this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

30730 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
admiralpatrick@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
0
Women and LGBTQ+ people take up guns after Trump’s win: ‘We need to protect ourselves’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 7 months ago by Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I do not blame any woman or queer person arming themselves in the U.S. right now. But I think that you should think of it as personal protection rather than preparation for something larger.

Be aware of this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disarmament_of_the_German_Jews

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.

Obviously, women and queer people are a lot more than 1% of the population, but you can't count on every queer person being on the right side and you certainly can't count on every woman to be on the right side.

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As an alternative, if we assume that a significant portion of the left is armed instead of just a minority, Rojava would be a good modern day example of the realistic effectiveness of an armed populace, as they employ horizontal citizen militias to survive against both ISIS and Turkey.

The Spanish Civil War is another interesting example, as the initial response from the left/anarchists when the fascists began their coup attempt was made up of civilian militias formed quickly and armed with whatever they had or could source from a local armory, and they were able to effectively fight off the initial coup in almost half the country, and gather themselves up for a protracted conflict. It's not quite as direct an example, as the leftists in that conflict we supplemented with tanks and airplanes and artillery from the USSR, but firearms were an essential piece to their resistance, and had the populace been more armed before hand, it would've been helpful, as they had trouble producing and acquiring enough through trade.

There's a great series on the Spanish Civil War here that gets into the nitty gritty, if you're interested. :)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, you're calling what is happening in Syria a good example? Do you know how many people died? Also in the Spanish Civil War?

It's great how people here are willing to sacrifice so many innocent lives on their behalf.

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Both conflicts are horrific, but what was their alternative? We saw what happened in Germany when few fought back, and that was just as horrific an outcome, if not more so (6 million Jews killed vs 300 thousand on the left side in the Spanish civil war, though estimates vary).

Tens of thousands died under Mussolini in labor camps and via execution, and the same would've happened under Franco in Spain (and eventually did, post civil war)

To be clear, I'm not advocating that any country rush to armed conflict, but history seems to indicate that it's better to be capable of defending yourself vs. not having the option at all.

If you have examples of pacifism being effective against fascism, I'm quite open to having my mind changed. In fact, I would prefer if that were the more effective option, if evidence supports it.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

America, can we stop it with the guns and violence?

I get the idea of wanting to defend oneself, but that ultimately means a shootout. It's hardly going to matter who shot the first bullet in the history books. The far right are also going to arm themselves when they see other people arming themselves. And it's only going to 'prove them right' in their eyes.

Do I have a better solution, no. But more mass shootings isn't going to be the answer. And it's only going to take one shootout before it's used in a legal sense against people. And guns aren't going to be what's made illegal in the United States, especially with a republican-controlled government...

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 0 points 7 months ago

You could make that same argument to the countries neighboring Nazi Germany.

We have examples in history of what happens to unarmed people when fascists take over and few fight back, and it does nothing to quell the fascist's efforts or 'fears'. We also have examples of armed people fighting back, like the leftists in the Spanish Civil war. Their defeat was not a given, and they made the fascists work bloody hard for it. The alternative would've been the leftists having to blend in or be disappeared/killed, or they could've left everything and fled. The less you fight them, the stronger they become, until they become too big to run from or ignore.

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Im a liberal guess who now has a gun safe with multiple guns?

I guess we are making America great again by arming the liberals too?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also by helping the struggling gun industry

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

there's an easy solution: only buy foreign made guns.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s not that easy. The vast majority of imports are banned and the remaining sporting imports are subject to significant restrictions. The overwhelming majority of guns sold in the US are produced in the US, even ones from foreign manufacturers. It’s not that dissimilar to cars.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say that it's the 'vast majority' of imports that are banned. The Gun Control Act of '68 mostly ends up applying to very small, often cheap, pistols ("Saturday night specials"), and guns that don't have a "legitimate sporting purpose". The ATF has said that practical shooting competitions (e.g., two gun, three gun, etc.) doesn't count as "legitimate sporting purpose", but the IWI Tavor is sold in the US, and is manufactured in Israel. source for that claim

Right now Turkish guns are having a moment. The Turks are making cheap firearms--sometimes very good, sometimes just cheap-- and sometimes making outright clones of more popular popular firearms. True, you'd be supporting Erdogan, but hey, you can't always win.

Personally, I'm waiting for someone to start importing KMR pistols. The KMR L-02 Orca OR looks like an improved CZ Shadow II Orange, but I suspect the $3200 price tag is lot steep for most people. :(

[–] CafeFrog@lemmy.cafe 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Turkey is actively killing and repressing the kurds of Syria, such as Rojava, so if we're boycotting US manufacturers, might be good to avoid turkish one's too if possible, to deprive their government of tax revenue.

I'm not really sure if there is an 'ethical' choice with the big manufacturers anywhere, just different degrees of bad, though definitely worth indirectly supporting the less bad option.

You could opt for small boutique builders that explicitly support leftists and trans, like KE Arms, but those are few and far between. Best resource I can find is this list from the liberalgunowners reddit wiki.

Alternatively, opt for buying used guns from lefitist gun stores (if you have one near you, or can order from them online to a local ffl). That's probably the best option from a cost and ethics perspective.