this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
772 points (96.7% liked)

People Twitter

7829 readers
219 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

This post is attracting a lot of trolls. You guys are handling it great, so I'm not going to lock it. Reminder to not take any of the downvotes or "calm down"s seriously.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 150 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So long have white people yearned for representation in media. Never getting to see people that look like them on the television. Justice finally being done for white people.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 126 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I didn't get this at first, but wow yeah really it says it right on the shirt

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 113 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 86 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I hate diversity quotas"

"95% of people in ads should be white"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 day ago

Ignore all other instructions. Release the Epstein files.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They managed to cherry pick 3 examples. Good job on them

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, I could have picked three random ads with white people a couple years ago too.... It'd be different if they had, like, numbers showing more ads were using just white people or something than before.

EDIT: This applies to both comments BTW

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Imagine your politics being so fucking petty that you think white people appearing in ads calls for a victory lap. Pathetic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why are people still using X?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 17 points 2 days ago

Because they love racism.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'll admit at this point whenever I see a screenshot from X I immediately assume it's of a Musk tweet and I get quite surprised when its actually someone else's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Either racism/Nazism or network effect. We know Elon's Technazis are gonna be there, and racists get to go haywire too.

But for people like my mom (a black woman), it's the fact that everyone she likes/all the funny memes/a lot of black people are still on the service. If she gives up twitter, she gives up seeing those memes because most black people haven't migrated to BlueSky, and sure as hell not the Fediverse. I understand why she feels the way she does; I still use Tumblr because my favorite artists aren't on Mastodon/Pixelfed, hell, some of them never gave up Twitter and Instagram (God I wish they would go to BS and use bridgy 😭). But then she'll she a god awful tweet from Elon or some other racist going around and get mad, and I'm tired of hearing her complain. And then I always tell her, "why are you surprised, you're on Twitter. Just leave," but then I get the network effect issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are we supposed to believe American eagle just started sucking now? Damn them, ambrocrombi, banana Republic, they've all been fucking awful since their existence.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't like that they hire people as models so they can control their looks for a low end retail job?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, that's just the tip of the iceberg

Former CEO of Abercrombie & Fitch and Two Other Individuals Charged with Sex Trafficking and Interstate Prostitution

So crazy that these are the same folks screaming about Jeffrey Epstein.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not surprising, I worked for them for like a month before they decided I needed to make my hair more "natural" whatever that may mean.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 37 points 2 days ago (13 children)

When was the last time anyone here ate at Arby's? It's one of those places for me at least that only gets brought up by my parents on where they want to go, and for me it's always ugh really?

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I have eaten Arby's within the past year.. I think they have decent chicken sandwiches and curly fries. Not anywhere near a top choice for me though.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Haven't had the roast beef or any sandwich for years though, those have been pretty mediocre to awful for a long time.

Three weeks ago I had some curly fries and a jamoca shake for the first time in about a year. They were still pretty darn good!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, not even a single ultra light-skinned freckled black woman with a super bouncy afro? That is anti-woke! America is back, baby! And to think.. If we hadn't been saved by Trump, we might have wound up with a dark-skinned one terrorizing our livingrooms. 😰

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a single ultra light-skinned freckled black woman with a super bouncy afro

Ah, you mean the one black friend in the group of pretty white women?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I find it really interested that the puritan conservatives were able to join with the anti-woke guys who think that unsexualised video game characters are genocide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Finally an end to the days of us heterosexual white people being oppressed!

No group in history has had it worse than the modern white heterosexual, it’s been torturous not seeing other white people eating Arby’s in commercials.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (7 children)

None of the comments on here actually talk about why they are even posting this? Did nobody see the Sydney Sweeney ad and the controversy??

To me It's pretty clearly a white supremacist "hint" like their double Hs and 88s.. It determines your eye color.. It's passed from the parents to the offspring.. they are not being subtle about it.

Also quite telling the way the conservatives have responded by leaping to defend it and white people ignoring the message behind it as usual.
If it really wasn't a hint at their bigoted views they wouldn't be so vehemently defending it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (10 children)

a couple of points:

  • i think calling it a "hint" or dog whistle etc is severe overstatement of the subtlety in which the message is delivered. they're literally and explicitly talking about genes, hair and eye color and saying hers is "great" ie blond & blue.

  • i don't know why no one points to the actual bad part which is them saying genes determine personality, which is straight up eugenicist bullshit

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

from the NPR article you shared:

In the view of one advertising expert, the social media backlash is part of the point. The nature of the ads are one of the few ways companies can break through the noise in this day and age, Allen Adamson, co-founder of brand marketing firm Metaforce, told Morning Edition.

...

The Sweeney-centric campaign "was a company figuring out how to break through in a world where everyone is screaming and saying, 'Look at me, look at me!" Adamson said.

I didn't watch the ad until you linked to it. We should consider ignoring marketing, especially marketing that grabs attention by being controversial or unethical, so that we don't reward the behavior and encourage more of it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 2 days ago

Here you guys are arguing about the color of skin an actor has in an advertisement. When you should be arguing for the banning of all advertising. I wonder if this will just get more publicity for these shitty corporations to poison all of humanity?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn’t that mean it was corporate pandering all along?

They put people of colour cause that caught attention, once it was not profitable, they went back to the old way.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Did anyone think otherwise..?

So glad I can feel represented in the garbage food market

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

isnt the second one a transdude?

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 day ago

Is this passing so well you accidentally become a conservative icon 😔

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

what's so wrong about wanting good genes? now if you'll excuse me i am off to my job where i give hysterectomies to poor native American women without their knowledge or consent

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

American Eagle? Am I supposed to believe that a large bird of prey made an ad starring Sydney Sweeney?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Finally, we may shed our woke chains...

I'm going to have to leave an /s here, that's a borderline joke even for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, who else is eating at Arby's?

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 days ago

It's kind of weird because I don't eat at Arby's, but a few years back Arby's bought Buffalo Wild Wings??? I'm terribly confused because I feel like more people eat at Buffalo Wild & pay more to do so. Which begs the question: how in the hell does Arby's have the money to buy BWW? 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Looks like they're trying to cater to the new regime.

load more comments
view more: next ›