this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
51 points (89.2% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1203 readers
584 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won" Math doesn’t lie—people do. A buried NSA‑authorized audit paved the way for this unelected illegitimate regime. This Will Hold Jul 31

There is a previous series on this substack that predates todays article.

https://open.substack.com/pub/thiswillhold/p/ex-cia-whistleblower-the-nsa-audited?r=1qlx1p


Originally Posted By u/lillithwylde61 At 2025-07-31 12:02:12 PM | Source


top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

I would love if this was true and could be proven, because it would at least restore faith in the voting populace. Also it would cause such a massive uproar it could lead to some heavy violence.

However, there are a few things in this post that are just hidden behind technical jargon and aren't necessarily what the narrative is claiming. I've been following ETA and SMART, so I'm well aware of the intricacies of the discrepancy. My biggest thing is: how did all of the individual spot checks match up perfectly? When they did hand counts to verify why didn't those flag? That would mean either many many election organizers were in on it (terrifying) or there are other ways to explain the weirdness with everything.

Also, why is this guy only coming out now? Until I see a smoking gun, I'm holding judgement. Like I said, I hope they all get caught if they actually pulled this off, but that's a HUGE claim and needs irrefutable evidence.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk about the whole US, but I do know about North Carolina as I was an observer at a polling place during that election. I spoke to the wonderful person running the polling place. North Carolina has paper ballots that go through machines. After the election they take a random sample of those ballots and check for major variances. They then check AGAIN a few weeks later. If either turns up major differences they do an automatic full recount. I'd imagine most states have something similar.

While I don't want our current political situation, we have it. These types of articles offer little proof. But what they do is undermine the voting system even more. For them to have rigged the NC election, there would have had to been a massive conspiracy campaign. Someone would have seen somethig and come forward.

Again I WISH this were true. But until there's actuy evidence, and not some random substack article, we let these assholes do what they do and we stand up at election time and do better.

I've been actively contacting my representatives. They of course don't answer, like when I asked them for a comment on a member of their party openly quoting Josef Goebels, or they spin the question. I expected as much, but I'm doing what I can.

Currently it's either going to get worse or better. I wish it will get better, but I'm more confident it's going to get far worse first.

Thank you! I have only seen this mentioned in Reddit posts and Substack articles, and definitely feels like an op to undermine trust in the voting system. Targeting an audience that wasn't wrapped up in the 2020 campaign to undermine the voting system.. eyerolls all the way down. The people in place are like electors, delegates, and state secretaries, where the power is de-registering people, throwing out whole locations of ballots, refusing to certify counted results, and many other ways to make voting painful. But not necessarily messing with individual ballots, except where they have armies of people to review any questionable ballots but those are reviewed by reps from both parties in that scenario, I think? Mostly remember the Nevada episode of Veep on that last point

[–] Brocon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And nothing will happen. As always. As much as I respect that mans wish to get a bullet to the head, I don't think that even if this is true, that any Republicunts would step down and accept the outcome. Especially a narcissist like TACO.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The supreme court cooked these books in 2000. Gore won then, but since he conceded and pushed for the wrong Florida recount, the 5-4 GOP supreme court ruled that Bush was the lawful president.

Now the supreme court is 6-3 GOP, with most of the same conservatives, and Harris conceded much larger margins than Gore, it literally wont change anything.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

Hey, uh, you might want to stop using substack links considering they openly promote nazi shit now and are a nazi bar, and have been for a while.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

This is the third or fourth time I've seen accusations of this. Last time everyone was asking why Kamela didn't say shit after losing. If this was true what could be done about it. None of the stories about this ever go any where.