this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
296 points (96.5% liked)

News

30111 readers
3509 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ex-Trump insider Lev Parnas over the weekend noted the situation surrounding the Los Angeles protests, saying "the clock is ticking" as Trump has "troops in the streets, tanks on standby, and plans to crush the resistance."

"I know a lot of you woke up this morning in shock—staring at the footage out of Los Angeles, asking yourselves: How could this happen? Is this real? Is this really happening in the United States of America? But let me be clear, folks—this is real. It is happening. And I need you to know that my sources deep inside Trump World have been warning me that what we witnessed overnight was no isolated event. It’s part of something much bigger. And what I have to tell you today is chilling," he wrote.

"Yesterday, when Donald Trump deployed over 2,000 federal troops into Los Angeles under the justification of 'restoring order,' most headlines ran with it like it was some isolated act of retaliation—just another example of Trump punishing blue states. And yes, part of this is personal. Make no mistake: this is revenge against California, against Governor Gavin Newsom, and against Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. But it’s not just about settling scores."

According to Parnas, in reality, "This is about control."

"What happened yesterday in Los Angeles was a test run—a dry rehearsal for something much, much bigger. I’ve been hearing from multiple trusted insiders that Trump’s inner circle—particularly Pete Hegseth and some of the more radicalized loyalists embedded at the Pentagon—are actively drafting operational plans for the mass mobilizations expected on June 14th," he added. "This isn’t just about Trump’s birthday. This isn’t just about another vanity parade. This is about shutting down resistance."

Parnas added that Trump "fears the American people rising up on June 14th, in all 50 states, with signs that say No Kings—with voices that remind the world that we are still a democracy."

"That’s why he’s pushing for tanks. That’s why he wants the biggest military display America has seen since the Cold War. Because he wants the optics of power. He wants to smother the story before it even begins. He wants his parade to dominate the headlines, not the marchers in the streets fighting for democracy," he said. "But I need you to understand this: According to my sources, there are discussions happening right now—within Trump’s most trusted circle—about invoking martial law if the protests 'get out of hand.' They’re looking for any excuse. Any video. Any act of violence. Any disruption. That’s all they need to justify a crackdown."

He then warned people not to fall for a trap being set by Trump associates.

"And it gets worse. What I’m being told is that Trump allies—including elements connected to Proud Boys, III Percenters, and other far-right militia networks—are planning to infiltrate the June 14th protests. Not to support them. To sabotage them. Their goal? Create chaos. Spark confrontation. Trigger a response from law enforcement. And then hand Trump the justification he needs to clamp down," Parnas wrote. "Let me say this loud and clear: We cannot give them that excuse."

Parnas went on to encourage peace, and told protesters to "stay vigilant."

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 87 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The plan is pretty fucking obvious, you don't need an insider to tell you what someone who signposts their every amateur fascist move, will do.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Apparently you do. I was getting downvoted all weekend for saying that violent resistance was a trap. Maybe it’ll make a difference coming from someone with Trump’s playbook.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Violent resistance is inevitable in the conditions that have been purposefully curated to induce violent resistance so.... yes you are right.

Also it is a very late stage of this coup of democracy here so..... im not gonna waste too much breath on it, just focus on effective nonviolent resistance.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure, but if we take to violence with less than 1% of our population, we’ll just lose numbers and scare people from future protests. Our largest protest was only 1.5% at 5M nationwide, and that included a lot of elderly people who wouldn’t join in a fight.

The goal remains increasing our numbers. Talk to people in person, your neighbors, your coworkers, your friends who don’t follow politics. The days of not discussing politics in polite society are over.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You don't need violence per se, as much as the threat of it. Take the 2014 Maidan protests; the cops were happy to set up a sniper corridor along the planned peaceful march route and cut down unarmed protestors. That night the protestors announced they'd be coming back tomorrow, only all of them armed with guns. Cops today might be militarized, but that's nothing in the face of 90,000 people with guns, and they know it, so they miraculously found somewhere else to be the next day and nobody got shot.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Agreed. You don’t threaten ICE with a handful of people throwing rocks and M80s. That excites them. You threaten them with a large group of people they’re incapable of controlling.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's pretty impressive, is there an article I can read about this?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's a really good documentary on it called "Winter on Fire". The full thing is available on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/yzNxLzFfR5w

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

The calls for violent revolt also tend to feel very scripted and forced. And nanosecond reply times as well the moment anyone advocate to not take the bait.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just one human and no crowd.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Good to know anything we can about fascist infiltration into the resistance and agent provocateurs, but the implication that protesters can do anything to stop these plans seems incorrect to me. If a proud boy or whoever dresses up as a protester and torches a cop car or whatever, there's nothing protesters can really do to stop it. The people who will need to be vigilant are the media and lawmakers who will be pressured into condemning the protests as a whole because of the actions of these infiltrator assholes.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

The media and lawmakers all serve capitalism, they won’t help us

[–] fsr1967@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's a thing going around on Facebook saying that if violence starts, you should just sit down in place. If all of the actual protesters do that, it'll be pretty obvious the violence is coming from provacateurs.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't fucking sit down. That's terrible advice. Cops beat the shit out of compliant protesters all the time. Fight back or run away. If you're not capable of either then you've already missed your chance at contributing to the movement.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Okay, first I think it needs to be said that this is a complex and difficult situation that really doesn't leave us with any good options either way, and I think both sides of this debate have people with good intentions behind them.

Second, this

Cops beat the shit out of compliant protesters all the time.

is true and something people need to be aware of.

