this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
255 points (94.4% liked)

pics

21626 readers
950 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Fuck people who buy those big beasts, then can’t handle them for shit, and try to park as close to the front door as possible, fucki ng up parking for every other vehicle. Never even trying to park straight…ungh.

Edit: to be fair, i used to own an oversized pick up. Similar but a much much earlier style/model. At the time i regularly traveled forestry roads like, 40 kns into the back country, so i actually needed it. Got rid of it when it was clear i was not going to be going into the field anymore. These do NOT belong in a city.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Every trip in a truck with an empty bed is a waste. Tooling around with stuff in the bed without the intent to deliver/use it at your destination is even worse.

Yet that describes 99.99999% of all pickup truck use in America. Just a huge ass waste of gas and space in parking lots.

Trucks are expensive too! If I were a scam artist I would definitely be targeting people driving shiny pickup trucks with empty beds. Because they definitely aren't practical or realistic people.

Wait: Maybe that's how MAGA started? 🤔

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's how you know it's all for show. People casually forget you can rent trucks for 20 dollars a day too. "Oh well I'm glad I have it for towing and moving". Bull. How often do you tow really? And even then I'd expect it to sit at home most of the time. Moving? Once a year. Rent a truck. I go to home Depot and rent theirs when I need it.

Buying a truck like that shows you are way too worried about what people think of you, you have to feel "big", which usually means you're a small man, and probably bad with money.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People casually forget you can rent trucks for 20 dollars a day too.

Rented a big truck for my move. It was a bitch to drive, cost me 75bucks for 2 hrs (it has the 29.99 in-town advertising plastered on the side) and didn't fit more shit than a rental van of the same price.

Honestly vans are so much better to move with. Can move so much more, and don't have to worry about the rain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I just looked up the dimensions of that thing and it has 10cm (3inch) shorter bed than mine. How you even manage to pull that off with a truck that big is beyond me.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

These brodozers aren't used for anything useful. I like having 4' between the wheelwells and a box long enough to get a full toolbox across the front of the box and still get a 1000L fertilizer tote in it. And low enough that I can climb in the box without a ladder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 61 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Unpopular opinion: unless you regularly haul things, you don't need a truck of any size. Unless you regularly go off-road or are transporting 5+ people and a dog or more, you don't need an SUV. You can rent one of those for the rare times you need it! And in the meantime, you'll save gas money and pedestrian deaths will go down...

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I will somewhat disagree with the SUV comment, as my escape counts as an SUV, and I regularly fill it far past a sedan's capacity when I go grocery shopping (the savings from driving 3+hours each way to the nearest Costco far outstrips the cost in gas) and when I go camping.

And, as I camp in a tent, and have kayaks I can strap to the roof, I don't need a truck at all, because my car can get me to every campsite that a truck can get to, often easier than someone dragging a camper can.

Plus, since its a plug-in hybrid, and Canada doesn't burn fossil fuels for power, my fuel efficiency is significantly better than the average sedan in drives under 100km, and breaks even above that.

On a 60km drive, I average 2L/100km, a 100km drive I average 4.6L/100km, and on a 300km drive I average 6.6L/100km (100km/h), 7.5L/100km (110km/h), or 8.8L/100km (120km/h), which is well within what sedans average.

[–] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (9 children)

All absolutely valid points and my only counter argument here is that is why wagon sedans exist. Growing up in Poland a wagon was the family hauler bringing all the stuff you mentioned to pretty much anywhere you need. People even haul rvs with the wagons and you’re still smaller and relatively more pedestrian friendly. Hell they even make performance cars in wagon spec like the bmw m3. Not saying that to discredit your point just that there was another option before the suv craze came about

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Fun fact: Only 1.4% of the cars sold in the US are wagons and of them 72% were Subaru Outbacks.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I've owned two of them!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 day ago

...wagons nearly don't exist anymore in the US market, but i concur: hatchbacks, wagons, and minivans are purpose-designed vehicles for the way people use them in the real world, whereas modern trucks and SUVs are overwhelmingly poseur props for families in denial of their suburban utility lifestyle...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish Canada didn't burn fossil fuels for power but as an Albertan I can promise you that we do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you haul anything pickup trucks are laughably bad to do so.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 11 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Modern pickups are bad. Old pickups were fantastic for "I need to pile a bunch of (insert thing here) in the back."

