this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
401 points (98.5% liked)

World News

47851 readers
1860 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Europeans still aren't buying Teslas with figures out Wednesday showing sales plunged for a fifth month in a row in May, a blow to investors who had hoped anger toward Elon Musk would have faded by now.

Tesla sales fell 28% last month in 30 European countries even as the overall market for electric vehicles expanded sharply, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association. The poor showing comes after Tesla's billionaire CEO had promised a “major rebound” was coming last month, adding to a recent buying frenzy among investors.

They were selling on Wednesday, pushing the prices down more than 4% in early afternoon trading.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sznowicki@lemmy.world 65 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Apart of Elon being idiot why would we even consider buying Tesla anyway? Competition is much better when it comes to things like access to authorized service. Charging network is a non-issue in Europe as we have full roaming and one socket standard and brands like Kia, Mercedes or even BYD have competitive prices while all being great quality.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 39 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Also, one huge Pro to not having a tesla is not having to worry about it blowing up for no reason.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

c'mon, incidental explosions are what make life exciting!

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Or it being a death trap in an accident.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

According to Tim Urban's blog article on Tesla and Muck from 2015, one of Muck's stated goals was to jumpstart the other auto manufacturers into producing their own EVs to accelerate the trend toward a more sustainable energy future. Whether that was true then or now is irrelevant, but it is nice to see EVs of many brands being made and purchased. Obligatory Fuck Muck, existential disappointment that he will forever be.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That is the one credit I will give to Tesla and Musk, they made the EV not only a realistic choice, but actually cool.

The original Model S was a cool car when it was launched, but now there are plenty of other cooler alternatives.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

It's not rare for the first company to bring a product to market to not be the top dog once other companies get involved.

For instance, Kodak pretty much invented the digital camera, but Canon and Nikon are the clear leaders now while Kodak's digital camera division was sold off.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It’s not rare for the first company to bring a product to market to not be the top dog once other companies get involved.

Except Tesla wasn't the first mass market EV. It wasn't even the second. The first would be the GM EV1 in 1997:

collapsed inline media

Many would argue that the EV1 doesn't count because it was on old technology. Fine then, the Nissan Leaf from 2009 then sporting its lithium battery:

collapsed inline media

Tesla Model S brought performance, range and styling that both of those were missing. However, we don't need Tesla anymore in the world if Musk is still benefiting from it.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Electric cars have been around for a very long time. According to Wikipedia, in 1912, 38% of 33,842 cars in the US were electric.

I think that Tesla showed that a modern performance car could be electric. It made electric cars cool again.

I would never be caught in a Tesla though.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Those advancements were made possible by the Roadster, which was the true pioneering product that made EVs cool again. A car that was dreamed up and invented by Martin Eberhard, and would go on to be built by someone else that gave him the shittiest end of the most shit-covered stick there ever was.

Everything that has given Tesla a reputation as an imnovative company was either done by the original inventor or their amazing engineers over the years.

Elon brings money and celebrity recognition to the company. If the celebrity recognition turns and becomes a net negative, the money is going to start becoming an issue too because his loans might get called and then he's got nothing to bring to the table. I choose to dream about that future right now.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Those advancements were made possible by the Roadster, which was the true pioneering product that made EVs cool again. A car that was dreamed up and invented by Martin Eberhard, and would go on to be built by someone else that gave him the shittiest end of the most shit-covered stick there ever was.

All credit due to Eberhard and Tarpenning for the idea and some of the initial development of the BMS, but its not like they had a full car ready to sell and before Musk came in. Tesla was established as a company in 2003, Musk was brought in (with his money) in 2004. The first Roadster sold in 2008. Now stop making me say anything positive about Musk just to set the record straight. Its making me sick to talk about him positively after what he's become and how much harm he has caused human society.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Xerox has entered the chat, with the first commercial photocopier, the GUI, laser printer, and computer mouse, in addition to the ones you think of.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In Tesla's case, its because they rushed to beat the competition. You'll notice they were a "tech company" not a traditional car company. The actual car companies came out with mature, fully baked, offerings rather than trying to be the first.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 42 minutes ago

Oh boy, you haven't heard of the ID.3, have you? Or the bzx4. Or the corsa. Or...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The current move towards electrification would not have happened or would have taken a lot over without Tesla. The Model 3 really was a huge breakthrough by showing that you can build a car that people actually want to drive and make it affordable. That pretty much made all the excuses of the incumbents moot.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Rivian seems better in literally every way, isn't it?

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

It's been a while since I looked at EVs, but my (US) experience at the time was that Tesla was one of very few companies offering sedan-shaped EVs. The US market was full of crossovers & SUVs (like Rivian), and that form factor seems antagonistic to many of the things that make high performance, long range EVs: terrible aerodynamics, high body weight, poor visibility... They're big enough to fill will batteries to compensate for the poor efficiency, but that just raises costs.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Had a conversation about this the other day with a coworker, albeit about ICE cars but still applicable I think. Car manufacturers made tremendous progress in effeciency and negated all of that by justifying making their cars 2x bigger than they were 20 years ago. It's ridiculous. A modern Subaru Outback is about the same size as a mid-90s Suburban. Gets about the same mileage as my 2001 Outback, even with all the effeciency tech

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Fair points! In my mind I guess I was thinking cyber truck vs. Rivian truck.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Don't know about availability in the US, but at least in Europe there are many, many alternatives out there, both from traditional brands (Mercedes, BMW, etc etc) and more recently, from Chinese brands.

