this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
403 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23968 readers
2740 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 175 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

“The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior …”

Dude that’s your entire administration. Have some self-awareness, you orange, sagging, coffin dodging oxygen thief.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 83 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Who, Trump the thirty-two times felon?

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 74 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Never met the guy. We're talking the 34 felony convicted man.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, right, 34 felonies. So far.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 51 points 10 hours ago

34 convicted felonies so far

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t forget rapist. Probably liked them young, like his buddy Epstein.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago

allegedly he asked epstein for a 13 year old that looked like his daughter.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

And heres a lives of the rich and famous type show where ivanka shows us her childhood bedroom. Watch her face after she shows her bed, right near the end. She looks like she's about to fall apart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CsxHBS89Lw

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 147 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It has begun. Trump unleashing the army against the population fighting against his gestapo.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 62 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I am very fearful that many protesters will be murdered in the coming days.

And things will deteriorate quickly

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I expect them to switch to live ammo within the month

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think days, weeks if we're lucky

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 37 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a post on X that the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." ~ABC News

They are already threatening to send in Marines...

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 30 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They've been jerking themselves off to deploying the military against California for decades. This is their fantasy come true and they can hardly wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 85 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Whatever side of this issue you fall on, you should at least know that, tactics-wise, joining with the LAPD to do raids in Eastside LA is not going to work how you think it will. There’s movies, albums, books, historic moments in living memory, etc. that warn about that. Start in Sacramento or wherever. Don’t expect East LA to care about your “authority.”

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 69 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

The powerful and their goons seem to have forgotten that sure they can roll up anywhere with an army and overpower protesters, but that's not going to solve this. It's just going to start a true resistance.

There have been few times in history where resistance forces have fought state forces on an open battlefield.

As seen historically, a typical resistance force will harrass the enemy. Bomb their buildings, stockpiles, and infrastructure. Wait until the state goons are alone, at their homes, at the bar, in a grocery store and then that's when they kill them.

All sending the national gaurd in to kill protesters will result in is a true resitance forming.

The powerful have forgotten what it was like to be afraid to leave their fortresses

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 8 hours ago

I hope a true resistance is born of this. We need to band together and rise up!

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago

Agreed. If protestor blood is spilled, it will foment a resistance that will build.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HorseTesselator@midwest.social 64 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Maybe a bit of a hot take, but I think Trump is also doing this at least partly to distract from his spat with Musk's Epstein implications. Not to mention Trump's upcoming parade. Also, keep in mind that 2,000 Nat'l guard troops is surprisingly low, especially for an area the size of L.A. In '92 they brought in almost 10,000.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't nervous about this, too, but personally I believe people need to keep their cool, here. I'm seeing a lot of doom spiraling and panicking all over the place online and we need to be mindful of how this affects us mentally and emotionally.

We're in the long game.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 32 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

This is basically my take as well, Californian cities are fucking massive and 2,000 people in LA especially is barely a drop in the bucket. Also these are National guardsmen who may very well be pissed they are being sent to stand around outside in LA during the summer, the concrete and blacktop does not let go of heat easily.

Edit: Bucket not bugget, my auto correct is on bath salts.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago (10 children)

Also, a number of them will agree with protesters.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

And there's another factor, out of any militarized element in the US the national guard have the potential to be the least threatening. They were affected by the post Vietnam reforms just like the rest of the branches, especially after Kent state. Fact of the matter is the guardsmen are far more likely to take issue with ICE and the police in general, reminder that quite a few came forward after the BLM protests saying they wanted to defend the protestors from the police.

Mind you that doesn't eliminate risks involved but it does mean that there is far far more potential for this to utterly backfire in Trump's face.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Catma@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

No its not to distract from Musk. He is lowballing deployment so if/when it doesnt work and he deploys the actual Army or Marines it will seem "reasonable". He is 100% looking for a reason to fuck California hard and will get it.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 58 points 9 hours ago

You mean the Man who Deployed Secret Police in his FIRST TERM is Deploying the National Guard in his SECOND TERM? I did NAZI This coming!

