this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
266 points (96.5% liked)

politics

24601 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 124 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 41 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Alas "express purpose" is in there. Clearly the express purpose for petrol companies is profit. And CO2, other pollutants are just inadvertent things that happened on the way to (destroying the planet for) profit. I mean they only sold the petrol products, they didn't force people that purchased the gasoline to burn it. Maybe we can go after the combustion engine producers?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

So one could say they hobby at creating potassium iodide, but its expensive to pay to dispose of, so I dump it out of the back of an aircraft that was hired. There was no intention of actually seeding the clouds and making it rain, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 hours ago

All pollution?!? Make all pollution illegal?!?!?

That’s what it is, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 93 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What an absolute fucking idiot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 63 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

So would preventing “geoengineering” also prevent trying to stop climate change?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 10 hours ago

She only knows that word because someone told her today

She's a bloody idiot

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly can't tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

I mean, I assume it's chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a "I like the smell of forest fires, and you'll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body." Given the source.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 46 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If this unintentionally regulates greenhouse gas emissions I’m going to laugh so hard.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

It would be beautiful if this dimwit bumbled her way into making the world a better place....but we're probably in the wrong timeline for that

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is performative ignorance, to please the home schooled bible toting cretins who vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 32 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Misting fans are now a felony

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 9 points 8 hours ago

AC units blackmarket about to blow up

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is awesome. Do it. What’s gonna happen when the contrails don’t disappear? Who are they gonna arrest? Gonna have to stock up on popcorn because the theatre of the ignorant is about to get really interesting. Finally a piece of legislation I can get excited about.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

This is a bill to arrest people trying to prevent climate change.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

All the fucking stupidest people. Every goddamn idiotic conspiracy theory is getting a pipeline straight to mainstream news outlets and a rep in government now. Instead of some stupid Bircher literature or having to stand out on the street and screech nonsense at passerby who could just ignore the crazy people...

I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

We already have the anti-vaxxer dumbfucks, the Qanon loons, the evolution-denying dipshits, what else is missing...? How about David Icke level bullshit about lizard people?

JFC.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So go after the bullshit corpos releasing megatons of co2 into the atmosphere

[–] Oyml77@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago

That's not for the express purpose of altering the weather. That's just a lucky happenstance for ol' Marge.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

So, she wants to ban "cloud seeding"?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

If I could control the weather, this woman would never not be getting targeted by lightning. She'd have to run serpentine whenever she was outside to dodge all the lightning bolts aimed at her.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 14 points 9 hours ago

Calm down Zeus. You're getting another unhealthy attraction to a mortal woman.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Laughs in Final Fantasy X

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

She's attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]

[–] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Green is such a waste of resources.

Ugly, dumb and vile.

And I bet she stinks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

Why is mtg still able to talk?

[–] GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

@RememberTheApollo_

OMG I think this is an opening for an absolutely different kind of green new deal. Wait till she finds out how the weather is being modified (can somebody tell her that Elon Musk’s data center is running the numbers and doing it?)

And I’m going to have to ask now that the Republicans are in charge of everything with the next big disaster occurs. What is she gonna do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

These aren't serious people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

I mean, technically we’ve been playing around with cloud seeding and such which is about the only thing I can think of that would even come close to what she is talking about. But it’s by no means a common occurrence.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 1 hour ago

I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

anything but the real issue

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

wow that's quite a twist, USA is going green! Right?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Thats what I'm understanding. Finally someone willing to take on the Fossil Fuel Industry

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pawnfuture@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

These people are dumb as rocks. There are also similar elements in GA like Kandiss Taylor(stupid name) beginning their political careers also proclaiming that Climate Change is fake but also suggesting that unprecedented weather conditions must be the work of external forces presumably also blaming the jews.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 6 points 9 hours ago

Wonder if this could be used against fossil fuel or chemical companies. The only words that would need to be dropped is "express purpose"

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why the fuck did we thaw her?

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 7 hours ago

Nobody wanted that. She thawed naturally with global temperatures rise.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Could MTG accidentally tackle climate change ? that would be amazing

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, this bill would actually do the opposite. While expert opinion seems to vary on the subject of geoengineering and its attendant risks, it might become a necessary tool for tackling climate change. The standard theory is that we could disperse aresolized materials at high altitudes that would increase atmospheric albedo (reflectivity) to reduce the amount of sunlight absorbed by the atmosphere. This wouldn't be permanent, but it could buy us time as we work on decarbonizing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Seriously fuck this idiot and the idiots who voted for her. Just a disgraceful embarrassment. Then again so is work, so I get it, but have some dignity.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

It's because MAGA is spreading conspiracies that geoengineering is to blame for the Texas flood.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

I will fuckin love if she fucks around and discovers climate change

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They are coming after your 'chemtrails'. What a whacky weirdo bunch. Nothing better to do than chase imaginary windmills. MTG really needs counseling, perhaps meds, as she appears to be living in a made up world with little to no relationship to the actual world we all live in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›