this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
213 points (99.1% liked)

News

30730 readers
3244 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] three_trains_in_a_trenchcoat@piefed.social 151 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I never ever want to hear another conservative whine at me about the budget as long as I live. FiScAl ReSpOnSiBiLiTy my ass.

TBH, I'm increasingly convinced that this is yet another in a series of moves overtly intended to destroy the federal government's legitimacy.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Was it Susan Colin’s or Murkowski that was saying she voted in favor of the bill knowing it was terrible only because she thought the house would fix it? She knew full well the house wouldn’t do shit but approve it. These people are monsters.

[–] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

MSNBC had murkowski saying something like that

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago

You will hear it from them again and the intended audience will believe it again.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago

I'm increasingly convinced that this is yet another in a series of moves overtly intended to destroy the federal government's legitimacy.

This has been the Republican game since Reagan

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I don't want either party to say it. They have failed

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 60 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Frustrating that there is not a single word in this article about the massive ICE budget increase.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ice-budget-big-beautiful-bill/

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 27 points 18 hours ago

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' to give ICE a larger budget than most of the world's militaries

In all, the version of the bill that passed the Senate earlier this week would see the agency receive around $100billion by 2029, $45billion for detention facilities, the same for border wall operations and a further $14billion to fund mass deportations.

This would put ICE’s budget above that of Israel, Italy, Brazil and the Netherlands.

I have no idea who this source is, but it's an interesting headline. https://www.lbc.co.uk/usa/politics/ice-budget-big-beautiful-bill-donald-trump/

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's no way they need a budget that big for just dealing with illegal immigrants. They must be planning on going after other groups too.

LGBT? Democrats? People of Colour? Scientists? Anyone who disagrees with Trump?

We know where this is headed. I'm waiting for the Americans to figure it out before it's too late.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 2 points 49 minutes ago

It is going to be his private SS, only beholden to Trump. He can use it exactly in any way he wants. Besides the disappearings going to massively increase, they will be an armed military force that he can let loose on protestors and anybody considered to be dissidents.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 54 points 19 hours ago

It was bound to happen, but I'm still sad it did

[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know my disgust could get bigger, but it grew three sizes today.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

🎶 You’re a smart one, Mr Grinch!

You really. Are. Infooooooooormed! 🎶

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 38 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Now they have the funding for the Holocaust 2: El Holocausto (seriously its not funny tho and now is the time to prepare for a fully funded police state)

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

The answer to the immigration question seems eerily leading to the final solution.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 27 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Don't worry everyone, Trump only has 1296 days left in the office.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Shit. Do worry then.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 1 points 52 minutes ago

He has just secured 200 billion funding for his own private SS. 2024 already proved how easy it was for them to buy an election. He is not going anywhere.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's almost surprising that Democrats unanimously voted against

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 25 points 17 hours ago

It was perfectly safe for them to vote against it knowing it would pass anyway. They get to appear on the right side of things without actually making any sacrifices or hard decisions. If it would have been 50/50, I guarantee we would have seen at least one defection.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 18 hours ago

President of death is coming to america again. Brace for impact.