this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
145 points (95.6% liked)

News

30768 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allah@infosec.pub 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For the first time in over six decades, the CIA has essentially admitted that one of its psychological warfare officers, George Joannides, was involved in an operation that had direct contact with Lee Harvey Oswald in the months leading up to President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Why it matters: This quiet revelation, tucked inside a recent release of 40 documents about Joannides, contradicts years of CIA denials about his role in the Kennedy affair — both before and after the assassination. Experts now say it's clear the agency misled investigators for decades.

The smoking gun: A CIA memo dated January 17, 1963, shows that Joannides was ordered to use an alias, "Howard Gebler," and carry a fake driver’s license under that name. The agency had long claimed that Joannides had no such alias, even though “Howard” was the same code name used by a CIA officer working with the Cuban Student Directorate — a group opposed to Castro that, it turns out, the CIA was secretly funding and guiding.

This same group clashed with Oswald in New Orleans just months before the assassination and later helped publicize his pro-Castro views right after Kennedy was killed. For years, the CIA insisted it had no ties to the group — that claim is now clearly false.

Bottom line: "The cover story for Joannides is officially dead," said Jefferson Morley, a journalist and historian who has followed the case closely. “This is significant. The CIA is now shifting its story on Oswald.”

This revelation is part of an ongoing release of JFK records required by a 1992 law and reinforced by a directive from President Trump. While Joannides’ involvement was first hinted at in 1998, each new batch of documents adds more layers to the story.

Here’s the backdrop: Joannides was a top official in the CIA’s Miami station, responsible for political and psychological operations — including the covert management of the anti-Castro Cuban student group known as the DRE (Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil).

On August 9, 1963, members of the DRE got into a street fight with Oswald as he handed out pro-Castro pamphlets in New Orleans. Local media covered the incident. A couple of weeks later, Oswald even debated DRE activists on live TV. After JFK was shot, the group quickly labeled Oswald a communist, a message that was picked up by major newspapers.

Interestingly, just a year before all of this, the Pentagon had floated Operation Northwoods — a proposal to stage a fake attack on the U.S., blame Cuba, and justify an invasion. Though unrelated, it shows the kind of Cold War thinking at the time.

Wider context: These new records don’t solve the mystery of who killed Kennedy, nor do they prove whether Oswald acted alone or not. But they do confirm the CIA was dishonest about its ties to Joannides and the DRE — not just with the public, but with multiple government investigations over the decades.

From the Warren Commission in the ‘60s to congressional probes in the ‘70s and ‘90s, the CIA consistently denied any connection. In reality, Joannides not only had knowledge of Oswald before the killing, but later played a key role in misleading a House committee investigating the assassination.

How? Joannides was made the CIA’s liaison to that committee — but never disclosed that he himself had been involved in the case. He withheld records, gave false assurances, and slowed the investigation. In a 2014 interview, the committee’s chief counsel recalled asking Joannides about "Howard" and the DRE. Joannides claimed no such person existed — though it was him all along.

Another former investigator testified just last month that Joannides actively worked to sabotage the committee’s work. Despite this, the CIA gave him a Career Intelligence Medal in 1981. He died in 1990.

What people are saying: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican currently reviewing the JFK files, said there’s no doubt Joannides was part of a CIA cover-up.

Morley and other assassination researchers believe there’s a real chance rogue elements within the CIA may have played a part in Kennedy’s death — though even Morley stops short of accusing Joannides himself.

Others, like Gerald Posner, still believe Oswald acted alone. But even he agrees: the CIA’s handling of the case was deceptive and shady.

“It’s classic CIA,” Posner told Axios. “They don’t tell the truth, they cloud everything, and when the documents finally come out, it always looks bad.”

The CIA, for its part, insists it has now complied fully with the law and released all JFK-related records to the national archives without redactions.

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The CIA, for its part, insists it has now complied fully with the law and released all JFK-related records to the national archives without redactions.

Riiiight...

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Wasn't project Northwood supposed to have some Cubans fly planes into buildings in Miami?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, member that time the CIA investigated itself for its role in the creation and distribution of crack? (Spoiler alert: they found themselves innocent)

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Oswald was a US Marine who defected to the Soviet Union then came back with his Russian wife. It would be negligence if the CIA/FBI weren't keeping tabs on him.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Crazy how it's always the mother fuckers youd most expect.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The timing of this almost feels like the CIA threatening Trump. He can cause a ruckus and ruin ordinary people's lives, but if he starts to threaten the global economy and/or civilization that happens to supply the billionaires with things like drugs and yachts and ~~sex slaves~~ employees to run them, history might just have to repeat itself.

The article makes it sound like this was scheduled though.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't doubt if the CIA is using trump for their own nefarious plans. When they don't need him any more they'll toss him.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

SVR, Mossad, CIA, is there an intelligence agency that doesn’t have Kompromat on Trump?

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

we are all just tools for them to be used in the game they play.

I think an understanding is coming out that humans have been naive to believe in these people we were taught are protecting us. It feels like something bigger than the taught politics is going on. Something more criminal, evil, and raw. Meaning politics can’t fix it. Picking armies and nations to fight can’t fix it because they are a product of the essence or force that manifests it.

We willingly gave them their authority to manifest hell on earth. Probably due to manipulation via religion and politics that preys on a humans natural existential fear.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 23 hours ago

What a surprise. /s