite photos of an Iranian rocket test. It wasn't so much the rocket that was classified, but the release of the picture showed resolution not thought possible with spy satellites in orbit at the time. So what he did was tell all our enemies what we could see from orbit of theirs.
If he was gonna, he would have. I hope I'm wrong.
Didn’t he say that he deleted everything once he verified that the texts were real? I haven’t read the article yet, but the title seems peculiar
Edit: now, having read the article, my question persists
I believe he said that he logged out of the chat as soon as he verified the texts were real, and that the texts in the chat were set to auto-delete in 1 to 4 weeks (different texts set to expire at different times).
As the other commenter said, he left the chat. No way he didn't vigorously archive every aspect of the chat he was party to.
Yeah you can just export entire chats through the web api, shouldnt be difficult.
Good. Do it.
If it's not classified information then it's reportable. It was sent to a reporter it needs to be reported.