this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
117 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

73972 readers
3304 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 205 points 3 days ago (4 children)

$2.99, then $4.99, then $6.99, then $9.99, then $9.99 with commercials and $14.99 without.

Howdy ho!

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 59 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Lol. Wanted to comment exactly that. Netflix drove me to piracy again after I went legit after 25yrs of piracy. Won't fall for this streaming-bullshit again. Go fuck yourself. And Netflix was even more worse for everyone outside the US. For the same price of course.

Nah, piracy never been easier: enter name of movie/series, wait a minute, watch. On all devices, rooted or not, mainstream or not.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I actually probably spend more on hardware and labour pirating content than I would on multiple streaming services, but at least I don't pad the profits of enshittified platforms, and can watch what I want when I want.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ha, I was doing a similar calculation recently. I think the only subscription I ever paid for was Netflix, and for the others I used family and friends' accounts. Only replacing Netflix, I haven't broken even, but considering I pirate content from 5-6 different services, it's absolutely cheaper.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah sure, for the price of my servers i could probably get all streaming-services together for some years :-) But they're not just for that. Jellyfin is just one of the services that runs on them. But yes, even if not. Better paying 5x for something like that than netflix et al.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Me too. They actually made stop being lazy and make a full automated server specifically for this. Netflix was awful too with the buffering.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a vastly superior experience.

I don't have to deal with annoying authentication, no ads, works on everything, all content is available in a single app/user interface.

Cheap. I split the $40/mo seedbox charge with 3 siblings, we all save on streaming.

I even have audiobookshelf because I like listening to audiobooks.

No music yet, I don't have a good (private tracker) source

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look into Usenet. Much better experience than torrents.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've used Usenet, I can see how it would be good for music. Being able to grab individual tracks on demand would be nice.

What's the software stack used now? Manual downloading nzbs from index sites? or is there an *arr equivalent?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lidarr is the one for music

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, I didn't know Lidarr supported Usenet. Hmm, thanks I'll look into it

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I learned my lesson with Netflix, I'll never stop doing things the better way again.

I still will never forgive Netflix for pulling a show without warning when I was actively watching it. A problem I never get doing it my way.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And then $24.99/mo and no commercial free option ever. Plus they send you spam advertising and sell all your personal data. Cha-ching!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What I find funny about this is that often the quality of the shit on the service decreases as the price continues to rise.

To see the end state, just check out trying to stream all of the NFL games of an out of market team. It's like $1000 a year to watch mostly beer and truck ads broken up by thirty minutes of "football".

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

This is my default mindset now. Anytime I see a relevant "new subscription with great value!", I just...don't. Because I already know it won't last, it'll get sold or bought out, and everything good about it stripped out and scrapped.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

$2.99 for now

ad free for now

This is step 1 of enshittification, offer a product thats cheaper and higher quality than your competition. Once they have a userbase they'll start tiering their service.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Gamepass anyone? 🤣🤣

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

def tryna get ppl to go well its cheaper than a debrid service

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago

The same Roku that added mandatory ads to their home screen after selling the product and promising not to do exactly that?

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Roku Channel is also ad-free with PiHole.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not the $3/month ad free Tubi type service that is the bad part. It is the part where it is attached to Roku. That company has proven the kind of trash they are already.

Roku via telstra bricked by Telstra TV box that I was using to watch mp4 channels on an older set.

Never trusting that brand again.

TPB FTW.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

not that I'm going to use this service, considering roku's sleazy history of thrusting ads into anything they build, but looking at the content: eh, lots of solid b material..... but half of it has $ next to the title.

what the fuck is the point of showing you THE CATALOG if half the shit requires more money? I despise this on Amazon as well. If it's not on the service i'm already subscribed to why the fuck are you cluttering up the UI?

sure, if people want that, let them turn it on, but by default? scumfucks.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 6 points 2 days ago

When I saw the ad for this on my Roku I thought it was just some western channel based on the name and color scheme. It wasn't until I saw an article about it that I even knew what it was. I looked into it, my thoughts are, terrible branding, terrible marketing, terrible discovery on the website.

I don't see anything that I don't already own that I would want to watch, but since the website search sucks I don't know if there's more to see or not.

Based on all that, I'm not even willing to blow $2.99 one time to see if it gets better in the app because I doubt it will.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Your point? 🤔

i had no idea roku bought frndly

Jellyfin/Plex with the *Arr stack is still the better option. A little bit of setup, but then blissful ad-free self-hosted streaming.