this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
265 points (96.8% liked)

News

30641 readers
4123 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 233 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's an interesting way of saying statutory rape.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 130 points 1 day ago (2 children)

its kinda gross how far the media will go to not use the word rape... especially in this context

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Trump's a rapist but the media is afraid to say so. Suspected pedo, too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They’re not lawyers, though… they’re reporters.

They’re just reporting what the prosecutors accused the person of and if the prosecutor didn’t use the term “statutory rape” then the reporters probably shouldn’t either.

They don’t want to get the reporting wrong if they aren’t experts on the subject and even more so the don’t want to expose themselves to lawsuits if they do get the reporting wrong.

I really don’t think the reporters are trying to minimize the heinousness of the crime (at least not in this case). It looks more like they are just being conservative in what they state.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

also; reporters dont write headlines

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That’s true but the same issue applies to both the article (which doesn’t use the term “statutory rape”), and the editor (who likely doesn’t have any legal expertise).

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m not very surprised that a teacher raped a student. I AM surprised (and glad) that she was dumb enough to talk about it TO ANOTHER TEACHER.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Might be a power thing, but what adult woman wants an inexperienced 16 year old?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A pedophile.

Like literally, by definition.

10 year age gap there, 26 yo woman vs 16 yo dude.

Flip the sexes around, that's a pedophile, no argument at all.

Other than from people who really, really really feel its necesarry to 'well actually you mean ephebophile'.

Grooming is kinda the whole modus operandi here, they get off on the power dynamic, in every way you can interperet 'get off' and 'power dynamic'.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (15 children)

Considering he is above the age of consent it is obviously NOT pedophilia.
If she had been a neighbor it would be legal. The reason it isn't is because she is a figure of authority. Which technically from a legal perspective makes it rape.
In 14 US states it is actually legal!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Are you really saying 14 states have legalized pedophilia?
Do you even remember how it is to be 16?

My sister has been happily married to her husband who is 15 years older than her for 30+ years, are you saying my brother in law is a pedophile because of the age difference?

You are judgemental and pushing your norms on other people. And it's disgusting you have so many upvotes!

I had decided to resign from this debate, but some of the comments here, like yours are just so far beyond what lawmakers have decided in by far the most countries it's insane. Are you also considering LGBT immoral?

It's wrong yes, but the term pedo should be reserved for when it's justified, which it isn't here.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Enthusiasm can often beat experience.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

still rape from a pedo, that things really mess with people's brain.

hope he gets the help he needs

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I was the 16 year old once, it's a lot of things, but mostly I think it was the power trip for her.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Insecurity. "Yep I've still got it!"

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Easier to train.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I think that part of this narrative gets fucked because there is a fairly large segment of reporters that fantasized about getting with their cute youngish teacher back when they were in school.

This is not to say that this is ok. It isn't. This is SA, CSA, really. And even if the teacher were teaching/seducing 18 year olds on a college campus it would still be a gross misuse of power.

[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

One who wants a one sided deal that she snd she alone controls. There's never a shortage or men who look for other women, but then these kind of people should adapt to an actual relationship.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 38 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How are so many people incapable of doing the literally most obvious and easy task of "do not fuck children" JFC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Rape. It was rape. Call it what it is. The longer we tiptoe around teachers having sex with kids, the longer the problem will exist. She raped a kid.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dgbbad@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 hours ago

As someone who works IT at a school, this is far too common. I've ignored many a new teacher coming up to me with questions because I thought they were students, and I ignore students at all cost. This has happened in the intermediate buildings. You just can't know how old anyone is anymore, so I assume everyone is underage until proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

For people that are downvoting, this entire bit in South Park was to make fun of the double standard whenever a man commits statutory rape vs when a woman does it

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But also it's @SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world

More downvotes than most in their content

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago

That being said, they usually say the funny thing. I guess they should make a /c of their comments named something like "what the devil inside thinks".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Blows my mind every time it's some young, attractive woman.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

She’ll probably just use the Mel Gibson defense.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 11 hours ago

How stupid do you have to be to tell a coworker that you raped a kid. Hey, how was your weekend? Guess what I did that's super illegal?

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 15 points 18 hours ago

Since when is telling a coworker a crime /s

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

I don't get this. Not even high school girls find high school boys attractive. How could a grown woman? And what's with the language, the word is raped or sexually abused/assaulted, 16 year old here is assumed unable to consent to sex with any adult.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

😱 How does this still happen in this day and age?

[–] HenryDorsett@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because pedophilia still exists.

And a 16 year old boy will say yes to pretty much anything sexual, hence why this woman ~~exploited a minor~~ nah, not sugar coating. This woman used a position of authority to rape a child.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also. The teacher profession is all but dead in America. A lot of people that would be bad for students get weeded out through years of education and training. Most school districts are luck if they have more than 50% of their teachers educated/trained. The rest are individuals who could pass a background check. Poor areas, are under 30%. Just because someone can pass a background check doesn't mean they should be around minors. But schools have no other option.

[–] HenryDorsett@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Heh, I applied for a substitute position a little while ago.

Called back. I'm a MMJ patient, and only have a high school diploma, and no teaching skills or experience.

They were fine with that. Obviously, don't bring drugs on campus, but if its just residual in my system its fine with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Rape. It was rape. Call it what it is. The longer we tiptoe around teachers having sex with kids, the longer the problem will exist. She raped a kid.

load more comments
view more: next ›