[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 50 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

It's starting!!! The downfall of democracy, we had a good run!

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 46 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Or its revival. This might become the spark that turns these protests into a revolution.

A new Boston massacre may be in our future

[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago

I honestly hope this is the case, that would clearly be the best possibly outcome.

Revolution can also be slow, especially when it comes to tech oligarchs helping to enable to current administration, they can easily help obfuscate the narrative.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 43 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, that happened the instant the SCOTUS declared the president above the law and Biden didn't say "fuck you, idiots", fire all the justices who ruled in favor of that decision at gunpoint, appoint all new justices in their place, and then declare that ruling void by fiat. If you're about to say "the president can't do that", the SCOTUS declared the president above the law, he actually can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

we had a good run!

I'd rank it as 'just OK' compared to how the rest of the western developed world is doing and how many resources and advantages we had from the start. We can do much better next time. I think in the upcoming defederation we are not only going to let the south secede, we will insist on it. Godspeed to texas, florida, and the south.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Given the fact that the US was the first modern democracy, was born from a revolution, and was hobbled by the fucking South from day one is say it did pretty damned good. Seriously it could've failed as early as the whiskey rebellion but it didn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 8 hours ago

They've been salivating for an opportunity like this. I bet they thought it would have happened already

[–] damdy@lemm.ee 26 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This is actually insane. Bringing tanks to a knife fight... except it's not even a knife fight it's a thumb war. This is going to cause country wide rioting and Trump's only recourse will be to further up the anti. I feel worried for you guys.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

This is all predictable. By next summer, besides more immigration crimes, we'll have food and product shortages, massive tariff-driven inflation, an economy roiling over his constant market manipulation, Luigi's trial, arrests of prominent politicians and resistors, etc. There will be protests against all of these issues and more, and he will use those protests to stir up trouble and create violence.

By next summer it will get really ugly, and he'll declare Martial Law, and suspend the Midterm election, so he can preserve his Congressional majorities.

Without Skum to rig the election, he will have no choice but to go with the Martial Law option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 10 hours ago

“purposefully inflammatory”

Uh... this goes a bit beyond "inflammatory" chief.

Bass said in a statement Saturday night. “Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable.”

Well at least he got the stuff about feckless Democrats right.

Police on Friday night issued a citywide tactical alert nearly two hours after declaring protests across the downtown area unlawful assemblies. “The use of less lethal munitions has been authorized by the Incident Commander,”

I mean ACAB so this isn't new, but still holy authoritarianism batman.

Newsom said in a statement responding to Huerta’s arrest, describing the union president as a “respected leader, a patriot and an advocate for working people.”

I'd like that sentiment to carry over to, you know, actual policy, but I guess he's not folding like a lawn chair yet.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There is a good reason not to follow unconstitutional orders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Distraction or not, Trump is a coward who thinks deploying soldiers at a protest will make him look tough. It doesn't. It makes him look scared and pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Like there's no article of the Constitution giving right of protest.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 19 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

But you dont understand one protestor littered , meaning that it is now an illegal gathering and that the thousands of people gathered are a violent mob.

Very convenient

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 hours ago

There's also a part that says freedom of speech, right to a fair trial, freedom from unreasonable search & seizures, right to asylum...

How's that going?

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf? Why is this the first I'm hearing of this?!?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I was looking at porn while hundreds of other people stood up to the face of fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 11 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Going to be watching this with great curiosity and excitement. Hopefully other places get the idea. Going to be very curious where Newsom comes down on this.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Here we go. It’s about to get crazy folks!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 23 minutes ago

Funny how he doesn't hesitate here, but when Congress was literally in danger of being fucking lynched on Jan 6, he didn't do shit.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago

This is going to make Kent State look like a fraternity prank.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 10 hours ago

Tin soldiers and the Donvict's coming. We're finally on our own...

load more comments
view more: next ›