this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
333 points (98.0% liked)

Games

40318 readers
2459 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 90 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find it endlessly amusing how popular Randy thinks the Borderlands games are.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They're objectively extremely popular.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

They are objectively less popular with the newer stuff.

Tiny Tina's Wonderland is at 25% for recent reviews, 70% overall. That's not glowing. And with their new ELUA a lot of people are planning to boycott. I don't think Borderlands has the pull it once did.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And with their new ELUA a lot of people are planning to boycott.

I hope so, but i was expecting more people to boycott Nintendo, and yet the switch 2 was the fastest selling console of all time. I wouldn't be surprised if everyone does the old "I'm sure it's fine if I get a copy"

[–] three@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I think people on the internet vastly overestimate the support these boycott movements actually have. For every person here or wherever else saying they're not buying a switch, there's 10,000 parents buying one for their kids, or people that just wanna play mario kart with their friends.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And typically the boycotters weren't even the sort of people who were buying a switch 2 to begin with. Maybe there's a subsection of them that will result in some loss of sales but it would be in the fraction of a percent. There's no surprise to me when gamer boycotts fail.

With that said, the sales were unexpectedly high. Maybe people trying to get ahead of potential future tariffs were the reason. I thought cost of living was fucked and nobody could afford anything.

I'll be waiting for the inevitable OLED refresh anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Tiny Tina is a spin-off, and I doubt the EULA changes will result in much more than the Modern Warfare 2 boycott. Borderlands 3 still sold multiple millions of copies before it even had its first discount, and over 15 million copies total. It was still in high enough demand after an Epic exclusivity period to get hundreds of thousands of concurrent players when it eventually launched on Steam. It's one of very few multi-billion dollar franchises in video games.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's a fair call on Tiny Tina being a spin off, but with it and the movie kinda tarnishing the name it seems like a bit of an uphill battle.

3 did well, but the game before and after it didn't. Add in people having less money to throw at this stuff and it being "a real fans" price, possible exclusive deals, etc. I just think it's putting up it's own road blocks constantly. The franchise isn't hot and it's fresh off the Borderlands movie joke.

IMO They should fire this wide and fast, keep the price low and sell it everywhere, earn back that trust and good will. Make people fall in love with BL again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also Tiny Tina was actually a fuckin blast to play through. It doesn't drag like some of the main games do, the humor is actually fun because you're basically playing a game within a game and it works as far as D&D stuff goes imo.

Also I actually liked being able to customize my character for once. I don't know about the other voices, but I actually really liked the douchey/cocky voice I ended up going with. There are some fun lines for different quests and such.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The writing in two was really good. I didn't and still don't care who got the writer's WiiU, I just cared that the story was fun.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the writer’s WiiU

I'm assuming this is an autocorrect, but I can't figure out what the word is supposed to be.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, it's a sad tale that would be amusing if it wasn't real people, and has occupied a lot of brain time at 4chan and among gamergate-involved persons. If you want to know more, knowyourmeme has a reasonably objective article.

My understanding is the drama from resulted in him leaving before BL3 was written

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, thanks for the clarification! Never heard anything about that before.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Borderlands 3 sold over 20 million, that's pretty significant even if it is less than 2. The overall quality has certainly gone downhill, but sales is all the companies care about. In my experience boycotts by people who know what's going on behind the scenes never amount to anything - it's always the potential buyers who don't know or care about that stuff that ultimately determine whether a game's successful or not.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Just not as popular as Randy seems to think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago

Customers already told them this by not buying on Epic and waiting 6 months to a year to buy on Steam.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why are people taking this even remotely seriously? This is Pitchford doing marketing for BL4. BL3 already showed people don't want Epic exclusivity and there's no such thing as Steam exclusivity. They can choose to release exclusively on Steam but that's just artificial exclusivity because nothing about Steam prevents them from releasing on Epic or GOG.

