this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
488 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22040 readers
3624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon revealed that MAGA operatives are "working on" securing Donald Trump a third presidential term in 2028, despite constitutional term limits.

In an interview with Chris Cuomo, Bannon said, "We'll see what the definition of term limit is," suggesting they're exploring ways to circumvent the 22nd Amendment.

Recently released from prison after serving four months for contempt of Congress, Bannon placed second in a CPAC straw poll for 2028 GOP nominees behind JD Vance, while maintaining tensions with Trump adviser Elon Musk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bannon placed second in a CPAC strawpoll

My first thought: That'd be great, there's no way he'd win

My second thought: Democrats would find a way.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My first thought: That’d be great, there’s no way he’d win

Remember, the overwhelming majority of the country thought the exact same thing about Trump in 2016.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

as parent intimated: Democrats will find a way. :-(

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats, the masters of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

i mean let's give Putin some credit too, his disinformation campaigns and bot farms have been a master class in manipulating public perception. that's to say nothing of the Twitter/X situation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Read: They still don't have a replacement for Trump.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course they do, but the issue is that too much of Trump's control over their base is from his cult of personality (somehow), not the plan itself. They don't know how to replace that. Yet.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Musk is hoping to be next. Yes, constitution doesn't allow it, but they don't intend to follow it anyway.

[–] bradv@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 day ago

The constitution also doesn't allow an insurrectionist to be president, but here we are.

[–] MrGG@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's why they're so interested in making Canada part of the US. His mom is Canadian. If Canada becomes part of the US he becomes a natural born US citizen and becomes eligible to run for president. And this is one of many reasons we cannot allow ourselves to become part of the US.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They absolutely do not need Canada for this.

We are living in a post-truth world. The MAGA right do not care about the law, the facts, or even what is right.

They want power. By any means necessary.

FOX and OAN will run pieces about how Musk was born here in the states and was moved to South Africa to help run his emerald mines. They will draw up fake birth certificates, change birth records in hospitals to show he was born on an Army Base in Texas.

They'll even find the doctor that ushered his delivery.

And the Right will eat it up.

The sad thing is Trump has the means to make all of this possible. This is not figurative.

This is the nightmare scenario. And Musk will not let go of power.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're putting a LOT of faith in those arteries holding up that long LMFAO

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just keep feeding him McDonald's lol

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 9 points 1 day ago

I swear to God you can hear all the grease caked inside his body when he speaks. That wheezing, wandering, droning voice has had a few too many Big Macs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (10 children)

We’ll see what the definition of term limit is

It's right there in the amendment:

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

Donald Trump was elected twice. He is ineligible to be elected again.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. The constitution also says anyone who starts a fucking insurrection is also ineligible and yet here we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If I had to put money on it, I'd guess they contest the legitimacy of the next election, and he just refuses to step down - can only be elected twice, but he's just there as a care taker until a proper election can happen

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, reading the language again, I can absolutely see some shenanigans where he runs as VP for someone else who runs on a platform of "vote for me and I'll immediately resign and put Trump in charge again". It'd need the supreme court to decide if that "and" is exclusive or not, and given that half the court seems pretty happy to give up their principles of it suits their politics, I wouldn't be surprised if that worked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

It says "elected", but what is the president isn't elected? They will find a way, and with recent reality bending Supreme Court decisions or won't even be so hard.

Ok ok, but hear me out - what if we didn't have elections. No problem!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago

Since we can't rely on the law, it'll need to be the people's veto.

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 26 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

If Presidents can run for a third term, I want to watch Trump get destroyed by Obama, when he also runs for a third term.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

You don't think they're covering that contingency?

They rules they have formulated and want to pass as law are that the first two terms must not be consecutive. This would preclude Obama from having a third term.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago

Just like Biden used the SCOTUS immunity ruling to legally assassinate trump?

Democrats will not ever break precedent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Likely scenario:

They'll first try to get two thirds of both the senate and the congress, and to a constitution overhaul in the style of Hungary. If that fails, there's always the option for a martial-law, or just circumventing the whole of the constitution.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

To be honest, the most likely scenario in my mind is some form of war declaration or emergency, suspending elections has precedent during wartime.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

A very handy use of the expansionalist dreams of GOP, but more likely is that Trump will just use the war on immigrants as an excuse to suspend elections.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there precedence for that in the US? I can't find an example of US elections being suspended during war time, even the 1964 election happened during a war period.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe make him speaker of the house then have a stand in prez and vp step down?

I know a vp has to have presidential eligibility to be elected, which Trump wouldn't have at the end of this term. But Im not aware of the same restriction on the speaker

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

That's the wording. It looks pretty iron clad, if you care at all about the rule of law.

[–] GoatTnder@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that word "elected." It doesn't specifically exclude someone assuming the role of president through the line of succession.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

No, but the "acted as" should technically cover it. Again it's meaningless if laws no longer apply lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

That wording wouldn't prevent Trump from becoming Speaker of the House, and then becoming President for a third term through the line of succession.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Nope, that is a declaration of war

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Time to 2A up to protect yourselves America. Only a copper jacketed hollow point between freedom and tyranny.

FYI I know nothing about ammo other than what I hear in movies or TV.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Hey yo, while we're cutting jobs I heard the secret service costs the government billions and isn't even secret, we best tell Musk on X and use a thinky emoji to show how smart that observation is.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Trump will be 79 in 2 months, at 83 he himself wont be around to run in 2028, but MAGA would still be there and that's what we should be fighting. I mean sadly and similarly Bernie Sanders wouldnt be around to run in 2028, but his movement is what we should be carrying

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago

A strategically deployed hamberder in the next 1000 days will ensure Trump is president for life.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

He wants to be just like putin. He should be in jail!

[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 11 points 14 hours ago

Time to really get to know our communities and our people in the military. The only justice imaginable coming from this is a coup in one form or another to oust them. Anyone in the military that is actually on board with this needs to be purged by the rank and file.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Third term?
Again with the Russian model - why not be more imaginative and declare yourself some new made-up dictator name (& just be a dictator, no terms, no red & blue, only polished golden ass), like something Borat would come up with.

His supreme big handedness of the Lord, the shitter of golden diarrhea, he who licks no domestic butts, the holy eternal MAGAer, the trumpest with the mostest absolute dumptruck ass, senior car salesmen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

Anyone surprised at this is unqualified for political office.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago

Maga operatives? Does he mean Gavin Newsom?

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Fascist pricks are doing something fascistic, what?!

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is nothing to work on, unless you think 3/4rds of state legislatures will agree to amend the constitution so that Trump can have a third term. Not gonna happen. The only way they could attempt this would be to violate the constitution.

The only way they could attempt this would be to violate the constitution.

I don't think they're gonna be too worried by that.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

The more people say it's impossible, the less.they consider the options that, though wayyy out there, are how they have found ways to do what they've already done.

There may not be a single obvious loophole, but a cascade of loops -a Möbius loophole -is how they approach things.

Do not forget his remarks recently about the big mid term surprise and blue states : "they may disappear off the map completely"

Not sure how you feel about that, but even in trump's verbal diarrhoea, that seems a terrifyingly ominous statement.

load more comments
view more: next ›