But now every pickup is a massive motor for a tiny truckbed that my ford focus wagon has better hauling capacity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

trailer for hauling and then own whatever you want for driving, a subaru impreza will handle the offroad most people think you need a truck for. If you haul often a van shits on a truck in terms of cargo space, practicality, protection of cargo, ease of loading and carry a trailer while you load or unload. Modern american trucks are just crossovers with a tiny, useless flatbed bought to appear country. Trucks are only for the edge case of construction workers and maintenance crews who have to actually go off road (as in area in the forest where there is no road, not a gravel path a ferrari can drive on without issues). And for serious offroad that requires you to actually carry more than a single chainsaw: unimog.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I cant actually tell what you drive, it's hidden behind that douchemobile in front.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

I 'enhanced' and it seems to be a Nissan, aka 'pickup-mobile' for the chicks....

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago

Nissan Navara King Cab D40. In the US these are called Frontier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

I remember a time when that Frontier was considered a big truck, especially compared to Rangers and Tacomas.

Now the Rangers and Tacomas are almost as big as the Dodge in this...

ETA: Just noticed you're in Europe. Sorry that 'murican fattism has reached you, I didn't know these compensators existed across the pond.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nice. I'm planning to get a compact pickup soon. The prices are starting to get really steep where I live. It's like $4000+ for a 25 year old truck with 180,000 miles on it.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

we have reached a time when the normal size vehicle is called a compact

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everything has gone the way of the fast-food soft drink size.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's so stupid, if you actually need a small truck your options are to buy used basically.

We just need a couple small (easy to navigate in cities, good on gas) 4wd trucks on the market. You're basically stuck in Ford Transitsright now, which they've just stopped making, or buying 20yr old Mazdas and Rangers. Or being forced into the same F150s every other fleet operator has. I know the market for these vehicles exists (though demand is low) why does no manufacturer try to fill it?

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actually small trucks stopped being made in the early 2000s. Mid size, which has also been growing for several years, is the smallest kind that got made after the EPA regulations changed.

People like to blame truck owners for their bigass vehicles, but I think they're only half responsible, with the other half being that actually small trucks just don't really exist anymore.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My grandfather drove around a beat up Datsun pickup, smaller than most sedans these days. But it did the job for what he used it for, and ran forever. I think I've seen less than five on the road in the decades since. They seem out of place in today's SUV/huge truck world.

I think 70s-80s small pickups are going to become collectables in the future.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's like $4000+ for a 25 year old truck with 180,000 miles on it.

And even worse if you're picky about features, like a manual transmission or four wheel drive.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Those were the requirements I had on top of a black color.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry about your massive penis.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Nothing to apologize for

[–] superkret@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Put a Ford Focus behind it to show what people actually need.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Frontiers are awesome little (relatively) work trucks. I don't ever need to haul people so I ripped out the rear seats and installed shelving for anything I need to keep secure and dry. Big enough bed to throw nasty/oily parts. And a good enough towing capacity for most rental equipment like bobcats and lifts. Basically a half van.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is actually a Navara, which is the European equivalent of the Frontier. As far as I know, it's otherwise the same vehicle, but Frontiers usually come with a 6-cylinder petrol engine, whereas this one has a 4-cylinder turbo diesel. Mine originally only had two seats to begin with, since I preferred the longer bed instead. Ironically, the bed on this monstrosity didn’t seem any bigger than the one on mine.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago

Yeah, they're pretty close to the same truck. I would have loved the diesel option, but we're deathly afraid of small displacement diesels in the US.

[–] BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Frontier is exactly as much truck as most truck owners actually need. I love it. I wish it was more fuel efficient but it's a mild, modest, effective vehicle and i have not yet run into a situation it couldn't deal with. Wonderful purchase. It turns like a boat but that's a decent trade off to avoid the Toyota Tax on the Tacoma.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I did the same when a coworker showed up with an F350 crew cab 6.5ft bed. Lifted, offroad lights, cb antenna, diesel (which is the HD option in the US). He lives in the suburbs and pays laborers for everything. So I plopped my dutiful little Mazda B2300 next to it (Ranger) that regularly hauls a little bit of wood.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guaranteed he bitches about gas/diesel prices too.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He didn't buy it for MPGs, he bought it to complain about $/gals

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So I plopped my dutiful little Mazda B2300 next to it (Ranger) that regularly hauls a little bit of wood.

'96 Ranger 2.3L here. My truck has the same engine as the Ford Pinto and that's the way I likes it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] udon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

In the future, cars will be so big that we will need a second, smaller car to drive us to the driver's seat.

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For anyone interested: there's a new community for small trucks !keitrucks@lemm.ee

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ford Ranger 2004 vs 2024 is like Mario before and after mushroom.

load more comments
view more: next ›