this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
502 points (90.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46671 readers
582 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried testing a movie from my home server in plex through firefox and repeatedly got this message, even after reloading.

I knew that they had paywalled the apps on mobile and streaming from outside the network but now they have also blocked watching your own movies through your own hardware.

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

Even a pop up that says "we need you to donate please" would have been fine. make it pop up before every movie, play donation ads before any movie but straight up disabling the app is kinda cruel.

Anyway, i have switched to jellyfin and it is insanely good. please give it a try. you can run it alongside plex with not issues (at least i had none) and compare the two.

In any case, good luck. Let me know if you need help.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 149 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Jellyfin is great, but in defense of Plex, they announced that remote streaming would require one of the two parties to have a Plex pass was coming back in March so I don't know if it's fair to say they are holding anything hostage.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I started down the Jellyfin path after they made that announcement. It's super easy to install, and in many ways the UI is nicer than Plex. But I ran into challenges getting my server safely accessible for users outside my LAN. And I haven't had the time to look into that further.

Would be great if there was a clean, easy way to set up the webserver portion so it's as easy to share content entirely as Plex. But I get they are a volunteer project with a lot on their plate.

[–] easydnesto@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I have had great success with tailscale in this regard.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The same tailscale that announced last week that they are going to start charging?

https://tailscale.com/kb/1251/pricing-faq

[–] Bubs@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Took a quick look at the free tier,

  • 3 users
  • 100 devices
  • Basically all tailscale features

That seems pretty reasonable to me. Main account and two accounts to share. With just friends and family, I doubt most people will reach the 100 device limit.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they’re calling it remote streaming when you’re on the same (local) network, that’s not exactly intuitive. I’d say OP’s phrasing was fair.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago (11 children)

OP has a misconfigured server and isn't connecting to their server over LAN.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Every non-Free Software will betray you eventually. It's only a matter of time.

[–] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (49 children)

In this thread:

  1. An OP that doesn’t understand how their network is working
  2. People rushing to suggest a solution that they fawn over because it’s open source. I have yet to see anyone recommend Emby.
  3. “Tailscale will solve all your problems!” Great - how do I make that work on an LG TV that’s 100 miles away?
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (21 children)
  1. Open source has high immunity to devs making changes at the expense of user for their benefit because anti-features can be removed. Recommending another proprietary alternative here would be like saying they aught to leave an abusive partner but then recommend someone with the same red flags.
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

3 - An OpenWRT router with Wireguard connecting to another router 1000 miles away will do the trick.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Remote, yes, they announced you need Plex pass one side or the other for it to work.

Local, no, that shouldn't happen. Your device isn't reaching your Plex server locally.

To work around the remote issue, you can VPN to your local network.

But you're better off in the long haul with Jellyfin as you're doing now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago (20 children)

It's pretty rare that a company starts taking away free features and doesn't end up fucking payers in the end.

The biggest bar to Jellyfin is TV clients, the second biggest is security.

TV clients can be fixed with a one-time purchase of a $20 android TV stick. If viewing your familys ARR content isn't worth $20 you probably don't need to do it anyway.

Security for remote streaming is a harder thing to handle. Most people are capable of port forwarding, But just hanging a smallish public project out there in the open is always a dicey proposition. It honestly needs real fail2ban, probably SSL, 2FA and password complexity requirements.

We could probably make a jellyfin helper container to handle some of this. Walk people through Let's Encrypt, dynDNS, port forwarding tests, add fail2ban with a firewall, maybe even slap suricata in it.

We need to convince the project to add 2FA and password complexity requirements.

I don't know guys what do you think is it crazy? does it make sense? Would anybody actually use it?

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I access my stuff via VPN. As for sharing with others, I simply don't do that. VPN is still an option though. Or temporary client whitelisting, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] psychadlligoat@piefed.social 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Someone else already said it and you've already swapped but I'll say it in detail:

when setting the server connection up you selected "ServerName (long string of numbers)" and not "ServerName (your IP - SECURE)"

this routes your connection through the Plex servers and makes it not a local connection anymore. this is extremely easy to do and forget you've done because it barely impacts performance

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In other words, it's a dark pattern that tricks users into letting Plex MITM their connection.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It gets around port forwarding/firewall issues that most people don't know how to deal with. But putting it behind a paywall kinda kills any chance of it being a benevolent feature.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Labeling it as "SECURE" (implying the other option is insecure) is enough to make it seem underhanded to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 36 points 2 days ago (38 children)

Old news, but time for Jellyfin. I made the switch a couple months ago. Some minor teething issues, but better, IMO, especially now as my family all have LDAP users and that just works.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Welp, i killed mine yesterday as it wouldnt let me stream while offline. Modem died so no Internet for me. Why do i have everything local if it dosent work while offline...

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Exactly. Thats why i use jellyfin now. Try installing it alongside. For me it worked well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why anyone still uses Plex for new setups is beyond me.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

pretty much the only reason I still use Plex is because I like to be able to watch stuff during downtime at work and plex.tv isn't blocked on the work network while my private domain is.

And no, using a hotspot off my phone on a personal computer isn't an option, both because the security requirements of my job site prevent us from using personal devices in the main area where I work and because the building itself is a massive concrete structure that blocks most cell signals.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Plex has pay walled FREE servers streaming to FREE clients only.

If you have a plex watch pass (for client) you're good and can stream from any server. If you have a plex pass (for server) any one can stream from your server. But you have to have one or the other.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For software I like made by people getting paid, I was happy to pay the one time fee. It's really good, secure, and downloads are fast now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plex has paywalled my server!

Skill issue tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tkw8@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

I've never been a Plex user. Always been with Jellyfin. I've heard that plexamp is a killer app but finamp has always been sufficient for my pretty basic needs. But I have a question for you (meant in good faith). You say,

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

If Plex needs a sustainable business model, asking for donations isn't enough. So what is the move for them? What do they do to both fulfill their need for a sustainable business and also not upset their userbase? (I'm not defending Plex or this move of taking your server hostage, in any way.)

I'm genuinely curious how, with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, they should have played this or at a minimum, made better moves than they did.

Very glad you're with jellyfin btw. You can check out some cool plugins at awesome-jellyfin.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Donations isn’t going to cover the hunger of a 40 million dollar VC round. Those investors want more than a return, they want plex profitable ASAP

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Investors are like parasitic leeches to any business model. As soon as you add them, the business has to grow in order to satisfy the leeches who provide no benefit to the model other than to be attached to it. If you ignore the leech, they'll drain all your lifeforce, so your only option is to satisfy them and feed them. Unfortunately, they are also ravenous creatures who are never satisfied. If you feed them a little, they'll want more next time in an endless cycle.

Once you are infected by investors ... eventually they will destroy whatever you created.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plex really needs to do a Tailscale style connection to your server. But instead they chose to keep their outdated method of funneling all of their traffic through their servers, and need to charge lots of money in order to pay for it.

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Considering both Plex and Tailscale are going toward VC exits, Headscale and Jellyfin is the only FOSS way atm.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Access via IP address and not the name. I've been having to do it that way for several days now, too.

Edit to add: It's due to a change I made in my OpnSense setup. I restored a ZFS snapshot and it's working again as it should.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I had a plex pass and was still having tons of issues streaming to other devices such as Apple TV. So I switched everything over to jellyfin with news server and have everything scheduled through radarr and sonarr. Never going back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Make sure your home server config isn’t mistaking this client as a remote user. Check your networking, etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is just some glitch. They’ve not said anything about watching stuff locally becoming a pay thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›