this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
361 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

17510 readers
1103 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qupada@fedia.io 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Surveillance-minded" (hereafter, "Helicopter") parents were almost certainly already doing that.

It just required a sharp knife and a tube of contact adhesive previously.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

Some shoes even already had compartments in them and came with a toy car that fit in there

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I was under the impression this is the main selling point of AirTags. Is there a real market for tracking lost luggage? I see AirTags being sold in every Kid’s store around here.

I have one in a very well hidden pocket in my backpack. Because it’s my gig bag, and goes with me when I’m working in the field. If I were just leaving it under my desk all day, I wouldn’t bother. But since it often ends up sitting in the corner of a random room while I run around a building, it has an AirTag buried in it.

[–] Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dog has one on her collar. She got lost once, after chasing a squirrel, so it was a no brainer. The cool thing is that you can make it go off, by pressing a button, and train the dog to come to you when it chirps. I hope I never need to use it in an emergency, but it's good to know I'm prepared.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This reminds me of an episode of Black Mirror that I can't remember the name of.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes! You’re the best!

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I'm not concerned with tracking where my kids are with these, but tracking their shoes sounds kinda useful. Average daily conversation in my house:

"Where are you shoes?"
"I don't know?"
"You were just in the middle of putting them on!?!!"
"Yeah but... I can't find them now."
"How? You had them in your hands?!?"
"That was, um, before I got distracted."
"*sigh* Let's go try and find them."
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A lot of people don't know this, but you can put your weed in there.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ah yes the old "hide your weed in the back of your PS2/under your Gamecube" method.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

I would rather not

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just give them a phone. Then at least they get something they want with it, instead of ugly shoes.

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Young children should absolutely not have a phone, unless I suppose it's completely locked down to chat apps and the tracking I suppose...

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

My little sister has a phone I set up for her. It has no internet browser, requires permission to download apps, no voicemail, blocks unknown callers, and turns off at 9pm with the exception of contacting family or emergency services.

Phones can be safe for kids if parent just put in the time to learn about parental safety systems and implement them.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

More and more governments issue warning about the effects of screens on baby, toddler, and child brain development. The age the Netherlands puts forward now is 14 to have a smartphone, and no screens or very limited until 3 years of age.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Kids have a distinct advantage in this ongoing consumer tech war between parents and kids.

I don't use TikTok, but I'd be pretty surprised if this wasn't already starting to trend there, along with ideas for where to put the airtags to fool parents.

Maybe just... talk to your kids?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

be kid

find this in your shoe

get idea

catch seagull

tie airtag to its foot.

go see mom having a fit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Can"? Were they physically unable to before?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It is likely more that they are designed to have AirTags with special compartments.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The peak of evolved kids shoes are those with wheels on the heels ("Heelys")

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oplkill@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For mine kid(if I would have them) I would tell them to have those tracks, but only with a deal to not use it against kid. Like kid skipped a school and I will can't use that track info as a proof to punish kid. So, only use it as a real safety of kid, not as spying it

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I used to voluntarily share my location with my dad for "safety". He ended up texting me his McDonald's orders anytime I was within proximity of a McDonald's.

Nope.

[–] oplkill@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The latter is used to justify the former.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Parents worry about their kids. All mammals I've ever heard of do this. So when you tell human parents that they can have a better chance of finding their kids if their kids are missing, injured, or abducted, that's going to appeal.

I don't believe it's about sUrVeIlLaNcE at all.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Maybe good in a country that has barily any walking or cycling infrastructure, where every idiot has a gun and where all the biggest serial killers originate from. And where recently your kid can be kidnapped by unmarked unrecognizable fake police and sent to a concentration camp in El Salvador without any legal process.

But when you live in a first world country, your 8 year old should be able to go to school by bike on his own without issues what so ever, would never be kidnapped and would be brought home by a concerned neighbor when he falls and get injured. And would never get lost. You don't need an air tag for that. I've even seen kids go to school on their own in Cambodia without issues. They have over 40 different deadly snakes including 6 types of cobras.

When you treat a kid as an irresponsible criminal and/or idiot, that's what they will become.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When the kids find the “hidden” compartments immediately and swap their tags around.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

Parent: "Why does Billy keep going to his friend's house in the other county?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

showing my age but when I was a kid during the summer or on weekends I'd be out of the house all day and just where ever in my town. My parents didn't care as long as I was either home for dinner or by the time the street lights came on. and if I wasn't home for dinner I had to find a phone and call not because my parents would be worried but so they either wouldn't have to cook as much or set out a plate for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Seems like an ok idea until you realise you could just give them a key chain, or put it in the small pocket in their trouser if you think they'll lose it. That way you don't have to buy into a whole ecosystem of shoes with a slot that fits an airtag.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Depends on the age. For a 3-5 year old prone to sneaking out on adventures it could be useful.

Just one problem: Mine tended to attempt their escape barefoot.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Put a tag on their ear, I know some biologists that can hook you up

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My friend who has a non-white son is considering something like this just in case an ICE kidnapping happens.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

A bit of a cynical take, but it wouldn't surprise me if ICE started throwing away shoes and phones onto the roadside.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

It's only a matter of time before they start building piles of children's shoes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Wait. Parents now put airtags in kids their weed compartment?

load more comments
view more: next ›