this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
242 points (98.0% liked)

politics

25133 readers
2072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Democrats have relocated the fight to Illinois and New York, building a public case that this redistricting crisis isn’t a local quirk but a dawning national crisis. At stake, they’re arguing, is whether the rules can be rewritten state by state to manufacture Republican majorities in Washington. So far, national Democrats are taking the crisis seriously, but it’s unclear how they will respond. Will we descend into a tit-for-tat redistricting war between red states and blue states with high-profile partisans like Donald Trump and Gavin Newsom as their proxies? Or will we move toward a system buttressed by pro-democracy interventions like independent redistricting boards? The outcome depends greatly on how organizations, labor unions, and regular people organize at this moment.

The labor movement seems to recognize both the opportunity and the responsibility inherent in the current crisis. State AFL-CIO bodies from Texas to California to New York released a joint statement calling the Republican coup what it is: a coordinated attempt to disempower working people. Other labor unions have rightly joined in, claiming the redistricting fight as a working-class fight. Grassroots groups, meanwhile, have begun to stage protests outside of the Texas State Capitol in support of the Democratic walkout.

If the quorum break fizzles and becomes memory instead of momentum, Republicans will only be emboldened to escalate their strategy, and our country will race closer to full-on authoritarianism. But if students, workers, tenants, and local organizers join in to name redistricting as their fight too, that will keep the pressure on. Right now, this issue is strictly an electoral standoff. We need to bring it down to the ground level, generalizing the popular understanding that our democratic rights and working-class power are at stake.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250808121059/https://jacobin.com/2025/08/texas-democrats-walkout-gerrymandering-redistricting

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 51 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Opening move? The coup has already happened. The fix is in. This is an occupation. Opening move? We're at the fucking starting line still they mean.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 21 points 19 hours ago

The 2024 takeover plan is complete and Project 2025 is well underway, but I'd argue these are the first concrete actions within the plan to cancel the 2026 midterm elections and 2028 general.

[–] BullishUtensil@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The Democrats first moves, yes.

That the Republicans already made a bunch of moves...

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

The real first moves the Democrats did was to move their pawns out of the path of their king, basically letting Republicans move to "checkmate" without a fight.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

To be clear: for now, the entire concept of fair redistricting needs to be categorically disregarded.

The Tribunal of Six has decided that playing overtly political gerrymandering fucky-fuck games is a-okay. Until and unless the practice of gerrymandering is declared wholly illegal, it MUST (and I mean the RFC-2119 definition of “MUST”) be used as a standard tactic by the Democratic Party at a national level.

They’ve refused to level the playing field for fucking decades, and that’s a big part of how we got here. Anything less is frankly gross negligence - or, an admission that they are wholly subordinate to the Republican party.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If there's one thing that'll get gerrymandering outlawed, it's Democrats doing it at scale. I support it

And that is the entire point of the strategy that I’m describing. If it’s “allowed”, then just fucking do it. If everyone agrees it’s illegal, then nobody can do it.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

Would've been nice if they fucking acted like this in 2010 when republicans did it the first time and actually started the coup. God I hate it here.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

Its never been a better time to move to a better system of voting... ranked choice, or even better options...

Need to get rid of this stupid system that had empowered terrible people for decades just because otherwise it wouldn't be fair that one side would always win.

Fuck this convoluted system...

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm wary of the hype over this gambit because it's been tried several times in the recent past and has always ended with a few key legislators caving and returning to the capitol for no real concessions. Hopefully they realize that people are not in the mood for token resistance (and Abbott's threats against them will steel their spines).

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Or will we move toward a system buttressed by pro-democracy interventions like independent redistricting boards?

HAAAA HAHAHA
Oh man, that's a funny joke.
I want this person's drugs.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It happened here in Michigan a few years ago. It took a ballot initiative, but it’s made a positive difference - it broke the Republican gerrymandered grip on the legislature

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, ballot initiatives are literally not a thing in Texas. The change would have to come from either the Texas legislature itself or a sweeping law at the national level. Good fucking luck with either of those solutions.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago

Oof, that sucks. Ballot initiatives have been huge for progressive victories. It’s how Michigan legalized cannabis and put abortion rights in the state constitution. It’s a shame they aren’t everywhere.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Interesting move for the Democrats. Where was the will to take direct action like this six months ago when it would have mattered?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

These are local Democrats, not federal ones

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago

So like... Two different groups of people.

These ones actually acted when the moment came, they have no control over what happens in Washington

We should be praising them. They did their damn jobs, and we should wildly gesture to them when the fuckers in Washington whine about not having the numbers to do anything

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I mean, where was the willpower of voters/nonvoters 9 months ago when it mattered?