this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
482 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24855 readers
3127 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (7 children)

as a european I might just not understand the nuance of this but WHAT IN THE FUCK?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The 2025 Medical Ethics Defense Act allows physicians to deny care to patients whose lifestyles they disagree with

“It’s absolutely not ‘pro-life’ — and not very Christian either,” said Rep. Gloria Johnson (D-Knoxville), as she shared the woman’s story after the town hall. “And who else are they not going to treat? I had a friend say: what about someone who’s addicted to drugs or alcohol, or who’s struggling with mental health? If you can just refuse treatment to anyone whose lifestyle you disagree with — that’s not medical ethics. That’s fascism.”

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sounds like an attack on medical ethics to me, how is that a defense?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago

Its just like any other super henious piece of legislation that removes human rights. They give it some sweet helpful sounding name (eg. Patriot Act) so when anyone votes against it they can point fingers and say "THIS COMMUNIST HATES PATRIOTS!" or (eg. Kids Online Safety Act) "THIS EVIL BASTARD DOESNT WANT TO PROTECT KIDS!!!"

Its a fascist habit as old as time itself.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It's called doublespeak and is used in virtually every piece of legislation that might grab headlines.

Doesn't matter what the bill is actually about. Just call it the "Save puppies and kittens act", and it becomes political poison to vote against it because most people don't read past the title. And if you do try to vote against it, your political opponents use it to say that you hate puppies and kittens.

Sadly, it is very, very effective.

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It's because the individual is more important than the community. I suppose you can call it the Harold Shipman clause of medical ethics.

You see, according to US doctrine, you are the only person that matters. Therefore, if you let other people die for fun, it's okay. They're part of the community, not you, the individual.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that’s not medical ethics. That’s fascism.

"Yeah, that was kinda what we were aiming for in case you weren't paying attention. What's your point?"

-- GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they'll care about the fetus when charges can be brought against the woman for neglect.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Oh, they'll bring charges against the woman for neglect. But they'll never, ever care about the fetus.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

Yikes

Patient Registration Questionnaire Question 856. Patient's preferred computer operating system (OS): Ubuntu LTS

"Yeah, sorry buddy, we don't serve your kind in these offices."

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A bunch of American men believe women should not have sex outside of marriage (except with them of course, where women are expected to be nymphomaniac whores).

Basically completely unrealistic and unreasonable shitty people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 23 points 2 days ago

You understand it, it's fucking insane so your reaction is normal.

I actually prefer you don't understand. We're an ass backwards society and we're not your allies anymore.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

No nuance. Women are property to them

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Well America has always been the home of the free. Its in their national anthem and a huge part of their cultural identity.

For example, you're free to perform your own bodily functions such a procreation in any way you wish, provided that you're participating in a state sanctioned marriage, and that you belong to a demographic which is desirable to the state, and that your DNA does not contain any markers for undesirable traits, and that you express continued loyalty to the supreme leader eternal.

Its such an enlightened way of life.

[–] DBT@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

As an American, I also say WHAT IN THE FUCK to this.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hate how religious people are given permission to discriminate. Someone else's religion has nothing to do with me. I shouldn't be constrained by a religion that isn't mine and if someone can't provide care based on their religion, then they have no business being in the profession. None at all.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironically, they are going directly against the teachings of the book they claim to love and study daily. The New Testament is full of warnings to treat others as you would be treated, love your neighbor, accept others as they are, abandon worldly concerns and improve yourself before judging others, etc etc. I'm just a bitter atheist pointing out the ridiculous state of their "faith"

[–] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

As they say: No hate like Christian 'love.'

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"My religion says I don't have to stop for red lights".

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sorry, your religion isn't old enough for absurd exceptions to laws.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ah, see, my religion infinite years old, but has only recently been revealed to me and me alone. It's actually all the other religions that are too young in comparison. Much like the children the church is throwing under the bus to protect career pedophiles.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I’m sure there’s a biblical interpretation in the big three that could lead to this conclusion.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not being married doesn't make her less pregnant. What the hell do these people think they're doing for a living -- are they gonna take care of potential babies, or are they there to preach?

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's about propagating the religion- the lives of the people are unimportant. The religion grows by enforcing a set of customs, and anyone who doesn't comply is threatened with ostracism or violence

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they helped her medically, she could live and thrive while not conforming to their rules. They are afraid of other women under their thumb realizing the grass is greener and also pursuing such a nonconforming lifestyle. They know deep inside that their beliefs only are preserved through coercion

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I meant the ostracism or violence part. It was meant to be tongue in cheek…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She wasn't even "promiscuous". That absolutely shouldn't Legally matter and doesn't morally matter at all, but the physician wasn't even going for low hanging fruit: she had been with the same man for 15 years and they had a 13yo together?? They were essentially married. Stfu dumb ass physician.

I hope it goes all the way to the Supreme Court (not that she should have to) and I like to think if I ever met said physician I would suddenly recieve divine intervention that, morally, no doctors should have Achilles tendons.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She was not the property of a man. That's the standard by which these people assess women

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

My gods i wish you were wrong

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can bet a significant amount of money the mother is black and they are simply being racist pieces of shit.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She said she does have experience navigating the world of healthcare and Medicaid and explains she feels privileged in this way — a way most others wouldn’t be, especially being a white woman and employed.

Nope she’s a white woman. I mean I agree that I would have wagered she wasn’t white and hence the treatment. But fuck these religious bigots. I’m so sick of people not even following the teachings of the religion they so desperately use to define their lives.

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Well, jokes on you I'm already broke!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How and when did Tennessee become worse than Texas and Florida? That’s the home of genuine living saint Dolly Parton, isn’t it? Every time I think I can’t become more disgusted by the U.S. I see a story like this. The ongoing gleeful predation and harm of vulnerable people, both domestic and foreign, is beyond the pale. Peaceful options have failed, and all that is left is descent to unimaginable levels of suffering and depravity and, eventually, violence. And all this at a time where the planet is literally dying and we should be doing everything in our power as a species to claw it back. It’s hard not to feel hopeless.

We’ve been considering moving back to B.C. but the way things are going I think that would only buy us a little time. This problem with fascism, capitalism, and general inhumanity is a global problem and there is no escape.

Sorry folks, I usually try to be more hopeful and solution-oriented, but this hit hard today.

Race to the bottom. Every week I hear another reason why Texas, or Tennessee, or Florida, or Oklahoma, or Missouri are the worst fucking state in existence. I feel like they're all trying to one-up each other right now and couldn't give two shits about their citizens.

[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Picket that doctor's house. Make an example of them and make sure it ends badly (bad from the doctor's pov). Career ending as best case scenario.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

Apparently the whole practice.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Tennesseestan

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Whoever designed this website should be tried at The Hague.

collapsed inline media

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

uBlock got rid of all that for me

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not Google Amp. Voyager for Lemmy.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m sorry I ever besmirched your good name.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just a Lemmy client with a webview setting to quickly open pages in app.

Been running an Amp blocker made by Apollo’s dev for over 4 years. Fuck Google’s amp wrappers.

We need a freedom "from" religion amendment to the constitution.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She really should do a crowdfunding and get the heck out of there. Tennessee is trying to kill her and her child.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›