this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
1558 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

71866 readers
4664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 350 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 147 points 19 hours ago (25 children)

There's a reason ICE conceal their faces.

They know what they're doing is wrong and don't want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 58 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they 'accidentally' shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.

of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I believe having lack of evidence being the evidence for a crime is problematic, but it sure is evidence enough that they aren't fit for their job and they should immediately lose it. Everyone Including the supervisor who failed to run the team properly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 47 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that "all of the sudden," while at present a nonstandard variant of "all of a sudden," has valid history.

And of course it doesn't matter in this casual context!

But in formal writing, in this era, using "a" will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 19 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

"All of the sudden" is only valid because it's so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that's just how language works.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

"of the sudden" (1570) actually predates "of a sudden" (Shakespeare) according to my OED as squinted at through the nifty magnifying glass. But it's been considered obsolete for a long time despite having all of a sudden experienced a resurgence.

(Note, I modernized the spellings of "sudden" rather than try to switch focus back and forth)

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 15 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Can't we just embrace adverbification and agree to write "suddenly"?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Non-Anglo here.
Totally not distracted bcs my brain autocorrected it to “all of a sudden” without even noticing.
A bit like "It deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are"
Also never seen/heard the "the" variant. (Well consciously that is).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 137 points 22 hours ago
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 136 points 22 hours ago
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 122 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If only CSI enhancing worked in real life, we could out the asshole on the far left.

collapsed inline media

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

far left

From his PoV, he's actually standing on the far-right. Fitting lol

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 114 points 20 hours ago
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 105 points 21 hours ago

This is ILLEGAL when Working Class people Do It!

-Chuck Schumer at Some Point probably!

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 86 points 22 hours ago (12 children)

Is it me or is LA the only part of America doing anything resembling resistance?

[–] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 96 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's mainly LA that is seeing a large invasion of federal forces

[–] match@pawb.social 27 points 21 hours ago

For the moment

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 23 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

No, it’s happening everywhere. But I’ve also seen some significant resistance happening in other cities like NYC, Newark, Portland, Chicago, Seattle, SF, etc.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 72 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Should be easy to beat this and not worry about being identified and sued.

I know it will be hard guys, but how about:

"Don't be a power tripping asshole"

You see people holding signs?

Don't be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.

You see people marching?

Don't be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.

You see reporters documenting it all?

Don't be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.

"Don't be a power tripping asshole."

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 51 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Also, “Don’t violate people’s constitutional rights, which you must have at least tangentially sworn to protect and uphold.” 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

"You hear them boys?! We are not to humiliate those idiots! LIVE ROUNDS BOYS!"

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

but what if they glare at me very menacingly, surely I can then shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 66 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

nice.

Is there one for ice too?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Also what about cops outside of the LAPD? This app only useful if it works on any cop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No. Those are gravy Seal wannabees. Ice isn't doing anything on the streets. They are doing the behind the scenes stuff. Deputized bounty hunters are the ones in the streets. No badge, no authority, and as you know instantly disavowed.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

So the people doing the snatching are gig workers? Is there a TaskRabbit for fascism?

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Lol but yes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I took a selfie and it told me I was an ice agent.... Wtf I'm such a piece of shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 62 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Lmao let's see how long it takes them to shut this down

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 57 points 21 hours ago (14 children)

What are they so afraid of? They're public servants, so they should be publicly identifiable. If they don't like it, get off the government payroll

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 35 points 20 hours ago

Police the police

[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 17 hours ago

Putting it out there for someone to do this for cops in the UK. I can't run infrastructure but the cops terrorise out local community and constantly refuse to identify themselves/turn off their badge cam.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 21 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (15 children)

I agree with that the abusive cops and ice is insane in the US, and it should be stopped. I also believe that the US is a corrupt nation in nearly every place of the government and surrounding instances.

But a question surround this, what if the US wasn't corrupt and the judges would actually follow the law (juries wouldn't be able to exist for most cases) and hypothetical if the US had privacy laws for everything besides businesses wouldn't this be the same punishable offence that would protect citizens?

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody. (Some people are trying to destroy this in some countries, though).

At the same time, if the government is allowed to use facial recognition and other anti-privacy measures to identify people where there is no ground to, then why shouldn't the people be able to do that?

Edit: I am not from the US and my look on life and trias political situations is different than what the fuck is happening in the US

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] jfrnz@lemm.ee 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 18 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Since they're typically masked, I'd like to see gait recognition serve the working class for once.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 11 points 19 hours ago

I was thinking this too! Gait recognition can completely bypass facial coverings as a means of identification, but I also don't think it'll be much help here.

Gait recognition can be bypassed by things as simple as putting a rock in your shoe so you walk differently, so when you think about how much extra heavy gear, different shoes, and different overall movement patterns ICE agents will possibly be engaging in, it might not hold up well at tracking them down, especially since to recognize someone by gait, you'd need footage of them that you can already identify them in, to then train the model on.

In the case of fucklapd.com, this was easy because they could just get public record data for headshot photos, but there isn't a comparable database with names directly tied to it for gait. I will say though, a lot of these undercover agents might be easier to track by gait since they'll still generally be wearing more normal attire, and it might be more possible to associate them with who they are outside of work since it's easier to slip up when you're just wearing normal clothes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. But this shit will get sued so quick because “safety”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Good. ACAB.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 11 points 5 hours ago

Should be the ice agents too

load more comments
view more: next ›