this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
201 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24494 readers
3672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 77 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

I think that he gets a lot of hate, but you have to admit that it's really impressive to switch directions so often and fast without any spine.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A snake moves left to right back and forth, over and over, just to make an inch of progress in the direction they want to go.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 19 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yet, snakes still have a spine.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Nah...they kinda like....undulate.... hydrostatically? Tbh I can't really remember a whole lot of 9th grade bio. They definitely don't squiggle the same way as snakes....more of a piston....y.... motion.....idfk

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

(⌐■_■)

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Without any spine..... Musk.....
wait a minute.....

is Musk a Mollusk ?

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

The first person to make an Elon=Oceanman joke gets an icepick to the kidneys

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

tfw this drugged out fuckwit gets more press for shitting on trump than the entirety of the Democratic party.

collapsed inline media

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That’s partly because unlike Democrats, he’s actually speaking out and taking a contrarian stance on topics.

When he thought he could work with Trump, he went all-in. Now that he realizes that two narcissists will always have conflicting goals, he’s all-in on fighting Trump.

The Democrats, on the other hand, have mostly spent this time saying “let’s discuss working together to come to an agreeable compromise” while doing not much that’s actually useful one way or the other.

Elon may be politically inept and only looking out for his own interests, but he does know how to grab the public’s attention and how to force people to act.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Find me the quotes where Democrats say let's come to an agreeable compromise and I'll match them with Democrat quotes actually speaking out and taking a contrarian stance on topics. Heck I'll triple them.

The issue is that corporate news sewers do not care about the public's interest or a healthy government. They care about money, and Elmo stories generate money.

That's why the Democrats have to start lighting some shit on fire.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Because the other billionaires who own the media really really really want to avoid progressives accomplishing anything.

So now that neoliberals are out of control of the DNC, the media isn't going to have many good things to say about the DNC.

I'd say that's obviously, but holy shit some days I feel like I'm explaining it to the same 12 people who just can't fucking grasp that billionaire owned media favors billionaires.

Like, could you imagine someone falling for that dumb shit and getting mad at anyone other than the fucking Nazi in your gif and the media system defending fascism

[–] False@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I haven't kept up with the plot this season. Trump's nemesis is still Biden right? Or did Obama somehow return?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's a Republican that's not voting how trump wants, specifically the budget.

So trump made an entire PAC to primary him, now Musk is backing him against Trump's pac.

And apparently Musk is gonna make a 3rd party if the budget passes?

Which would be amazing. If Musk and Trump both have their own parties, it just splits the Republican vote. Regardless of policy, no one is switching from D to either of those asshats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

no one is switching from D to either of those asshats.

Well, hopefully very few. I mean, not that long ago, we had the whole Jill Stein thing....

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

If Stein had never run, there's a percentage of Greens who would've voted Democrat instead.

I think there's a huge difference between what Greens and Democrats think that percentage is.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It won't split the GOP vote, though. Musk already went down this path a few weeks ago and literally every politician sided with Trump. For all the money he has, the only political influence he ever had was through Trump. Nobody in the GOP cared about or even liked the guy beyond that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For all the money he has, the only political influence he ever had was through Trump.

No, you're right ..

I completely forgot money doesn't play a roll in the American political system

/S

Like, what kind of logic are you using that makes you think money just doesn't fucking matter?

Especially in Republican primaries?

I dunno, maybe there's some I missed, but what you just said....

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Did you pay any attention to the last time Musk tried this? It was only a couple of weeks ago that he threatened virtually the same thing: To make an anti-Trump conservative party in order to take him on. And the entire GOP basically laughed in his face, many of them openly to the press. Lose the backhanded sarcasm, it's neither funny nor impressive.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago

No, no...

Clearly you're right! How the fuck could I think that Republican politicians could be bought*.

Those great upstanding citizens who always put their personal profit last.

/s

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In Obama II: Birth Certificate Boogaloo, they find the long form version of the birth certificate and he becomes Super Kenyan, where he eats all the dogs and cats in the neighborhood before pretending he will get single payer health care passed.

[–] False@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Thanks Obama

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

If he tries to run a third term, I always thought it would be hilarious if Obama ran against him. Like, he'd absolutely win.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

No I think it's one of the representatives that voted against his bill.

[–] BlurryBits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

You didn't hear? They have recast John Simm to play The Master..

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Elon Musk has promised to donate to Rep. Thomas Massie’s re-election campaign as the Kentucky Republican faces down the wrath of Donald Trump.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

for a second there, I thought he was gonna donate to Obama or something.

eh. that'd be something.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 15 hours ago

The writers at The Daily Beast have such a talent for hyperbole.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 28 points 15 hours ago

Mom, the billionairs are using their wealth to manipulate who gets elected again.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 hours ago

Trump's Nemesis? That would be a socialist. A very decent and articulated socialist.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago

Like Zohran?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

It's all distraction. Once the bigly budget passes, they'll be back to circle jerks and sleepovers with Fox on the teeveez.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

This is why kids should learn impulse control.

[–] JakoJakoJako13@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

The law sitting in the background like Undertaker when he got drafted to Raw.