However, third, it needs to be said that

Fight back

will absolutely get the shit beaten out of you unless you got an army in your back pocket I somehow haven't heard about yet.

Fourth,

Fight back or run away. If you're not capable of either then you've already missed your chance at contributing to the movement.

Bullshit. Every news story picture and video that shows protesters getting attacked and arrested is an incredibly powerful piece of evidence showing the consequences of rising fascism in America that's going to be harder and harder for the people who are trying to ignore all this stuff to tune out. Even the selfish asshole centrist dipshits who don't care about immigrant rights and just want everything to settle down are going to see that this unrest can't be beaten into submission and efforts to do so just make the protests bigger, and that's when those people are going to turn on the fascists and say "Look, I was willing to give up civil liberties for law and order, but you can't even give us that." (we're already seeing talk like that out of Gavin Newsom).

Personally, I say if you're in a protest and cops start attacking, run away if you can or sit down if you can't, because I don't feel comfortable asking people to just turn themselves over to the mercy of law enforcement who may very well do permanent injury to them, but I have nothing but respect for the people who do make that sacrifice for this movement, and the notion that people being arrested aren't contributing is absolute bullshit.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Dumb idea. cops won’t leave the sitters alone they’ll go after them first because cops are pussies who look for the easiest way off the clock

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Be vigilant means when someone is breaking windows before the protest even starts... to remember what you just read.

What you do when it happens, or even less mundane events that happen every day, is up to you.

"Maybe you do not care much about the future of the Republican Party. You should. Conservatives will always be with us. If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. The will reject democracy."

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's our alternative? Roll over and let the fascists take over?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Peaceful resistance and outreach until we have the numbers. A small violent resistance will be incarcerated, dissuading people from protest out of fear for their safety, and play into the narrative that we are domestic threats justifying the Insurrection Act. It’s exactly how the Reichstag Fire emboldened Hitler against the communists.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't this post taking about how peaceful protests are going to be used as cover by bad actors to make violent protests?

So, no violent protests. No peaceful protests. What's left to us?

[–] INeedMana@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the message was "be prepared to de-escalate provocations during protests"

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I suppose I can see that. Aside from the advice elsewhere in this page to "just sit down," is there any general advice on how to do that?

[–] INeedMana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know

Fortunately
but maybe "yet"...

I Ducked https://activisthandbook.org/wellbeing/deescalation maybe one of the sources would be helpful?

EDIT: purely what I (from my chair) think might work: (of course, don't step outside your own boundaries, safety etc)

  • address the provocateur - to redirect the emotions from the police, so situationally it's not their place to respond anymore
  • be calm and try to address that this is not the way we want to protest. "I understand that you are angry. I am too. But this is not the way we can change things, violence is not the answer..." - to dissipate the anger put out by the provocateur so it's not picked up by non-provocateurs
  • probably if those will be organized, they will be moving in packs and pairs, so when you address one guy, another one will try to pick up the anger. That's why it's important that many of protesters are aware that provocations might be taking place and be ready to back you up with calming down

EDIT2:

  • if you are successful they will be trying to trigger you. Be mindful of your tone and body language - your role is not to convince them, but to affect the mood around you. We are social creatures, the point is to not get to the point of a pack of angry wolves
  • remember that they don't have to be a provocateur, they might be just a protester that is that angry at the situation. Be respectful, don't get into accusation/blame game
  • remember that provocateurs don't have to be bald burly men
[–] PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The IWW used to have members pull security to route out planted agent provocateurs that were starting shit in mass strikes or protests. We will need that again.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

This whole article reads like https://theonion.com/protesters-urged-not-to-give-trump-administration-pretext-for-what-it-already-doing/

They're going to use ANY excuse to do this. They're literally advertising that they're going to use instigators to make sure they get the videos they need to do what they're going to do anyways

These things aren't won with peaceful protesting alone. We need both mass peaceful action and targeted violence.

They're going to suppress us as if we did both anyways, might as well make progress.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We shall see. He was also supposed to declare martial law on April 20th.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

He just wrote in an executive order that he’d have his cabinet asses the need to invoke it after 90 days. It was two part plan, had he corrupted the FBI enough to confirm that Venezuela was invading the US through violent criminal immigration. Thankfully, the FBI found no evidence to confirm his claim.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

But let me be clear, folks—this is real

the — (aka "em dash") that keep popping up in the article is a good sign it's written by AI. I count 7 or 8 of them.

that said, it's not crazy to think that Trump is trying to be a dictator, esp. given how he's been pretty direct about how he wants to do that.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You can view the full report on his Substack from the link in the article. He uses them a lot in his writing. He also posts long form videos.

https://open.substack.com/pub/levremembers/p/trumps-military-move-in-la-was-just

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah could just be word autoformatting

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Or choosing to use an em dash.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

Plenty of us real humans use em dashes.

[–] Roughknite@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Emdashes are used in professional writing everywhere. I'm a technical writer and use it all the time. Dumb to claim it's AI. AI use of the emdash is way easier to spot because it's way more frequent than this.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You stay on the em dash patrol — thank you for your service!

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He has used agitators in the past, he will do it again. and there is an influencer who specializes in right wing agitators.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Military plan out things. Plan for alternatives. Makes plans based on enemy response scenarios. This is all planned. They will provoke until we respond and then they will retaliate. The United States government is an active terror threat right now.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

i remember the blm protests, they had specific agitators to stoke some kind of conflict, and one asian one is well known for doing it, convenient it was a vietnamese guy.