A friend bought a BYD Seal the other day, he got a total bargain for their top version at 41k€, but that got me looking into them, and their lineup is looking pretty impressive.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

In Europe at least, Chinese cars.

Last month on my neck of the woods, YoY car sales were up 16% and yet Tesla was down 68% this month alone, while BYD was up 331,6% (yes, 3 digits).

With these changes, Tesla isn't even in the top 10 anymore (at one point it was #2!) and has been leapfrogged by BYD, who seems very likely to continue climbing and break into the top 3 sellers.

Tesla is dead.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)
[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I am unaware of any other EV that has sentry mode on the cameras like that on the Tesla. Would absolutely love to be proven wrong.

AFAIK Kia has a Korean only release EV6 that had it, but none of the other options utilise the whole suite of cameras to record.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But is it needed on anything other than a Tesla?

[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've had a Ford (mid range SUV) and a Toyota (base model sedan) which were both damaged whilst parked, and nobody left a note. Lots of people posting in the community groups about carpark damage and no notes being left, and no luck with local cameras.

So yes, it is needed.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And that's a very fair point, but at least around me, the deductible costs about 100€ if someone damages my car while it's legally parked. I'm not going to worry much about someone dinging my car once in a blue moon with that kind of deductible, and I'm definately not going to pay ekstra to get a fancy camera system.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 39 minutes ago

What about your insurance rates going up?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why is sentry mode the the bar to cross?

[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's not specifically "the" bar, but the original comment was saying they didn't see how Tesla would even be considered, and I felt this feature is one reason why someone may still consider a Tesla.

For me, my dash cameras have come in handy when my vehicle was running, but the hardwire mode has not been able to handle what I wanted it to. I want my next vehicle (whenever that may be) to be an improvement over what I already have. I have personally had my vehicles damaged more than once whilst it was parked, and I have always parked well. Sentry mode would have been very bloody useful to have the responsible parties pay up. Instead, I was left with a damaged car, which was notably rather heartbreaking when one incident occurred within the first month of ownership.

EDIT: My motorcycle was hit and if I hadn't had known, I wouldn't have been aware enough to take it to the shop to be inspected in case any of the internals had been damaged. Sometimes damage can be internal and without an alert, you would be putting yourself in danger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hefejefe@lemmy.world 36 points 8 hours ago

Looks like Elon took the “shut your stupid fucking mouth up” advice. Too bad the damage to his image is irreversible. Oh well. I’m afraid I’m all out of tiny violins as well.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 31 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

🤣 🤣

a blow to investors who had hoped anger toward Elon Musk would have faded by now

Methinks they may have underestimated Elonazi's dickishness, stupidity, arrogance, and power to piss people off...

OMG that's funny. 🤣 🤣

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Not too mention Tesla stock being his slush fund to ruin the world with his Nazi bullshit

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 16 points 9 hours ago

Needs to be in the negative worldwide.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

who had hoped anger toward Elon Musk would have faded by now

Even fucking goldfish remember what he's done. He has irreversibly associated Nazism with Tesla at the same time that cheaper and better electric vehicles are coming out of China. The only way is down and that's not going to change until he is no longer part of Tesla and a lot of time has passed.

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hey elon dont worry the right wing nut jobs are gonna start buying your teslas, ah right most of them are broke lol

[–] dinren@discuss.online 9 points 4 hours ago

“You could charge it with solar for free”

“Fuck you libtard”

😂

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Even better they don't drive teslas cause they want those gas guzzler.

[–] kebab@endlesstalk.org 11 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Sad part is that they’re getting outcompeted by the Chinese EVs, not the European carmakers. The whole money will just fund CCP’s ambitions instead of US ambitions, neither of which is good for European future

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hate how much BYD pays people off. And they're suing people in China for "damaging their brand". I guess so did Tesla that one time, but only one of them runs slave camps (including outside of China).

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Even European brands like Polestar belong to Chinese companies by a large share. But yes, German car manufacturers were asleep at the wheel and now they even lobby against the combustion engine ban because they would be left with near zero business.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 34 minutes ago

Do you have numbers? Because Chinese cars are growing by triple digits because they were basically at 0, the numbers I saw recently VW, stellantis, Hyundai, BMW and Mercedes were in the top 10.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Well, at least his big robotaxi trial is going smoothl— uh, oh no.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Oh, i thought it was only down because Elon was off in Washington making America super awesome and not around to provide his brilliant leadership to Tesla

[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Elon, take that bitch! how do you like it? Don’t like it? Well here it comes anyway!

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

Ohhhh, nooohhhh...! How teeeeerrible...! I'm shóck!

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Einer geht noch! 🎶

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Mmmmmm...delicious

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, at least his rockets aren’t blowi— oh, too bad.

load more comments
view more: next ›