this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
797 points (99.4% liked)

News

31120 readers
4038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 243 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

ABC is greatly, greatly softening the severity of what the Prosecution is alleged to have done.

It is much, much worse than just 'Prosecution accidentally violated his HIPAA rights'.

https://www.courthousenews.com/luigi-mangione-accuses-prosecutors-of-fudging-subpoena-for-his-health-records/

“The district attorney falsely made up a court date — May 23, 2025 — and drafted a fraudulent subpoena that if Aetna did not provide documents on that date, it would be in contempt of court,” Mangione claims in a New York Supreme document, filed Thursday.

(In legalese, 'Mangione claims' means that his lawyers claim this in an exhaustive report/complaint to the judge of this case.)

The Prosecution appears to have served Aetna with a literally fake, fradulent subpoena.

That subpoena included a court date which was never actually scheduled in the court system.

...

You cannot do this.

Any request for a subpoena like this has to go through and be approved by the judge.

Circumventing the judge and essentially falsely acting on a fraudulent representation of their authority is actually potentially a crime, bare minimum, something a lawyer can be disbarred for.

And this is the District Attorney of New York leading the legal team against Mangione, whom Mangione's Defense Counsel has now formally accused of doing this.

Mangione's counsel has requested to the Judge that, bare minimum, whoever on the Prosecution team is actually responsible for this be removed from the rest of the proceedings, ideally, have the entire trial be dismissed as a mistrial.

...

Here is the entire complaint to the Judge from Mangione's Defense Counsel:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/mangione-hippa-defense-filing.pdf

...

This could actually blow up at least this New York State level case against Mangione.

...

There are currently two simultaneous cases going on, one at the New York State level, one at the Federal level, all of this is irt the NY case.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Holy shit, this should be huge news being seen everywhere! Instead, the bought media will distract us with more circus sideshows.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

I was first alerted to it by Status Coup news on youtube... but uh, most lemmy news comms only allow, you know, written articles.

Hey maybe courthousenews counts as a legit, written source?

Post it everywhere if you want to, not like I own the idea of linking to them, rofl!

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

The news will literally never talk about any of this. We don’t have freedom of the press in glorious republik of amerika

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Are they trying to get a mistrial in order to avoid the fallout of a potential "not guilty" verdict as well as the potential fallout of a "guilty" verdict?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

collapsed inline media

I mean, I guess that isn't impossible, but I really have no idea.

My guess would be that they are just assuming they can get away with whatever bullshit they do, because fuck Luigi, hail corporate?

I do not know.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They are really putting their best effort for minimizing this whole ordeal so tbh I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Holy fuck. That's insane if true.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't work as an attorney or anything, but I have some exposure to the inner workings at times. Screw ups are absurdly common. In this case, after the prosecution deleted the documents, the defense sent them a copy from thier side. Just absurd levels of incompetence all the time. So don't rule that out.

Next... in general, for some absolutely absurd reason, it usually isn't illegal for the government to lie. Like on the subpoena. The police are allowed to lie to you during interrogation. ICE has routinely (and not just recently) signed thier own subpoenas and presented them as legal, even though without a judge's signature they aren't legally binding. Odds are that what they did is standard practice, no matter how vile it is. And the signer probably wasn't even a lawyer, just some legal aid.

What's different in this case, is they have a witness saying the prosecution verbally said that what they were doing was wrong, and did it anyway. Not sure if that will matter if it turns out to be standard practice.

In short, the legal system is a farce. TV would have you believe technicalities matter. But they only matter if they support what the judge wants to do anyway.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

for some absolutely absurd reason, it usually isn't illegal for the government to lie. Like on the subpoena.

Wait, seriously? They can outright lie, not like “our investigation leads us to believe that you X and are charged with Y” like an arraignment?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I mean... these examples I'm seeing are ... while real, and extremely troubling...

These are all relating to cops.

Lawyers are not cops.

They do not play by the same legal rules, so to speak, and uh... this isn't a case where the complainant or defendant... is a cop.

So ... I mean, I am not a lawyer, but I don't think this ... works in the way you seem to think it does?

Like uh, police can do a bunch of shady shit, they can lie to you, they can bullshit their way into searching you or deciding some extreme circumstance allows them to do some bullshit...

But a subpoena is a not a thing cops do. They do not issue or execute subpoenas.

They execute warrants.

Warrants are not subpoenas.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, I envy your hopefulness.
https://www.boston.com/news/national-news/2025/07/15/immigration-agents-demand-tenant-information-from-landlords-stirring-questions-and-confusion/ ICE officers (cops essentially) signed the subpoenas. It's not technically a lie. I can write and sign something I call a subpoena too. So all the prosecution had to do was have someone other than the lawyers sign it, just to help ensure they can't be disbarred for it. While not a lie, I would call it an abuse of power and position for sure. So no, the "fake" subpoena just isn't the smoking gun you think it is. The only real question is what did they say that the witness heard. None of the news stories I read were very specific about that. And I think the witness worked for the insurance company, which is getting sued for handing over the information. So the witness likely will be pressured not to talk as it could incriminate them and thier employer. And I bet they will be represented by lawyers from the company, as they likely couldn't afford as good of a legal team.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I mean, yes, I agree with you that the entire state of essentially the entire legal system is up in the air, dubious at this point given recent Supreme Court rulings and Executive Orders...

