this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
1913 points (99.1% liked)

News

30641 readers
3807 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Nobody should have a right to more than, say, 10 million dollars. Any worth over that, tax it at 100%.

Similarly for companies, tax them dynamically. Ybr bigger the company, the higher the tax. At, say, over a billion dollars, tax it 100%. Limit company sizes to 1000 employees.

This way, nobody is too big, nobody is too powerful, nobody is too rich

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

He's right. Let's see if people could live off 999 million in assets.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 13 points 20 hours ago

A mere 999 million!?! You monsters want these people to starve in the streets...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I agree there is no reason why an individual should have that much economic power. There is no justification for that amount of wealth in so few hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not that we shouldn't have billionaires. Its that we have billionaires when we have people living on the streets because the rent is so ridiculous. Its that we have people dying on the streets because they cannot afford health insurance. The gravy on the shit-fest is that billionaires are actively bribing the politicians to prevent those policies from being implemented. That is the textbook recipe for guillotines.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

All of these are reasons why we shouldn't have billionaires, though.
I mean, I agree. It's very bad out there.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago

And he's right.

By any measure, the exidtence of that great of a disparity in wealth in a society is evidence of the failure of the systems on which that society is built.

It's akin to if you were responsible for caring for a field of crops, and you ended up with a field in which two or three plants were enormous, bloated and overgrown. a few were more or less healthy, snd the rest were weak and shriveled and starving.

That rather obviously would mean you'd failed.

[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What is the other sides' argument for why we SHOULD have billionaires?
Genuinely asking if they have anything tough to contend with or is it just another critical avoidance of theirs?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I usually get some variation of “They worked hard and deserve the reward. We shouldn’t take that away from them, they earned it fairly.” Yes, it’s infuriating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaire says 'I don't think we should have Zohran Mamdani '

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago

Luigi has entered the chat.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

The whole billionaire thing is completely arbitrary. It used to be that being a millionaire was a big deal. With inflation, in a couple more years we'll have trillionaires, if Mohammed bin Salman hasn't become the first one already.

If you make more than most people, regardless of how much that is, you should be heavily taxed.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

not surprised considering his other views but glad to see his courage in sticking to his principles against a very biased media landscape. even his rap was fun af. this guy never misses.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago

He's going to send so many right-wing working poors into hysterics over that.

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great idea. You only need enough money for one lifetime. Not 100000

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Not a strong stance to be anti-thief. I'll take it though! We all need to speak plain sense more often.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I worry the billionaires will send assassins after him. It would cost them so much less than what he's suggesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Zohran the destroyer of billionaires

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 11 points 14 hours ago

I don't think we should have the situations and lack of regulation that leads to billionaires, especially as it will likely continue to drain/erode the quality-of-life for everyone else to eventually lead to trillionaires...

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

BREAKING: Worlds most based man strikes again

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago

So happy to finally find a politician who agrees with me

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, we probably shouldn't have people who horde so much wealth it negatively affects the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's going to get killed... Isn't he...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›