this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
92 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

72017 readers
3348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 40 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The world already is that way though...

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 12 points 18 hours ago

My business partner sometimes says some shit that while true, really stabs me in the heart.

His most recent one, "Ugh, there's too many parents with sickly kids here. Let's go to the VIP room." (At the airport)

Like, I'm one of those sickly kids.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not entirely sure of that. While corporate AI would certainly cause that, right now there are open weights models which can be run on a relatively affordable computer, and they are not that far behind. These models are able to democratize AI benefits rather than concentrate it.

[–] SufferingSteve@feddit.nu 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah because if everyone is extremely cheap labour everyone will prosper? :)

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Not necessarily, but everyone having access to cheap labor AND raw materials would ensure that.

Now I’m not going to pretend that AI is anywhere close to being a source of cheap labor. It really can’t do much without a human to assist it.

[–] SufferingSteve@feddit.nu 2 points 4 hours ago

I admire your positivity. I do not share it though, because from what I have seen, because even if there are open weights, the one with the biggest datacenter will in the future hold the most intelligent and performance model.

Very similar to how even if storage space is very cheap today, large companies are holding all the data anyway.

AI will go the same way, and thus the megacorps will and in some extent already are owning not only our data, but our thoughts and the ability to modify them.

I mean, sponsored prompt injection is just the first thought modifying thing, imagine Google search sponsored hits, but instead it's a hyperconvincing AI response that subtly nudges you to a certain brand or way of thinking.

Absolutely terrifies me, especially with all the research Meta has done on how to manipulate people's mood and behaviour through which social media posts they are presented with

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 8 points 18 hours ago

I am remarkably annoyed by this guy making predictions on measurable things that he then entirely vibe-checks.

[–] rodneyck@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A.I. will destroy the professional managerial class, the ones that keep voting for neo-liberals/neo-cons, and policies that support A.I., a bit of irony. Let them feel the pain of the working and poor classes, no more over-paid glorified babysitter jobs. Then, just maybe, we can all vote for real working class heroes, and reform.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ha, that's pretty optimistic to think after all this that democracy and voting will still be part of the picture.

[–] SufferingSteve@feddit.nu 2 points 18 hours ago

I'll just ask chatgpt to do the research and vote for me