this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
452 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24717 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 149 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is exactly one person's life that Trump cares about, and that says everything that needs to be said about this topic.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am absolutely positive that this is a direct result of Elon Musk's little bitch-fit earlier. He tried playing a card he didn't hold in his hands. He assumed he did, and then when his bitch-fit didn't get him anywhere the administration quietly decided to torch any and all evidence and just pretend it never happened. He played a card that Trump didn't want him to play, and so they took it straight out of his deck in the most blatant-to-anyone-with-two-brain-cells manner possible.

I thought, before this, that there was a slim possibility -- however slim -- that Trump merely associated with a child rapist, and Elon was simply pulling a(n admittedly half decent) plausible "gotcha" out of his ass. Now I know with certainty that Trump is a child rapist.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

With the testimony against Trump from people who claim he raped them when they were children... Let's just say that if Trump was a Catholic priest, they'd have already moved him to a different country.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 92 points 1 day ago

Pedophiles lives. Pedophiles lives will be destroyed. Or people happy to associate and socialize with pedophiles.

Truth told? I'm not gonna lose a wink of sleep over their lives being destroyed.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

GOP: "Pedophile lives matter".
Republican voters: "We love pedophiles now!"

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How come this logic doesn’t hold water for people who live in poor neighborhoods or areas with gang activity? Or for migrant workers from Mexico?

Clues you in to who they consider “people” and who they consider wage slaves that exist for their benefit

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 44 points 1 day ago

So, you can destroy normal peoples lives, people who've paid taxes and followed the law, but rich pedos are above the law, got it. America, you're cooked.

[–] runiq@feddit.org 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

"[Trump] said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct. They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another," O'Reilly began. "If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. The media doesn't care about context — so you can't do that. You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be."

Oh, yeah, Bill, you're totally right. Lemme just put down this pitchfork and torch and go right along with NAW I'M JUST KIDDIN EAT THE RICH

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

You can't destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.

- Donald "Russia, if you're listening" fucking Trump

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

Technically, that’s true. A fair bit of investigation would help, but friend Patel isn’t in much of a hurry, now is he? And this was never an issue before either, when it was - say - the Clintons’ heads that were gonna roll, why is that then?

load more comments (2 replies)

Isn’t that the point? To destroy the lives of pedophiles?

Trump Doesn't Want to Release Epstein Files Because (rich) People's Lives Will Be ~~'Destroyed,'~~ inconvenienced with having to spend money on lawyers when a few of their wives divorce them Ex-Fox Host Says

Real “Brock Turner-ism” happening here. Be sad that some rich people might get in trouble.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 34 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, that’s the point. They’re child molesters.

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s probably every fucking billionaire. Aaaannndddd once it gets released nothing will happen.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bingo. Nothing well come of it anyway. People well still support Trump even if he's in the list. I'm convinced nothing Trump could do would hurt him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 30 points 22 hours ago

If you rape kids your life should be destroyed though

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 28 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

The lives that mattered (the victims') have already been destroyed. Why are we protecting these people?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

conservatives went from "would somebody please think of the children" to "would somebody please think of the pedophiles"

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

They all know this lands Trump... or someone important to him in some deep shit.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

They only care about fetuses, not so much once they're out.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Because they are Trump’s campaign donors. And him.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know whose lives I'm concerned about? The children whom these monsters raped. Does anyone care that their lives were destroyed?

If you choose to rape children, don't complain that your life is "destroyed" just because you have to face consequences. You did this to yourself and deserve every consequence you receive.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have any of the victims ever come forward?

That’s an odd piece of this puzzle - where did those children end up? Dead? Threatened into silence (like the girl who had a lawsuit against Trump that was dropped around his first election?)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL, he must be talking about himself, since he never gives a rat's ass if someone else's life is destroyed - see for example, the outcomes of DOGE, ICE....

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump could rape a underage girl on camera and nobody would care.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

He almost certainly has.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago

Fucking GOOD! Let them be destroyed! These are the sorts of people that NEED their lives to be destroyed!

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Unlike their victims who’s lives do nothing but thrive

/s

[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm ok with that tho. There are no Innocents on that list.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

He's trying to retcon the whole thing (and no doubt pad himself and his cronies), by fabricating this fiction that there are names in it that are just associated with Epstein, without being involved in anything illegal.

Personally I don't buy it. Seems like he's in CYA-mode.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gameline@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago

waaait, but apaaarently they said those files "did not exist" 🤔

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Two possibilities:

  1. The Epstein files are full of Magastanis.

  2. There was never anything in the Epstein files and the Magastanis lied and 70 million idiots believed them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just happy that they say "ex-Fox Host" because it implies that people don't know who Bill O'Relliy is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, I really feel for those poor innocent millionaires who associated with a known pedo totally in good faith.

load more comments (2 replies)

As they absofuckinglutely should.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

The only person trump means when he says “people” is himself lol

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

What about the lives already destroyed?

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, he's in there for sure. Probably several times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Old_Bald_Bloke@feddit.uk 10 points 4 hours ago

Really wish that somebody would leak these papers

[–] notsure@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

...so one set of lives can be destroyed because they have no purchase on society, the other cannot because it does?...so rape and abuse is allowed for the wealthily endowed?...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Good guy Trump looking out for the poor, helpless rapists.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

People? You mean his whole shit stain Administration? Those people…?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Uh, huh? And?

We are talking about the sex offender / pedophiles that Epstein theoretically had dirt on, right?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

These are demons that we are calling human, the politicians and businessmen that are ruining our society and causing misery simply because it is their nature to do so.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

First and foremost his.

Yes.... the child rapists' lives would be destroyed.... that is the general idea.... and you are opposed to that? Are you soft on crime? The crime in this case being child rape? Or are you just, specifically, pro-child rape?

load more comments
view more: next ›