this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
211 points (98.6% liked)

politics

25197 readers
3283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

American president angles for top diplomatic award while world watches his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 93 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Dude is going to surrender Ukraine and claim to be a peacemaker, while sweetening the deal with a chunk of Alaska.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 37 points 11 hours ago

America for sale. Everything must go.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 24 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

a perfect place for Putin to build a road and put tanks so that Putin and Trump can divide up Canada.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I don't want it this way, since both Trump and Putin are total goobers, but it would be cool to have a rail and road bridge across the Bering Strait someday.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Strait_crossing

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

If the three major world powers (America, China, and Russia) ever sort out their authoritarian governments, it'd be neat to take a train across the world to Beijing.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

They put trains on boats in Italy

Might be simpler to take it across the Atlantic

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago

Can you at least give Canada a heads up when you start making it even easier for Trump and Putin to get our country from all sides at once? Thanks.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

No, it wouldn't. It would be a vector for Russia to attack America.

The single biggest advantage that the US has had is the built in moats called The Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

Putin is not a goober. Putin is an ex-KGB officer.

Putin shadowed Reagan in Reagan's visit..

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago

Did you not read their first sentence?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

100%. Russia likes to control the countries on their borders, to act as a buffer against invasion. Better to defend you country on someone else's soil, and destroy their assets. We use the oceans for the exact same thing.

That is, until he deliberately made enemies of those on our direct borders. Next he will want to control those countries, because he will feel it is very important to controlling the borders.

And all these ideas are coming from Putin. After their meeting, expect HitlerPig to start spouting all sorts of nonsensical concepts that would be terrible for us, but great for Putin.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Share a border crossing with Russia? No thanks.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Why are no leaders playing him like a fiddle on this?

Ensure Russia ends the war with the same or less land than it started with and he's a dead cert

Reality doesn't matter to him so just string him along

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 7 hours ago

My prediction is that Putin will offer him Alaska in exchange for Canada, and Trump will grab it, without considering that Alaska isn't his to give away, nor is Canada Putin's.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

And demand an award for how much better he is that anyone else at it.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 76 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I just can't imagine being so immune to shame that I call to nominate myself for the Nobel Peace prize. Especially if I had raped children and it was widely known.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's like Trump isn't psychologically human, he's completely unrelatable.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He's a sociopath - just like the rest of billionaires. Having that much wealth, no matter how you got it, and keeping it, is already an act of great violence against many. But these people employ special psychologists and therapists to "get rid of" what's left of their conscience. They're essentially training themselves (and their children) to be psychopaths from a very young age. Even the ones who were actually born with something of a morality compass will have gotten rid of it by the time they need to step into the family company's hierarchy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

I often call the Sociopathic Oligarchs, but I'm finding that more and more of them have graduated to being Psychopathic Oligarchs, including the Traitor-in-Chief.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 7 hours ago

His psychotic parents deliberately never instilled any sense of shame, guilt, consequences, empathy, etc. in him. He is a remarkably broken human, an actual psychological specimen. He should be locked up, and studied by scientists. Very few people have had an upbringing that was literally tailored to create a psychopath.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago

He is mentally a four year old who has never progressed beyond the me, me, stage.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No no it was John Barron who called, not Trump.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

That's the one where he holds his nose and talks

[–] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago

Well Obama (not bad guy, but had not really done anything Nobel price worthy) and Kissinger (really bad guy who had no commitment for peace, guite opposite should it be opportune for his view of US foreign policy) got the price also. Soooo from that point of view it isn't too crazy from Trump's view to desire one.

Of course takes guite shamelessness to propose oneself of course, but yeah. Wouldn't be even close to first time someone not deserving got Nobel peace price. Which is sad, since on the other hand very deserving people over the years have gotten it. Giving it to non deserving people diminishes the recognition it gives to the deserving ones.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 42 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 7 hours ago

Smell the desperation.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 41 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

What a weird, desperate loser.

[–] miss_demeanour@piefed.ca 14 points 10 hours ago

Releasing the military upon his own people rubber stamps the award for him.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

It eats at him that Obama got one. He can't stand it.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Just another reason the conspiracy theory about Obama giving himself the prize is bullshit. Too many people would have to keep a secret with no incentive to do so.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 11 points 11 hours ago

"lol, no." Jens Stoltenberg, probably.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

“Yes, this is President . . ehh John Barron, . . yeah, that’s the ticket! And I’ve got a great candidate for you, for your fabulous bigly Famous Prize in Nobel . . . “

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

Given how the last decade has gone, I expect he will be given a Nobel prize.

He just magically gifts everything he wants. I hate it.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

See if we can dig up Kissinger to present it to him.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 hours ago

This has to be an Onion piece. Surely...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago

And can I also be considered? I say many things on Lemmy! Is that something that can contribute? Alright, how much? $200? You want $200? Man I only got $5.50. Is that okay? I'll get you back later man! C'mon! C'mon man! Peace price!

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The fact, that someone else as Trump even considered this, makes me ashamed to be human.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I thought he didn't care about the NPP

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 2 points 10 hours ago

Another zany episode in the Horror Annals of the monster Donvict Trumpepstein.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol -3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Well the fact the drone bomber in chief won one makes Trump's question far more reasonable. There are clearly zero standards.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Obama met with lots of Middle Eastern leaders and signed many new agreements such as the JCPOA.

Drones were a pretty new capability and have only increased over time, in fact in the previous Trump term they removed the need for executive approval before drone strikes.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I'd have gone with Kissinger personally