But if we are to pretend/assume that... the law actually exists as is written, that precedent and the way that proceedings generally play out over the history of US law is not all now completely arbitrary...

Then the Prosecution has to actually file their subpoena to, in this case, Aetna, with the actual Judge/Clerk in the case, so that the Judge, the Court, and the Defense Counsel actually know what is going on with the case.

To subvert this process is to subvert the right of a defendant to a fair trial.

Your example regarding ICE essentially self-authorizing themself is widely, widely derided by all manner of lawyers and legal figures across the country as being a dubious violation of this kind, which functionally means they are violating the law every single time they do that.

Yes, I get that the on the ground reality and the legal framework are not at all the same thing in this era of modern facism, but that is because the facists just brazenly and repeatedly violate the law in their own supposed execution of the law.

If you can find me an example of a prosecuting counsel flagrantly fabricating the notion that they have filed a subpoena with the judge/clerk of the court, and this being allowed and the case proceeding without consequence for this behavior, I will be more inclined to believe that this will also be allowed in this Luigi case, but I will remain convinced that such would still represent an egregious miscarriage of justice in the sense of destroying the defendant's right to a fair trial.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s also kind of different (in a legal not moral sense) to have police lie to an individual vs a lawyer lie to a company to steal medical record and violate hippa

Depends on the motivation. In both of these cases it allows the gov to put people in jail easier. So while different, they are probably the same from the probability perspective.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And to what end? What does his health insurance have that is evidence of the murder? Did he make a stop at the hospital right after or something, and make a claim to Aetna?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

Exactly.

In the letter, Luigi's defense also notes that fucking none of that would be relevant to the case anyway.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Place your bets about how AI was involved now!

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 99 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's not forget that Mangione looks nothing like the guy in the original mugshot.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 15 points 3 days ago

There's a nonzero chance the CEO was a client of Epstein and the same goes for members in the board.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those eyebrows… I’d recognize them anywhere

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

~~That smile~~, Those caterpillars, ~~that~~ those damned ~~smile~~ caterpillars...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 76 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

However, prosecutors said they requested limited information from Aetna and Aetna sent them additional materials in error. Prosecutors said they deleted the materials as soon as they became aware of them and brought it to the attention of both the defense and the court.

The error was compounded by defense counsel resending to prosecutors the very same items prosecutors had already deleted, a source familiar with the subpoena said.

When prosecutors can't take any responsibility for their own stupidity, implicating others is always their go-to.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey. With this level of incompetence he could walk free.

This is where i see additional problems. Govt or no, Aetna should have been way more diligent in addressing any requests for info, and in providing more than what was explicitly requested they are also committing a HIPAA violation. Any counsel for Aetna should have been well aware of the risk of sending health records out and been very, very specific on what was to be sent and not to avoid a compliance issue.

If i was on Mangione's legal team I'd be preparing a civil case and HIPAA violation claim against Aetna in addition to seeking removal of the prosecutors involved. (I'm not a lawyer but worked in health insurance for several years managing patient data.)

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Mangione's lawyers are going to grind the DA office into burger at trial. Fucking morons.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

In that case all we have to hope for is a fair trial.

And that the judge isn't compromised at some point, either by ideology, financial obligation or fear.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There's many parts of the dictionary that could be replaced with a pic of him. But I think the US justice system is ironically solidfying "martyr" as the top pick.

At this rate, they're striving for Joan of Arc levels of history.

I hope he knows everyone is truly grateful of the impact he has made and is continuing to make.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 52 points 3 days ago

...34 count felon awaiting sentencing is president, alleged shooter in jail...justice?....

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is this not an instant mistrial?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they've never even tried to bother to pretend this is going to be a fair trial.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 7 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Which tells me that they have no evidence whatsoever and he is innocent.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

He's actually innocent. But they need a scapegoat to make the rich class feel safe.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"The District Attorney has subpoenaed Mr Mangione's health insurer

Would that be UnitedHealthCare by any chance?

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, whichever it is, I don't expect them to have Luigi's best interest at heart. Not that they ever have anybody's best interest at heart beside their shareholders' anyway...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mcange@feddit.org 29 points 3 days ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m no lawyer. Here’s a question. Would the federal case a jury trial?

I’m trying to figure out if there’s an advantage to futzing the state case. Corporate America wants this man’s blood.

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not United Statesian and it feels like they change the rules every time I blink, but I think a trial with a death sentence as a possible outcome does require a jury. And if I am wrong, some vulgar good samaritan of the Internet will swoop in to politely call me a pig fucker.

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Am unitedstatesian (one word, uncapitalized), not legaeseian.

Constitution does state though, defendants have the right to a trial by a jury of their peers. Sixth Amendment

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_of_one%27s_peers

Criminal trial for sure falls in this category. Regardless of if death penalty is on the table.

load more comments
view more: next ›