It's a pointless poll made by Pitchford either to keep BL4 in the media cycle or to just shit stir, possibly both.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are Steam exclusives, but it's because the publisher chose it to be that way, not because of any incentive by Valve.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

That's what I mean by artificial exclusivity. There are games where the developer or publisher decided it's the only platform they will release on but that kind of "exclusivity" is not at all the same as Epic paying developers or publishers to not release on Steam. Valve/Steam doesn't prevent those games being released elsewhere, the developers/publishers themselves don't want to.

I could understand smaller (I'm talking literal solo devs or studios with less than 10 people) choosing to be exclusively on Steam. Supporting other platforms can have huge overhead costs for them. But for a studio the size of Gearbox there's no benefit to being exclusively on Steam. They have enough support staff to manage multiple stores. There maybe be suits wondering if it's worth being exclusively on Epic but there are no suits sitting around wondering whether to be exclusively on Steam or not, the answer is obviously not.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Any chance he’s putting the question on social media to convince other stakeholders above him?

It’s possible he was in a board meeting when some novice shareholder suggested “What if you take an exclusivity deal”? And he just didn’t have clear evidence on hand of that being vastly unpopular. Obviously that could be me being overgenerous to him.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

There is a chance but what is he convincing them of? That they should take a non-existent exclusivity deal with Steam? They already have the data that exclusivity with Epic does not work and Steam doesn't do exclusivity deals.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Pitchford is a cunt when he wakes up, and when he goes to bed he reviews a checklist to make sure he still retains the appropriate level of cunt in his daily routine.

He's not doing anything unless it makes Randy Pitchford more rich, or alternatively, makes sure he's still a cunting waste of life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Boy, they really are pulling all the stops in trying to make the game shit, aren't they?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The ego on this guy is just unprecedented. It's Borderlands, most people can take it or leave it.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My take is that Borderlands 1 was boring, Borderlands 2 had decent game play but was held up by excellent writing and characterization and every Borderlands game since has been trying to recapture the magic of the second game but just feels hollow. They aren't terrible, but they aren't amazing either.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I feel like borderlands 1 was boring but had some high points, but the dlc really started to capture what the series would become. The general Knox dlc is still one of my favorites.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fucking don't. Put them on GoG.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago

Just don't make exclusives. Steam, GoG, Epic, whatever.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Other than GOTY edition of the first game, this entire series has LAN (so far), which is commendable and stupidly rare! I hope the GOTY edition doesn't show that they're nixing this for BL4 as well.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

5.6% of [respondents] users said they wouldn't pre-order [on Epic] knowing it would influence exclusivity, 2.7% said they would.

They really brought in those big dollars with making Borderlands 3 a timed exclusive on Epic. A whole 9%. Meanwhile, 91.6% of respondents preferred Steam. Bravo, Randy. Bravo.

Disappointingly, 53.9% still would buy it on Steam if it influenced exclusivity going forward. Even if it is Steam—which has a record of providing better service than its competitors—exclusivity helps nobody.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Randy's twitter poll was stupid. He should have asked "if BL3 is exclusive, will you buy it on that platform?" With the options

  • Yes, if it's steam
  • Yes, if it's Epic
  • No
  • STFU Randy, your breath smells like farts
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Doesn't matter if you wait a year or two to get it at the non-hype price with full content included

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Better if they don't, as they don't deserve people's money.

[–] BlurryBits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

Well lets see, you are coming out of one of the biggest tanks ever for the gaming movie franchise. The online mentions are far more jokes about your IP than any kind of nostalgia.

Sure, go exclusive! And make sure you code 60% of your next project with AI - the gamers will love it!

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I long for the era when fans who were asked if they would swallow future exclusivity deals would stare blankly and say, Wat?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

He can put them in the bin for me. Honestly don't see the appeal.

How does that guy still have a job?

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm just here to say my god, that article was horribly written!

If this is what humans are cranking out, maybe I should reconsider my opinion of LLMs.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

And that website is a fucking eyesore.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Randy can swallow my dick.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

I will wait for torrent, if at all

load more comments
view more: next ›