this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
335 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

71866 readers
4041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 87 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why would anyone want to watch AI generated content? What's the point? I get using AI generation as a tool but if there's no human intention behind it, just a pure algorithm, why even bother?

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Sometimes I'll watch a video and as soon as I realize the voice is AI generated, I stop watching

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was me once a month but now it's a few times a day.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Really? I very rarely come across it, and I use YouTube a lot. But when I do come across it I select "don't recommend channel again" and dislike the video.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You already clicked. It doesn't matter anymore.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Watch time is pretty important on YouTube afaik, initial clocks themselves don't count for that much

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 22 hours ago

I've clicked, but I have an ad-blocker, so... YouTube gained nothing from that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Art is people making stuff, without the people... it's just stuff.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Can still be very pretty though. I use it to set scenes and show characters for my dungeons and dragons campaign.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Unpopular opinion: the fact that said stuff matches my style / that I like it is what makes art worth anything to me. Being made by a person or a fish or a machine doesnt matter. It's the STUFF I want on my wall or the end table, not the fact that it's tacitly human crafted. Any art I can afford is made by someone who is basically a faceless deal, not someone I know personally (or else the person matters) or someone who is famous (in which the person matters). Ergo... the people don't typically matter.

Im not going to an insane restaurant to fanboy the chef, I'm going to eat the FOOD. If a machine makes it and every single dish is atomically identical, that's fine, as long as it's super tasty.

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not like you can learn from it (even if the topic is something you'll never use like a 2 hour dissertation on heat pumps or a multi-video series on how an old pinball machine uses only relays to calculate scores).

Why yes, I am subscribed to Technology Connections, how could you tell?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love heat pumps I love heat pumps I love heat pumps

(I agree! I do love tech connections. Although I'd argue that knowing how heat pumps work can be quite beneficial ^^ at least in my case)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I subscribed to him as well. His Patreon is even better.

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I've been meaning to add his patreon. I have too many as it is and need to call a bit, but I just feel guilty about it.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago

Because now there literally will be infinite content for doom scrolling addicts.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There’s an example right in the article.

Historical events portrayed realistically is one.

[–] EighteenthNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Which is the second most scary thing AI can do.

The first is realistic portrayal of faked current events.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Damn. I read the headline, and I almost thought it was a "Report AI Slop" button. What a feature that would be!

[–] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Was still thinking that until I read this comment. Tiktok is unwatchable (I mean more than before even) because of this. Luckily longer videos are still hard to produce with AI

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Creators led this revolution"

The same way cows lead a slaughterhouse.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

No-one knows chicken like chickens!

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh boy, a button that generates ai shorts. Combining my 2 least favorite things about YouTube.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Buttons and shorts? Yeah, I also like watching bottomless people sometimes.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

We are not the same, I usually choose to watch people with an excess amount of bottom.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The "Unhook" addon (increasingly required for Youtube now, in my opinion) will still completely block this as it blocks all shorts. Fuck shorts anyway. Also as TechnologyConnections pointed out in a recent video, the subscription feed still and always has completely bypasses Youtube's recommended brainrot anyway and allows you to subscribe to and follow the creators and topics you actually care about. Until we have a viable alternative to Youtube (and hopefully stuff like this will drive that to happen sooner rather than later) the other option is to stick to subscriptions as much as possible and only subscribe to creators that don't abuse this or use shorts at all, preferably.

[–] Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It absolutely blew my mind when TechnologyConnections shared the % of users who use the subscription page to get to their videos...

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The vast majority of people stick with defaults, no matter how shitty they are.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

YouTube also defaults to it, so if you open it, and the video you want is already there, no need to jump to another page to load the exact same video.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

the subscription feed still and always has completely bypasses Youtube’s recommended brainrot anyway

Though they are messing with that too, on mobile there is a "Most Relevant" section on top. Though thankfully they are videos from your subs.
...for now.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with the subscription feed is that it shows you every channel that you're subscribed to. If I only want to see cooking videos for example, then it has to be through the standard YouTube recommendations page. What it needs is the ability to manually group channels and let us choose which set of channels we want to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Twanquility@feddit.dk 33 points 1 day ago

"That’s right, a one-stop shop for AI slop is incoming", brilliant sentence.

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I really wish more people would get behind peertube. I also wish some awesome person/s with coding skills could create an app compatible with smartTV's (esp., android).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

YouTube should be fixing their buggy mess of a YouTube app, what a disaster. Every change they make, makes it worse.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too bad this probably still won't drive people to other platforms.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Being a monopoly does that, yeah.

[–] ter_maxima@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Chiarottide@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've been using reVanced lately. It is a YouTube patcher, not a standalone application, but it's good enough for me https://github.com/ReVanced/revanced-manager/

load more comments (3 replies)

I started using PipePipe, which is a fork of NewPipe that allows for signing into a Google account to authenticate.

I create dummy Google accounts using an old Android phone, as that doesn't require a phone number.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ter_maxima@jlai.lu 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Every video fails to play, the only solution I've been recommended SK far is to disable my VPN but I don't want to for privacy reasons.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

"One slop please"

load more comments
view more: next ›