this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
381 points (99.5% liked)

News

30965 readers
2711 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 105 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

He using a personal email for that? Because I work for the state and I know ALL of my emails are subject to FOIA so I keep them clean of personal shit

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 59 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

From the same crowd who still chants "buttery males"

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

(Hint: say it aloud)

It’s the whole “but her emails” crowd about how Hillary using her personal email server is the proof she’s in league with Satan - but then this (or Signal-gate, etc) happens and they conveniently ignore it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I don't even work for the government, and my personal rule is "never put anything in writing that I wouldn't be able to explain to a judge."

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

For real, anything sent from a company email is owned by the company. Not that a company usually has time to go through such shit but they can if they need/want to. It's usually very easy to do and can be done without the worker ever knowing.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

The only safe communication is with your lawyer. Second would be your spouse, just don't get a divorce.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago

Elon's Boca Chica launch facility is a nightmare of violating all kinds of environmental and safety regulations, going way beyond the scope of what it was originally permitted and cleared for.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-BavKuMDed0&list=PL-eVf9RWeoWEfSK9mjKe4E67IK1-1vZxB&index=24

This is from 3+ years ago now, and most of the shit brought up here got poo-poo'd online by ravenous Musk sycophants, and seems to have just led to nothing actually happening in terms of some kind of a lawsuit or punishment for Musk or SpaceX...

... and of course, its all only gotten worse with more time.

SpaceX launches showering debris over the Caribbean, latest rocket being prepped to be the next IFT launch just fucking detonated while being fueled, damaged much of the rest of the complex... and the complex itself is now a bunch of very densely packed storage tanks, which easily could have also all blown up if that most recent on pad explosion played out just a bit differently, or maybe a landing capture/catch attempt goes wrong.

Musk's whole... reason for having the chopsticks catch system is that he doesn't want to spring for a larger launch facility with things safely spaced out, he doesn't wanna pay for something akin to the giant NASA crawler vehicle that moves rockets something like a mile or so from the VAB to the actual launch/fueling site at Cape Canaveral.

There's no actual compelling reason for the lower stage, Booster, to not just have landing legs, like the Falcons. Its not going to get 'refurb, refly' times to even within two orders of magnitude of what he's shooting for. The fastest ever turn around time on a Falcon is like, 3ish weeks... and he's talking about launching multiple Starship+Boosters in a single day now.

To date, no Starship nor Booster has ever been re-used without suffering a catastrophic loss on that re-use. He is no where near a re-usable fleet of these things.

Err, well, there is actually a real reason for the chopsticks, and all the rest of his nonsense: His engines aren't as powerful or reliable or fuel efficient as he said they were for years.

But he can't actually directly say that or else SpaceX probably goes bankrupt or at best gets pared down to just running Falcons.

He recently revised Starship+Booster down to only being capable of 50 tons to LEO, not the long touted 100 tons.

He then proceeded to have ... 2, 3? Catastrophic failures on 'test' launches where the claim is that they're being done for the 'data', when the obvious fact is that no almost no useful data of any kind is being gained from all this.

Whats going on is quality control sucks, Musk/SpaceX have no idea how to actually properly assemble these things, oh right and the design is fundamentally flawed, but its fine, because Starship 2 and 3 are gonna come out... some time later.

You know, like how Roadster v2 is gonna come out any day now, for the past decade, how all Tesla cars will suddenly become perfectly fully autonomous, any day now, for the last decade.

From the article:

Kevin Bagnall, a lawyer representing Musk’s rocket company SpaceX, also wrote a letter to Paxton’s office arguing the emails should be kept secret. He cited one main reason: They contain “commercial information whose disclosure would cause SpaceX substantial competitive harm.”

Most of the rest of Bagnall’s letter, which further explained SpaceX’s argument, was redacted.

Musk and representatives for his companies did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

imo, Abbot and Musk are and have been colluding to maunever around SpaceX's frequent and flagrant violations, to get investigations stalled, to get authorizations rubber stamped... so they communicate outside official channels to pull this off.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I have a separate cell phone for city business, so I don't have ANY cross-contamination between personal and city data.

And it's been handy in Open Records requests where reporters have asked for my phone and text logs. With the personal and city info being separate, I don't have to worry about needing the state AG to authorize reductions.

I black out sensitive data (there's a list of what kinds of data should be redacted without an AG opinion), and I hand it over.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I also work for the state, and occasionally have to remind myself that anything I email could be read in court in an anti-sarcastic deadpan tone.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, frankly, if you use your government email to share results of your colonoscopy and the details of your infidelity, that's on you. You don't get to hide your publically accessible documents behind those things just because you can't compartmentalize your personal life.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 63 points 13 hours ago

"intimate” information that isn’t of “legitimate concern to the public.”

You know - things like charges, payment methods, offshore bank accounts, preferred vacation destinations, scheduling private jet flights...

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 58 points 13 hours ago

He argued they include private exchanges with lawyers, details about policy-making decisions and information that would reveal how the state entices companies to invest here. Releasing them to the public, he wrote, “would have a chilling effect on the frank and open discussion necessary for the decision-making process.”

Holy shit, that's definitely an argument in favor of making it public.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 55 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck, they think our money is theirs and they work for no one but themselves.

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Brought to you by "we kneel before kings" Texans.

Turns.oit all hardcore bravado was nothing but cultist bullshit for the GOP

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Hey! Don't mess with Texas!

We'll cry if you do.

Every time Ted Cruz flees the state, a supply-side angel gets its wings.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I was planning on a good afternoon of crying anyway.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You can cry on my shoulder. It's hot here and I could use the free water.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Isnt Ken Paxton's wife divorcing him, on "biblical grounds", as she puts it? Maybe Abbott, Musk, and Paxton are a throuple....

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Every time I see that emoji all I see is someone deep throating an orc

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Why, oh why, did you put that into my head?

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

gotta grow the community! 🌱

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Looks like meat's back on the menu boys!

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 3 points 11 hours ago

So the emails between him and Musk are just dick pics? Fascinating

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 hours ago

Dude! How gullible are the people of The Texas Newsroom that they'd give Greg Abbott money in advance knowing that the final arbiter of the question is Ken "not in jail for a long time on fraud charges because the prosecutor was his employee and worried about getting fired" fucking Paxton??

Not saying that they had it coming or anything, but DAMN! Those dudes are untrustworthy by REPUBLICAN standards!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 19 points 11 hours ago

It's probably just forty-five emails from Abbott with him telling Musk he wants to be his tampon and Elon sending a poop emoji back each time.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Greg Abbott refuses to stand for the national anthem. I also hear he is a little piss baby too.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

A disability joke that attacks Abbott from the right. Stay classy, friend.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The fact any of these bozos use digital comms (email, whatever) for anything sensitive is mind-boggling.

Maybe it's cause I'm a "digital native" (sort of?) or whatever they call it. Old enough to have a childhood without widespread internet, but young enough to learn it easily. Do these dudes just not have the internal switch that realizes "email is forever"???

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

they know full well what the rules are, they believe they are not beholden to them

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago

Abbott is a spineless cunt!

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, it cannot be requested under the Freedom of Information Act? Can't that be escalated to a lawsuit?

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"Yeah, but like... Could you not?"

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I'll leave it alone if you cancel my student loan debt.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Grifter gonna grift.